| Literature DB >> 35836924 |
Qing Zhang1, Lei Wan1, Qin Chen1, Chen Li1, Ningning Wang1, Yang Wang1, Yuanyuan Li1, Jingjing Huang1, Qin Hu1.
Abstract
Background: Continuous nursing based on 5E rehabilitation mode can improve the physiology and psychology of patients to some extent. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of continuous nursing of 5E rehabilitation mode on the prevention and prognosis of severe respiratory tract infection in patients with severe tracheotomy in neurosurgery. Objective: To explore the effect of 5E rehabilitation nursing model on the prevention of severe respiratory tract infection and prognosis in patients with severe tracheotomy in neurosurgery.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35836924 PMCID: PMC9276491 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2727679
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.809
Figure 1Comparison of nursing satisfaction between two groups.
Comparison of oxygenation index, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and partial pressure of oxygen between the two groups ().
| Group |
| Oxygenation index | Partial pressure of carbon dioxide | Oxygen partial pressure | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After offline 12 h | After offline 24 h | After offline 12 h | After offline 24 h | After offline 12 h | After offline 24 h | ||
| C group | 30 | 395.94 ± 23.44 | 336.49 ± 42.11 | 36.97 ± 3.31 | 35.19 ± 2.45 | 141.29 ± 31.33 | 125.92 ± 34.23 |
| R group | 30 | 351.29 ± 35.22 | 394.19 ± 23.11 | 33.59 ± 1.24 | 32.10 ± 1.21 | 133.49 ± 23.34 | 151.34 ± 34.32 |
|
| 5.780 | 6.579 | 5.237 | 6.193 | 2.441 | 2.872 | |
|
| <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |
Comparison of psychological status between the two groups (, points).
| Group |
| SAS | SDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | ||
| C group | 30 | 59.82 ± 4.31 | 47.49 ± 2.67 | 54.19 ± 3.11 | 49.53 ± 3.55 |
| R group | 30 | 59.83 ± 4.44 | 40.91 ± 2.31 | 54.79 ± 2.56 | 43.19 ± 2.34 |
|
| 0.008 | 10.207 | 0.815 | 8.167 | |
|
| >0.05 | <0.01 | >0.05 | <0.01 | |
Figure 2Comparison of the incidence of severe respiratory tract infection between two groups.
Comparison of quality of life scores between the two groups before treatment (, points).
| Group |
| Physiological function | Psychological function | Social function | Healthy self-cognition | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | ||
| C group | 30 | 15.84 ± 4.91 | 13.86 ± 2.95a | 16.94 ± 3.91 | 14.85 ± 4.86a | 18.82 ± 3.95 | 16.37 ± 2.81a | 15.98 ± 3.91 | 13.86 ± 1.85a |
| R group | 30 | 15.96 ± 4.52 | 11.84 ± 2.91b | 16.95 ± 3.86 | 12.81 ± 1.85b | 18.84 ± 3.55 | 12.84 ± 3.81b | 15.87 ± 3.66 | 10.83 ± 2.91b |
|
| 0.098 | 2.670 | 0.009 | 2.148 | 0.020 | 4.084 | 0.112 | 4.812 | |
|
| 0.921 | 0.009 | 0.992 | 0.035 | 0.983 | <0.01 | 0.910 | <0.01 | |
Note: comparison before and after nursing in the control group, aP < 0.05. Comparison before and after nursing in the research group, bP < 0.05.