| Literature DB >> 35837021 |
Feng Hong1, Yubo Liu2,3, Veeranjaneya Reddy Lebaka4, Arifullah Mohammed5, Weibing Ye2, Biqing Chen1, Mallikarjuna Korivi2.
Abstract
Background/Purpose: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) constitutes a spectrum of liver diseases associated with various metabolic disorders. Exercise interventions reportedly manage the clinical outcomes of NAFLD, but their efficacy depends on exercise as well as characteristics of patient. We hypothesized that exercise could alleviate the elevated transaminases level, which may be associated with the characteristics of patients (age/bodyweight/sex) or exercise variables (frequency/intensity/duration). Therefore, we examined the effect of exercise on serum transaminases, and identified the variables influencing transaminases in NAFLD patients.Entities:
Keywords: NAFLD therapy; fatty liver; older age group; physical actvity; transaminase
Year: 2022 PMID: 35837021 PMCID: PMC9273783 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.894044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.755
FIGURE 1Flowchart of the study selection according to the latest Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA).
Characteristics of the included articles.
| Study | Country | Participants (M/F) | Age (Y) | BMI | Exercise type | Intensity | Frequency (t/wk) | Duration (wk) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise | Control | ||||||||
|
| England | 15 (15/0) | 12 (12/0) | 57.4 | 31.6 | AE | 40–60% HRR | 4–5 | 16 |
|
| Saudi Arabia | 16 (10/6) | 16 (9/7) | 54.4 | 36.3 | HIIT | 80–85% VO2max | 3 | 8 |
|
| China | AE:29 (7/22) | 31 (13/18) | AE:61.28 | AE:25.46 | AE | AE:60–70% HRmax | 3 | 22 |
| RE:31 (16/15) | RE:55.8 | RE26.86 | RE | RE:60–70% 1RM | |||||
|
| China | AE:22 (5/17) | CO:18 (4/14) | AE:59 | AE:27.3 | AE | 60–75% VO2max | 2–3 | 36.9 |
| AE + DT:23 (7/16) | DT:22 (6/16) | AE + DT:60 | AE + DT:26.4 | ||||||
|
| England | 12 (nr) | 12 (nr) | 54 | 33 | AE + RE | RPE 14–18 | 3 | 12 |
| (hard–very hard) | |||||||||
|
| Iran | 12 (12/0) | 11 (11/0) | 38.67 | 30.37 | AE | 55–60% HRR | 3 | 8 |
|
| China | 130 (130/0) | 139 (130/0) | 56.68 | 26.04 | AE | 60–80% target heart rate (170-age) | 3–4 | 103 |
|
| Saudi Arabia | 50 (34/16) | 50 (36/14) | 50.78 | 32.35 | AE | 65–75% HRmax | 3 | 12 |
|
| Brazil | 19 (0/19) | 21 (0/21) | 56.2 | 34.1 | AE | VAT up to 10% below RCP | 2 | 24 |
|
| England | 15 (15/0) | 12 (12/0) | 52.4 | 31.6 | AE + RE | 40–60% HRR | 4–5 | 16 |
|
| England | 11 (nr) | 12 (nr) | 54 | 31.5 | HIIT | RPE 16–17 | 3 | 12 |
| (very hard) | |||||||||
|
| Iran | AE: 10 (10/0) | 10 (10/0) | AE: 39.7 | AE: 28.1 | AE | AE: 60–75% HRmax | 3 | 8 |
| RE: 10 (10/0) | RE: 45.9 | RE: 30.6 | RE | RE: 50–70% 1RM | |||||
|
| England | 13 (7/6) | 8 (4/4) | 50 | 30 | AE | 30–60% HRR | 3–5 | 16 |
|
| England | 6 (nr) | 5 (nr) | 45 | 31 | AE | 30–60% HRR | 3–5 | 16 |
|
| China | 77 (41/36) | 77 (31/46) | 51 | 25.5 | AE + RE | Moderate-intensity | 3–5 | 51 |
|
| United States | 12 (4/8) | 6 (1/5) | 48.6 | 37.1 | AE | 45–55% VO2max | 5 | 16 |
|
| England | 11 (nr) | 8 (nr) | 52 | 32.3 | RE | 50–70%1RM | 3 | 8 |
|
| United States | 21 (14/7) | 10 (8/2) | 48.9 | 33.9 | AE + RE | Moderate-intensity | nr | 48 |
Note: M/F, male/female; Y, years; t/wk, times/week; AE, aerobic exercise; RE, resistance exercise; AE + RE, combination of aerobic and resistance exercises; HIIT, high-intensity interval training; Co., control; DT, diet; nr, not reported; VO2max, maximal oxygen uptake; HRR, heart rate reserve; HRmax, maximal heart rate; 1RM, one-repetition maximum; RPE, ratings of perceived exertion (6–20); VAT, ventilatory anaerobic threshold; RCP, respiratory compensation point.
FIGURE 2Pooled outcomes of exercise intervention on ALT levels in NAFLD/NASH patients. SD, standard deviation; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
FIGURE 3Pooled outcomes of exercise intervention on AST levels in NAFLD/NASH patients. SD, standard deviation; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
Meta-regression analysis to identify the effective variables.
| Characteristics of patients | Coefficient | Standard error | T-Value |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Baseline BMI | −0.4281872 | 0.5619431 | −0.76 | 0.455 |
| Age | 1.138232 | 0.2380615 | 4.78 | 0.000 | |
| Sex (17 trials) | −10.23261 | 6.730051 | −1.52 | 0.149 | |
| BMI reduction (19 trials) | −3.137282 | 2.17553 | −1.44 | 0.167 | |
|
| Baseline BMI | −0.6276582 | 0.5291798 | −1.19 | 0.255 |
| Age | 0.459831 | 0.2045216 | 2.25 | 0.041 | |
| Sex (11 trials) | −2.131885 | 5.426621 | −0.39 | 0.704 | |
| BMI reduction (13 trials) | −2.288405 | 1.974409 | −1.16 | 0.271 |
Represents statistical significance.
FIGURE 4Subgroup analysis of exercise intervention on changes in ALT levels in different age groups of NAFLD/NASH patients. SD, standard deviation; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
FIGURE 5Subgroup analysis of exercise intervention on changes in AST levels in different age groups of NAFLD/NASH patients. SD, standard deviation; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
FIGURE 6Risk of bias summary of the included studies.