Literature DB >> 35838903

Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Complete Radiologic Response to Trans-Arterial Embolization: A Retrospective Study on Patterns, Treatments, and Prognoses.

Crisanta H Ilagan1, Debra A Goldman2, Mithat Gönen2, Victoria G Aveson3, Michelle Babicky4, Vinod P Balachandran1,5, Jeffrey A Drebin1,5, William R Jarnagin1,5, Alice C Wei1,5, T Peter Kingham1,5, Ghassan K Abou-Alfa5,6, Karen T Brown7, Michael I D'Angelica8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited information about the long-term outcomes and patterns of progression in patients who have unresectable, liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with complete response (CR) to transarterial embolization and do not undergo resection or transplantation (LT).
METHODS: A retrospective review analyzed participants in a randomized trial comparing hepatic artery embolization (HAE) and drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with doxorubicin who had CR according to modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST). The overall survival (OS), incidence and patterns of progression, and factors associated with progression were assessed.
RESULTS: Of the 101 patients in the trial, 37 with CR were included in this study. This cohort had 17 patients treated with HAE (46 %), and 20 patients managed with DEB-TACE (54 %). The median age was 67 years (range, 42-82 years). Most of the cohort were male (86.5 %) and Caucasian (78 %). The median pre-treatment Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 10, and 70 % of the cohort had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B or C. The median follow-up period was 49 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 9-108 months), and the median OS was 25 months (95 % CI, 18.9-30.9 months). The 3- and 5-year survival rates were respectively 31 % (95 % CI, 16.7-45.9 %) and 18 % (95 % CI, 6.8-32.1 %). The 1- and 2-year cumulative incidences of progression were respectively 76 % (95 % CI, 57.7-86.8 %) and 92 % (95 % CI, 74.5-97.6 %). The most common first site of progression was the previously treated hepatic site or local site (32 %, 12/37). The 3-year cumulative incidence of progression was 65 % (95 % CI, 46.4-78.4 %) for the local site.
CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced-stage HCC and CR to embolization do not have durable responses and experience inevitable disease progression. Most patients with progression have liver-confined disease and should be evaluated for additional consolidative treatments.
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35838903     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12036-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  33 in total

Review 1.  Milan criteria in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an evidence-based analysis of 15 years of experience.

Authors:  Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Sherrie Bhoori; Carlo Sposito; Marco Bongini; Martin Langer; Rosalba Miceli; Luigi Mariani
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Julie K Heimbach; Laura M Kulik; Richard S Finn; Claude B Sirlin; Michael M Abecassis; Lewis R Roberts; Andrew X Zhu; M Hassan Murad; Jorge A Marrero
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Liver cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.

Authors:  Behnoosh R Momin; Paulo S Pinheiro; Helena Carreira; Chunyu Li; Hannah K Weir
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in All 50 United States, From 2000 Through 2012.

Authors:  Donna L White; Aaron P Thrift; Fasiha Kanwal; Jessica Davila; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Chung-Mau Lo; Henry Ngan; Wai-Kuen Tso; Chi-Leung Liu; Chi-Ming Lam; Ronnie Tung-Ping Poon; Sheung-Tat Fan; John Wong
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Recommendations for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an international consensus conference report.

Authors:  Pierre-Alain Clavien; Mickael Lesurtel; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Gregory J Gores; Bernard Langer; Arnaud Perrier
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Josep M Llovet; Maria Isabel Real; Xavier Montaña; Ramon Planas; Susana Coll; John Aponte; Carmen Ayuso; Margarita Sala; Jordi Muchart; Ricard Solà; Joan Rodés; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Cancer statistics, 2016.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 9.  Epidemiology and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura Kulik; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  V Mazzaferro; E Regalia; R Doci; S Andreola; A Pulvirenti; F Bozzetti; F Montalto; M Ammatuna; A Morabito; L Gennari
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-03-14       Impact factor: 176.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.