Heng Jiang1,2, Christopher M Doran3, Robin Room1,4, Tanya Chikritzhs5, Jason Ferris6, Anne-Marie Laslett1. 1. Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia. 2. Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. Cluster for Resilience and Wellbeing, Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 4. Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs, Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. 6. Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Drawing on a study of the range and magnitude of harms that alcohol caused to specific others in Australia, and on social and health agency statistics for collective costs, this article produces an analysis of the economic cost of alcohol's harm to others (AHTO) in Australia. METHOD: This study used a general population survey and routinely collected social response agencies' data to quantify different costs of AHTO, using methods consistent with International Guidelines for Estimating the Costs of Substance Abuse. This approach estimates costs for health care and social services, crime costs, costs of productivity loss, quality of life-year loss and other expenses, including both tangible costs (direct and indirect) and intangible costs of loss of quality of life (respondents' self-reported loss of health-related quality of life). RESULTS: The cost of AHTO in Australia was AUD$19.81 billion (95% CI [11.99, 28.34]), with tangible costs accounting for 58% of total costs ($11.45 billion, which is 0.68% of gross domestic product in 2016) and intangible costs of $8.36 billion. The costs to private individuals or households ($18.1 billion and 89% of total costs of AHTO) are greater than the costs to the government or society because of others' drinking in Australia. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents an estimation of the economic cost of harm from others' drinking. The economic costs from others' drinking are large and of much the same magnitude as the costs that drinkers impose on themselves, as found in previous studies. Preventing harm to others from drinking is important as a public health goal for both economic and humane reasons.
OBJECTIVE: Drawing on a study of the range and magnitude of harms that alcohol caused to specific others in Australia, and on social and health agency statistics for collective costs, this article produces an analysis of the economic cost of alcohol's harm to others (AHTO) in Australia. METHOD: This study used a general population survey and routinely collected social response agencies' data to quantify different costs of AHTO, using methods consistent with International Guidelines for Estimating the Costs of Substance Abuse. This approach estimates costs for health care and social services, crime costs, costs of productivity loss, quality of life-year loss and other expenses, including both tangible costs (direct and indirect) and intangible costs of loss of quality of life (respondents' self-reported loss of health-related quality of life). RESULTS: The cost of AHTO in Australia was AUD$19.81 billion (95% CI [11.99, 28.34]), with tangible costs accounting for 58% of total costs ($11.45 billion, which is 0.68% of gross domestic product in 2016) and intangible costs of $8.36 billion. The costs to private individuals or households ($18.1 billion and 89% of total costs of AHTO) are greater than the costs to the government or society because of others' drinking in Australia. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents an estimation of the economic cost of harm from others' drinking. The economic costs from others' drinking are large and of much the same magnitude as the costs that drinkers impose on themselves, as found in previous studies. Preventing harm to others from drinking is important as a public health goal for both economic and humane reasons.
Authors: Anne-Marie Laslett; Oliver Stanesby; Sharon Wilsnack; Robin Room; Thomas K Greenfield Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Robin Room; Jason Ferris; Anne-Marie Laslett; Michael Livingston; Janette Mugavin; Claire Wilkinson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2010-04-21 Impact factor: 3.390