| Literature DB >> 35835895 |
Belén Mollá1,2, Miguel Heredia1,2, Ángela Campos1, Pascual Sanz3,4,5.
Abstract
Lafora disease (LD) is a fatal rare neurodegenerative disorder that affects young adolescents and has no treatment yet. The hallmark of LD is the presence of polyglucosan inclusions (PGs), called Lafora bodies (LBs), in the brain and peripheral tissues. LD is caused by mutations in either EPM2A or EPM2B genes, which, respectively, encode laforin, a glucan phosphatase, and malin, an E3-ubiquitin ligase, with identical clinical features. LD knockout mouse models (Epm2a - / - and Epm2b - / -) recapitulate PG body accumulation, as in the human pathology, and display alterations in glutamatergic transmission and neuroinflammatory pathways in the brain. In this work, we show the results of four pre-clinical trials based on the modulation of glutamatergic transmission (riluzole and memantine) and anti-neuroinflammatory interventions (resveratrol and minocycline) as therapeutical strategies in an Epm2b - / - mouse model. Drugs were administered in mice from 3 to 5 months of age, corresponding to early stage of the disease, and we evaluated the beneficial effect of the drugs by in vivo behavioral phenotyping and ex vivo histopathological brain analyses. The behavioral assessment was based on a battery of anxiety, cognitive, and neurodegenerative tests and the histopathological analyses included a panel of markers regarding PG accumulation, astrogliosis, and microgliosis. Overall, the outcome of ameliorating the excessive glutamatergic neurotransmission present in Epm2b - / - mice by memantine displayed therapeutic effectiveness at the behavioral levels. Modulation of neuroinflammation by resveratrol and minocycline also showed beneficial effects at the behavioral level. Therefore, our study suggests that both therapeutical strategies could be beneficial for the treatment of LD patients. A mouse model of Lafora disease (Epm2b-/-) was used to check the putative beneficial effect of different drugs aimed to ameliorate the alterations in glutamatergic transmission and/or neuroinflammation present in the model. Drugs in blue gave a more positive outcome than the rest.Entities:
Keywords: Cognitive impairment; Lafora disease; Memantine; Minocycline; Neuroinflammation; Resveratrol; Riluzole
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35835895 PMCID: PMC9463199 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-022-02956-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Neurobiol ISSN: 0893-7648 Impact factor: 5.682
Fig. 1Anxiety-like behavior state in Epm2b − / − mice and the therapeutic efficacy of riluzole, memantine, resveratrol, and minocycline treatments. A Representative tracks were recorded with SMART video system to evaluate the anxiety-like behavior as measured by Open field (see “Materials and Methods” section). B–E % traveled distance in the center representing the anxiety levels of each animal. Bar graphs show mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Individual data points and the comparisons between groups which were p < 0.1 are indicated. Depending on the normal distribution and homoscedasticity of the data, statistical differences were analyzed, by two-way ANOVA following a Tukey’s post hoc to multiple comparisons in (B) and by one-way Kruskal–Wallis following a Dunn’s post hoc test to multiple comparisons in (C–E). Statistical significance was defined as *p < 0.05. A summary of all descriptive (mean ± SEM) and inferential data (all comparisons between groups) is available in Table S1. Treatments related to glutamatergic transmission are boxed in red and those related to neuroinflammation are in magenta
Summary of selected comparisons of Epm2b − / − mice treated or not with the indicated compounds (see Supplementary Tables S1 and S2)
| Behavioral or histological features | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Openfield: % traveled distance in center | Not modified | Not modified | Not modified | ||
y-maze: % incomplete alternancies | Not modified | Not modified | Not modified | ||
OLM: activity time (s) | Not modified | Not modified | Not modified | ||
Hindlimb clasping score | |||||
PAS number | Not modified | Not modified | Not modified | Not modified | |
% GFAP area | Not modified | Not modified | Not modified | Not modified | |
% Iba1 + cells | Not modified | Not modified | Not modified | Not modified | Not modified |
#Comparison of Epm2b − / − mice with control animals treated with saline (from the memantine and minocycline trials). Statistical significance is considered *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Comparisons with a p-value < 0.05 are shown in bold. Cohen’s delta coefficient (d) is indicated as negligible (d < 0.20), small (d > 0.20), medium (d > 0.50), large (d > 0.80), and much large (d > 1.00) size effect (see “Materials and Methods” section)
