| Literature DB >> 35836512 |
Ziyang Huang1, Binbin Chen1, Yixin Ling1,2, Yangya Pan1,2, Songfu Jiang1, Shenghui Zhang1,3, Kang Yu1, Yixiang Han4.
Abstract
Background: The T-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (T-NHL) patients with bone marrow (BM) invasion have a poor prognosis. Although BM biopsy is still a confirmed diagnosis method, the low sensitivity restricts its use to detect the minimal BM invasion. It is of great clinical significance to establish a rapid and highly sensitive method to evaluate BM invasion.Entities:
Keywords: CD3+CD7− T cells; T-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (T-NHL); prognostic predictor
Year: 2022 PMID: 35836512 PMCID: PMC9273714 DOI: 10.21037/tcr-21-2666
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Cancer Res ISSN: 2218-676X Impact factor: 0.496
clinical characteristics of patients with T-NHL
| Characteristics | CD3+CD7− ≥1.035% (n=24) | CD3+CD7− <1.035% (n=61) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median age [range] (years) | 63.5 [28–77] | 57 [17–83] | 0.430 |
| Male/female | 15/9 | 44/17 | 0.438 |
| Ann Arbor stage, n (%) | |||
| I | 3 (12.5) | 16 (26.2) | 0.249 |
| II | 3 (12.5) | 11 (18.0) | 0.748 |
| III | 5 (20.8) | 18 (29.5) | 0.589 |
| IV | 13 (54.2) | 15 (24.6) | 0.012 |
| Unclassified | 0 | 1 (1.6) | 1.000 |
| Diagnostic criteria, n (%) | |||
| Pathology | 19 (79.2) | 58 (95.1) | – |
| PET-CT | 20 (83.3) | 57 (93.4) | – |
| Marrow invasion, n (%) | 12 (50.0) | 12 (19.7) | 0.008 |
| Marrow invasion criteria, n (%) | |||
| Pathology | 3 (12.5) | 3 (4.9) | – |
| PET-CT | 1 (4.2) | 2 (3.3) | – |
| Flow cytometry | 12 (50.0) | 8 (13.1) | – |
| Bone marrow smear | 10 (41.7) | 7 (11.5) | – |
| TCR gene rearrangement | 11 (45.8) | 17 (27.9) | – |
PET-CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography; T-NHL, T-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; TCR, T-cell receptor.
Figure 1The frequency CD3+CD7− T cells is increased in bone marrow in T-NHL patients with bone marrow invasion. (A) Proportion of CD3+CD7− T cells of nucleated cells was shown. (B) Proportion of CD3+CD7− T cells of lymphocytes was shown. (C) Proportion of CD3+CD7− T cells of T lymphocytes was shown. (D) Ratio of CD4/CD8 in CD3+CD7− T cells was shown. (E) ROC curve analysis of proportion of CD3+CD7− T cells of nucleated cells in T-NHL patients was shown. NS, not significant; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; T-NHL, T-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
Figure 2Percentage of CD3+CD7− T cells has no difference in a number of subtypes and EBV infection. (A) There is no obvious difference in proportion of CD3+CD7− T cells of nucleated cells in different subtypes of T-NHL. (B) There is no obvious difference in proportion of CD3+CD7− T cells of nucleated cells in T-NHL patients with or without EBV infection. AITL, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma; ALCL, anaplastic large cell lymphoma; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; NKTCL, natural killer/T-cell lymphoma; NS, not significant; PTCL-NOS, peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified; TLBL, T cell lymphoblastic lymphoma; T-NHL, T cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
Figure 3Increased expression of immune inhibitory checkpoints was shown in CD3+CD7− T cells in T-NHL patients with BM invasion. (A) CD3+CD7− T cells had a higher LAG-3 expression than CD3+CD7+ T cells. (B) CD3+CD7− T cells had a higher PD-1 expression than CD3+CD7+ T cells. (C) CD3+CD7− T cells had a higher ration of CD4/CD8 than CD3+CD7+ T cells. (D) CD3+CD7−CD4+ T cells had a higher PD-1 expression than CD3+CD7+CD4+ T cells. APC, allophycocyanin; BM, bone marrow; LAG-3, lymphocyte-activation-gene-3; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PE, phycoerythrin; T-NHL, T-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.