Courtney T van Geelen1, Peter Savas1,2, Zhi Ling Teo1, Stephen J Luen1,2, Chen-Fang Weng1, Yi-An Ko1, Keilly S Kuykhoven3, Franco Caramia1, Roberto Salgado1, Prudence A Francis2,4, Sarah-Jane Dawson1,2,4, Stephen B Fox1,5,4, Andrew Fellowes5, Sherene Loi6,7,8. 1. Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. 3. Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Health and Biosecurity, Geelong, Australia. 4. Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. 5. Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. 6. Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. sherene.loi@petermac.org. 7. Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. sherene.loi@petermac.org. 8. Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. sherene.loi@petermac.org.
Correction to: Breast Cancer Research (2020) 22:91 10.1186/s13058-020-01328-0
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified some errors in Fig. 4. The correct figure is given below.
Fig. 4
Prognostic associations in this cohort of sequenced metastatic breast cancer patients. a Overall survival by subtype for all recruited patients (n = 323). b Overall survival of patients based on the mutational burden of 4 mutations (75th percentile) or more (n = 234). c Overall survival of ER + HER2 − patients based on the median mutation number of 4 or more (n = 163 patients). d Table of HR for all patients and all subtypes by mutation number per sample. Patients were excluded if there was incomplete survival information. e Spread of TILs across distant metastatic site (n = 123)
Prognostic associations in this cohort of sequenced metastatic breast cancer patients. a Overall survival by subtype for all recruited patients (n = 323). b Overall survival of patients based on the mutational burden of 4 mutations (75th percentile) or more (n = 234). c Overall survival of ER + HER2 − patients based on the median mutation number of 4 or more (n = 163 patients). d Table of HR for all patients and all subtypes by mutation number per sample. Patients were excluded if there was incomplete survival information. e Spread of TILs across distant metastatic site (n = 123)The original article [1] has been corrected.
Authors: Courtney T van Geelen; Peter Savas; Zhi Ling Teo; Stephen J Luen; Chen-Fang Weng; Yi-An Ko; Keilly S Kuykhoven; Franco Caramia; Roberto Salgado; Prudence A Francis; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Stephen B Fox; Andrew Fellowes; Sherene Loi Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2020-08-18 Impact factor: 8.408