Literature DB >> 35838242

Design, Implementation, and Evolution of the Medicaid Outcomes Distributed Research Network (MODRN).

Kara Zivin1, Lindsay Allen2, Andrew J Barnes3, Stefanie Junker4, Joo Yeon Kim4, Lu Tang4, Susan Kennedy5, Katherine A Ahrens6, Marguerite Burns7, Sarah Clark8, Evan Cole4, Dushka Crane9, David Idala10, Paul Lanier11, Shamis Mohamoud10, Marian Jarlenski4, Mary Joan McDuffie12, Jeffery Talbert13, Adam J Gordon14, Julie M Donohue4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the US, Medicaid covers over 80 million Americans. Comparing access, quality, and costs across Medicaid programs can provide policymakers with much-needed information. As each Medicaid agency collects its member data, multiple barriers prevent sharing Medicaid data between states. To address this gap, the Medicaid Outcomes Distributed Research Network (MODRN) developed a research network of states to conduct rapid multi-state analyses without sharing individual-level data across states.
OBJECTIVE: To describe goals, design, implementation, and evolution of MODRN to inform other research networks.
METHODS: MODRN implemented a distributed research network using a common data model, with each state analyzing its own data; developed standardized measure specifications and statistical software code to conduct analyses; and disseminated findings to state and federal Medicaid policymakers. Based on feedback on Medicaid agency priorities, MODRN first sought to inform Medicaid policy to improve opioid use disorder treatment, particularly medication treatment.
RESULTS: Since its 2017 inception, MODRN created 21 opioid use disorder quality measures in 13 states. MODRN modified its common data model over time to include additional elements. Initial barriers included harmonizing utilization data from Medicaid billing codes across states and adapting statistical methods to combine state-level results. The network demonstrated its utility and addressed barriers to conducting multi-state analyses of Medicaid administrative data.
CONCLUSIONS: MODRN created a new, scalable, successful model for conducting policy research while complying with federal and state regulations to protect beneficiary health information. Platforms like MODRN may prove useful for emerging health challenges to facilitate evidence-based policymaking in Medicaid programs.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35838242      PMCID: PMC9378530          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   3.178


  31 in total

1.  Comparative-effectiveness research in distributed health data networks.

Authors:  S Toh; R Platt; J F Steiner; J S Brown
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  A self-scaling, distributed information architecture for public health, research, and clinical care.

Authors:  Andrew J McMurry; Clint A Gilbert; Ben Y Reis; Henry C Chueh; Isaac S Kohane; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Engagement, Research, and Evidence: Leveraging the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network for Better Cardiovascular Health.

Authors:  Adrian F Hernandez; Henry P Cruz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Medication-assisted therapies--tackling the opioid-overdose epidemic.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; Thomas R Frieden; Pamela S Hyde; Stephen S Cha
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Deaths: Final Data for 2018.

Authors:  Sherry L Murphy; Jiaquan Xu; Kenneth D Kochanek; Elizabeth Arias; Betzaida Tejada-Vera
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2021-01

6.  Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance therapy: a randomized double-blind trial with 405 opioid-dependent patients.

Authors:  Richard P Mattick; Robert Ali; Jason M White; Susannah O'Brien; Seija Wolk; Cath Danz
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  The National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) Bariatric Study Cohort: Rationale, Methods, and Baseline Characteristics.

Authors:  Sengwee Toh; Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Emily E Harmata; Roy Pardee; Rosalinde Saizan; Elisha Malanga; Jessica L Sturtevant; Casie E Horgan; Jane Anau; Cheri D Janning; Robert D Wellman; R Yates Coley; Andrea J Cook; Anita P Courcoulas; Karen J Coleman; Neely A Williams; Kathleen M McTigue; David Arterburn; James McClay
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-12-05

9.  Use of Medications for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder Among US Medicaid Enrollees in 11 States, 2014-2018.

Authors:  Julie M Donohue; Marian P Jarlenski; Joo Yeon Kim; Lu Tang; Katherine Ahrens; Lindsay Allen; Anna Austin; Andrew J Barnes; Marguerite Burns; Chung-Chou H Chang; Sarah Clark; Evan Cole; Dushka Crane; Peter Cunningham; David Idala; Stefanie Junker; Paul Lanier; Rachel Mauk; Mary Joan McDuffie; Shamis Mohamoud; Nathan Pauly; Logan Sheets; Jeffery Talbert; Kara Zivin; Adam J Gordon; Susan Kennedy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method.

Authors:  Joanna IntHout; John P A Ioannidis; George F Borm
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.