| Literature DB >> 35837620 |
Kethe Marie Engen Svantorp-Tveiten1, Andreas Ivarsson2,3, Monica Klungland Torstveit3, Christine Sundgot-Borgen1, Therese Fostervold Mathisen4, Solfrid Bratland-Sanda5, Jan Harald Rosenvinge6, Oddgeir Friborg6, Gunn Pettersen7, Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen1.
Abstract
Background: Mediation analysis is important to test the theoretical framework underpinning an intervention. We therefore aimed to investigate if the healthy body image (HBI) intervention's effect on eating disorder (ED) symptomatology and use of muscle building supplements was mediated by the change in risk and protective factors for ED development and muscle building supplement use.Entities:
Keywords: adolescence; body image (MeSH); eating disorder (ED); mental health; muscle building supplements; prevention
Year: 2022 PMID: 35837620 PMCID: PMC9274278 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.803654
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Recruitment, randomization, and participant flow. s = number of schools (clusters), n = number of students. The figure presents the number of consenting students. The number of students for the outcome measures varies between the different instruments.
Overview of the content and aims of the three workshops in the HBI intervention.
| #1 Body image | |
|
|
|
| Project introduction | Experience of meaningfulness and motivation |
| Influencing factors on body perception. What promotes and reduces positive body image, and how can we enforce the health promoting factors? | Body image and body acceptance |
| Where does body idealization come from? Why does it conflict with positive body image, and potential health consequences from striving for the idealized body? | Reduce idealization and internalization of body ideals |
| Fat talk and focus on lifestyle only related to appearance in everyday communication. To what degree do we participate, how does it make us feel, and can we reduce it? | Reduce fat talk and negative body talk |
| Improve peer environment | |
| Introduction to self-talk and self-esteem in WS#2 | Stimulate motivation for next workshop |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Social media perception and use. Empower yourself to choose mood enhancing over mood destructive content | Enhance media literacy |
| Extreme exposure without filter equals need to be critical to sources of information and awareness of retouching | Enhance media literacy |
| The nature of comparison, how to recognize destructive comparison and reduce its presence in everyday life | Reduce amount of comparison |
| Strengthen acceptance and love for individual differences, defining characteristics of ones’ own and among friends. Students tell and write down compliments to a friend and him/herself unrelated to appearance. | Improve positive self-talk |
| Improve self-compassion | |
| Improve peer environment | |
| Experiences and benefits of positive self-talk | Improve skills to strengthen self-esteem |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Benefits on body experience from listening to bodily needs such as physical activity and healthy eating | Improve experience of embodiment and positive body image |
| Truths and myth about lifestyle products and literature | Improve ability to reject exercise and nutritional myths—health information literacy |
| From aesthetic to functional focus; how can change in focus improve body experience and healthy lifestyle that again benefit well-being? | Change from potential unhealthy focus to healthy focus on the body |
| How may regular exercise and smart nutrition promote positive body image and what are the basic recommendations? | Body experience enhancing attitudes and behaviors |
Retrieved and adapted from
Sample characteristics shown as the mean and SD or percentage and number of observations (N).
