| Literature DB >> 35839255 |
Elbatool G Elalem1, Musharraf Jelani2,3, Alaa Khedr4, Aftab Ahmad5, Tareef Y Alaama6, Mohamed Nabeel Alaama6, Huda M Al-Kreathy1, Zoheir A Damanhouri1.
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS: Inter-individual variability in response to statin was mainly due to genetic differences. This study aimed to investigate the association of CYP3A4*22 (rs35599367), CYP3A5*3 (rs776746) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) with response to simvastatin in hypercholesterolemia patients conducted at King Abdulaziz University hospital (KAUH) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 274 participants were registered in the current study. Hypercholesterolemic patients taking simvastatin 20 mg (n = 148) and control subjects (n = 126) were tested for rs35599367 and rs776746 genotypes using Custom Taqman ® Assay Probes. Response to simvastatin in these patients was assessed by determination of low density lipoprotein (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC) and by measuring statin plasma levels using Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35839255 PMCID: PMC9286239 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260824
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Fig 1MRM chromatograms for simvastatin standard solution.
(50 ng/ml) showing Simvastatin peak at 7.9 min (MRM, 419.5➔285.4) and In St peak at 3.3 min (MRM, 296.1➔215.2).
Demographic data for all participants.
| Simvastatin Users (20 mg) | Non-Statin Users (Control Group) | Total No. | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants’ number | 148 (54%) | 126 (46%) | 274 (100%) |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 75 (51%) | 64 (51%) | 139 (51.00%) |
| Female | 73 (49%) | 62 (49%) | 135 (49.00%) |
| Age (years) | 59.30 ± 8.24 | 52.36 ± 11.71 | 55.17 ± 12.71 |
| Nationality | |||
| Saudi | 116 (78%) | 73 (42%) | 189 (69%) |
| Non-Saudi | 32 (22%) | 53 (42%) | 85 (31%) |
Data were expressed as mean +/- SEM or number (%) as appropriate.
Mutant allele and genotypes distribution of CYP3A4*22 (AA/GA) in total, Saudi and non-Saudi participants.
| Genetic Polymorphism | Saudi | Non-Saudi | Total | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotypes | Number (n = 189) | Genotypes distribution (%) | MAF | Number (n = 85) | Genotypes frequencies | MAF | Number (n = 274) | Genotypes distribution (%) | MAF | χ2 | HWE- |
|
| |||||||||||
| Mutant Homozygous (AA) |
|
| 0.021 | - | - | 0.024 | - | - | 0.022 | 0.147 | 0.701 |
| Wild Homozygous (GG) | 181 | 95.80 | 81 | 95.30 | 262 | 95.60 | |||||
| Heterozygous (GA) | 8 | 4.20 | 4 | 4.70 | 12 | 4.40 | |||||
| G | 370 | 97.8 | 166 | 97.6 | OR (95% CI) 0.89 (0.27–3.02) | ||||||
| A | 8 | 2.2 | 4 | 2.4 | |||||||
For CYP3A4*22 rs35599367 (American MAF = 0.026, GG = 0.948, GA = 0.052/ South Asian MAF = 0.006, GG = 0.998, GA = 0.012/ European MAF = 0.050, GG = 0.903, GA = 0.095, AA = 0.002 /African MAF = 0.001, GG = 0.998, GA = 0.002).
Data were expressed as number (%). MAF: Minor allele frequency, χ2: Chi square, HWE. P—value: for the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Mutant allele and genotypes distribution of CYP3A5*3 (TT/CT) in total, Saudi and non-Saudi participants.
| Genetic Polymorphism | Saudi | Non-Saudi | Total | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotypes | Number (n = 189) | Genotypes distribution (%) | MAF | Number (n = 85) | Genotypes frequencies | MAF | Number (n = 274) | Genotypes distribution (%) | MAF | χ2 | HWE- |
|
| |||||||||||
| Mutant Homozygous (TT) | 13 | 6.80 | 0.233 | 3 | 3.53 | 0.106 | 16 | 5.80 | 0.193 | 4.23 | 0.040 |
| Wild Homozygous (CC) | 114 | 60.40 | 70 | 82.35 | 184 | 67.20 | |||||
| Heterozygous (CT) | 62 | 32.80 | 12 | 14.12 | 74 | 27.00 | |||||
| C | 290 | 77.00 | 152 | 89.00 | OR (95% CI) 2.56 (1.49–4.41) | ||||||
| T | 88 | 23.00 | 18 | 11.00 | |||||||
For CYP3A5*3 rs776746 (American MAF = 0.203, TT = 0.058, CC = 0.651, CT = 0.291/ South Asian MAF = 0.332, TT = 0.121, CC = 0.456, CT = 0.423/ East Asian MAF = 0.287, TT = 0.079, CC = 0.506, CT = 0.415).
Data were expressed as number (%). MAF: Minor allele frequency, χ2: Chi square, HWE. P–value: for the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
The effect of combined CYP3A4/5 genotypes on metabolizers status among all participants.
| Allelic status | ||
|---|---|---|
| PMs | IMs | |
| N = 0 (0%) | N = 16 (5.7%) | |
| IMs | EMs | |
| N = 12 (4.3%) | N = 246 (90%) |
N: number of participants, LOF: Loss of function, DOF: Decrease of function, PMs: Poor metabolizers, IMs: Intermediate metabolizers, EMs: Extensive metabolizers.
Data were expressed as numbers (%).
The frequencies of intemediate and extensive metabolizers among Saudi and non-Saudi participants.
| Metabolizers types | Total (n = 274) | Saudi (n = 189) | Non-Saudi (n = 85) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | percentage | n | percentage | n | percentage | |
| Poor metabolizers | - | - | - | |||
| Intermediate metabolizers | 28 | 10% | 21 | 11% | 7 | 8% |
| Extensive metabolizers | 246 | 90% | 168 | 89% | 78 | 92% |
The Effect of combined CYP3A4/5 genotypes on low density lipoprotein, total cholesterol and plasma simvastatin levels in hypercholesteremia patients.
| Genotypes Combined | Number (%) | LDL-C reading mmol/L | TC reading mmol/L | Plasma statin concentration (ng/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intermediate metabolizers | 15 (10%) | 1.90 ± 0.40 | 3.32 ± 0.70 | 65.16 ± 12.00 |
| Extensive metabolizers | 133 (90%) | 3.25 ± 0.65* | 5.12 ± 0.90* | 41.19 ± 7.20* |
Data were expressed as mean +/- SEM or number (%) as appropriate.