| Literature DB >> 35837268 |
Ilona Holcomb1, Nidhanjali Bansal1, Tommy Duong1, Paul Babb1, Julie Laliberte2, Karthikeyan Swaminathan1, Hui Helen Xu1, Leigh Ann Melloy1, Jerry Hildebrand1, Andrew Farmer1.
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has the ability to classify each cell and determine the transcriptomic profile of specific cell types and cells of a given disease state; however, sensitivity of the gene count for each cell can be a critical component to the success of a single-cell study. The recently introduced SMART-Seq Single Cell PLUS Kit (SSsc PLUS) claims to provide higher sensitivity and reproducibility versus popular methods for the sequencing analysis of single cells. Here, the cDNA-generation component of the kit, SMART-Seq Single Cell Kit (SSsc), was compared with the popular homebrew protocol, Smart-seq2, and its update, Smart-seq3. The SMART-Seq Library Prep Kit from SSsc PLUS was benchmarked against a commonly used scRNA-seq library preparation method, Illumina Nextera XT. Finally, the SSsc chemistry was tested in both full and fractional volumes on 2 popular liquid-handler devices to investigate whether the high sensitivity was maintained in miniaturization. We demonstrate that SSsc PLUS outperforms these other full-length methods in convenience, sensitivity, gene identification, and reproducibility while also offering full compatibility with automation platforms.Entities:
Keywords: PLATE-seq; RNA-seq; automation; full-length sequencing; miniaturization; single-cell analysis; single-cell library prep
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35837268 PMCID: PMC9258451 DOI: 10.7171/3fc1f5fe.dbeabb2a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomol Tech ISSN: 1524-0215