| Boys | Girls | |||||||
| Intervention | Control | Intervention | Control | |||||
| T1 | T4 | T1 | T4 | T1 | T4 | T1 | T4 | |
| Sample size (n) | 276 | 155 | 131 | 67 | 590 | 436 | 276 | 177 |
| Age (years) | 16.81 (0.46) | 16.70 (0.51) | 16.79 (0.49) | 16.77 (0.50) | ||||
| EDEQ | 0.96 (1.15) | 0.70 (0.90) | 1.12 (1.24) | 0.69 (0.75) | 2.41 (1.61) | 1.80 (1.51) | 2.66 (1.72) | 2.44 (1.83) |
| Self-esteem | 33.01 (5.69) | 33.79 (5.99) | 32.42 (6.48) | 32.68 (6.90) | 29.45 (5.95) | 30.99 (6.10) | 28.47 (6.43) | 28.11 (7.42) |
| BIAAQ | 70.53 (9.52) | 71.33 (1.60) | 70.26 (1.24) | 69.77 (1.84) | 58.20 (15.71) | 62.94 (16.13) | 57.00 (16.83) | 56.98 (19.39) |
| SATAQ-4 Thin | 2.49 (0.97) | 2.07 (0.89) | 2.64 (0.92) | 2.26 (0.79) | 3.31 (1.08) | 2.79 (1.13) | 3.39 (1.13) | 3.28 (1.19) |
| SATAQ-4 Muscular | 3.21 (1.12) | 2.77 (1.07) | 3.30 (1.03) | 3.09 (1.09) | 3.02 (1.09) | 2.68 (1.03) | 2.99 (1.05) | 2.74 (1.10) |
| SATAQ-4 Media | 2.10 (1.16) | 1.90 (1.03) | 2.24 (1.16) | 2.06 (1.09) | 3.19 (1.24) | 2.90 (1.27) | 3.22 (1.26) | 3.37 (1.23) |
| Weekly protein use% (n) | 22.8 (63) | 8.9 (14) | 30.7 (40) | 29.4 (20) | 6.9 (41) | 5.0 (22) | 7.3 (20) | 5.4 (19) |
| Weekly creatine use% (n) | 10.5 (29) | 3.1 (5) | 17.5 (23) | 9.7 (7) | 2.3 (14) | 1.3 (7) | 3.2 (9) | 1.8 (3) |
T1, baseline scores; T4, 12-month follow-up scores; BMI, body mass index; EDEQ, ED symptomatology; BIAAQ, body image acceptance and action scale; SATAQ-4 Thin, thinness internalization; SATAQ-4 Muscular, muscular and athletic internalization; SATAQ-4 Media, perceived appearance pressure from media.
FIGURE 2(A–E) It presents the direct and indirect effects of the healthy body image (HBI) intervention on eating disorder examination questionnaire (EDEQ), protein supplement use, and creatine supplement use via change in (A) body image acceptance and action questionnaire (BIAAQ) (body image flexibility), (B) self-esteem, (C) sociocultural attitudes toward appearance questionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4) thin (thin internalization), (D) SATAQ-4 muscular (muscular and athletic internalization), and (E) SATAQ-4 media (perceived media pressure). Standardized coefficients for boys are placed above the path and for girls under the path. Indirect effects (ab path) are shown as unstandardized coefficients. Significant coefficients are printed in solid black and non-significant coefficients are printed in gray. T1, baseline; T2, posttest; T3, 3-month follow-up; T4, 12-month follow-up. *p ≤ 0.05. The baseline values for the main outcome variables were included as covariates.
Intercept, slope, and model fit indices for the mediation models for each mediator.
| Self-esteem | BIAAQ | SATAQ-4 thin | SATAQ-4 muscular | SATAQ-4 media | ||||||
| Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | |
| Intercept | 32.79 | 29.23 | 70.45 | 58.00 | 2.49 | 3.28 | 3.20 | 2.93 | 2.11 | 3.16 |
| Slope | −0.08 | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.92 | −0.13 | −0.11 | −0.09 | −0.09 | −0.05 | −0.04 |
|
| ||||||||||
| X2 | 75.86b | 123.32b | 50.29b | 62.51b | 66.00b | 85.21b | 52.88b | 99.05b | 52.13b | 72.89b |
| CFI | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.97 |
| RMSEA | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| 90% CI | 0.04, 0.07 | 0.05, 0.07 | 0.02, 0.05 | 0.03, 0.05 | 0.03, 0.06 | 0.04, 0.06 | 0.02, 0.05 | 0.04, 0.06 | 0.02, 0.06 | 0.03, 0.05 |
| SRMR | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
Slope, mean change at each timepoint; intercept, mean score at T1.
BIAAQ, body image acceptance and action scale; SATAQ-4 Thin, thinness internalization; SATAQ-4 Muscular, muscular and athletic internalization; SATAQ-4 Media, perceived appearance pressure from media.