Fig. 2Cognitive state in Epm2b − / − mice and the therapeutic efficacy of riluzole, memantine, resveratrol, and minocycline treatments. A Representative tracks were recorded with SMART video system to evaluate the working memory as measured by y-maze (see “Materials and Methods” section). B–E % of the incomplete alternations representing the attention of staying on the task of each animal. Bar graphs show mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Individual data points and the comparisons between groups which were p < 0.1 are indicated. Depending on the normal distribution and homoscedasticity of the data, statistical differences were analyzed, by two-way ANOVA following a Tukey’s post hoc to multiple comparisons in (B, D) and by one-way Kruskal–Wallis following a Dunn’s post hoc test to multiple comparisons in (C, E). Statistical significance was defined as *p < 0.05. A summary of all descriptive (mean ± SEM) and inferential data (all comparisons between groups) is available in Table S1
Fig. 3Hyperactivity in Epm2b − / − mice and the therapeutic efficacy of riluzole, memantine, resveratrol, and minocycline treatments. A Representative tracks were recorded with SMART video system to evaluate the spatial location memory as measured by OLM (see “Materials and Methods” section). B–E Total activity time representing the activity levels of each animal. Bar graphs show mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Individual data points and the comparisons between groups which were p < 0.1 are indicated. Depending on the normal distribution and homoscedasticity of the data, statistical differences were analyzed, by two-way ANOVA following a Tukey’s post hoc to multiple comparisons in (B) and by one-way Kruskal–Wallis following a Dunn’s post hoc test to multiple comparisons in (C–E). Statistical significance was defined as *p < 0.05. A summary of all descriptive (mean ± SEM) and inferential data (all comparisons between groups) is available in Table S1
Fig. 4Neurodegenerative state in Epm2b − / − mice and the therapeutic efficacy of riluzole, memantine, resveratrol, and minocycline treatments. A–D Relative frequency distribution of the hindlimb clasping score representing the severity of neurodegenerative signs. Frequency histograms show frequency distribution among 4 scores: absent, mild, moderate, and severe. Statistical differences between groups were analyzed by Pearson’s chi-square test or by Fisher’s exact test when sample sizes were zero. Statistical significance was defined as ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001. A summary of all contingency tables and inferential data (all comparisons between groups) is available in Table S2
Fig. 5Accumulation of PGs in the hippocampus of Epm2b − / − mice and the therapeutic efficacy of riluzole, memantine, resveratrol, and minocycline. A Representative microscopy images of PG detection (in pink; see also black arrows) in CA1 region of the hippocampus by PAS staining; neural nuclei are in blue. B–E % of PG number versus the number present in untreated Epm2b − / − mice. Bar graphs show mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Individual data points and the comparisons between groups which were p < 0.1 are indicated. Depending on the normal distribution and homoscedasticity of the data, statistical differences were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Welch’s correction following a Tukey’s post hoc to multiple comparisons in (B) and by one-way Kruskal–Wallis following a Dunn’s post hoc test to multiple comparisons in (C–E). Statistical significance was defined as **p < 0.01. A summary of all descriptive (mean ± SEM) and inferential data (all comparisons between groups) is available in Table S1. Scale 20 µm
Fig. 6Effect of the different treatments on the reactive astrogliosis of the Epm2b − / − mice. A Representative immunofluorescence confocal micrographs of the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Astrocytes (GFAP staining) are in magenta and DAPI staining of cellular nuclei are in blue. B–E % GFAP area related to the value obtained in untreated Epm2b − / − mice, representing the extension of the reactive astrogliosis in the hippocampus. Bar graphs show mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Individual data points and the comparisons between groups which were p < 0.1 are indicated. Depending on the normal distribution and homoscedasticity of the data, statistical differences were analyzed by two-way ANOVA following a Tukey’s post hoc to multiple comparisons in (D) and by one-way Kruskal–Wallis following a Dunn’s post hoc test to multiple comparisons in (B, C, E). Statistical significance was defined as **p < 0.01. A summary of all descriptive (mean ± SEM) and inferential data (all comparisons between groups) is available in Table S1. Scale 75 µm
Fig. 7Effect of the different treatments on the reactive microglia in the hippocampus of Epm2b − / − mice. A Representative immunofluorescence confocal micrographs of Iba1 (in gray) to appreciate the remarkable morphological changes in microglia in Epm2b − / − mice (see red arrows); B–E % Iba1 positive cells related to the value obtained in untreated Epm2b − / − mice, representing the extension of the reactive microglia in the hippocampus with morphological changes. Bar graphs show mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Individual data points and the comparisons between groups which were p < 0.1 are indicated. Depending on the normal distribution and homoscedasticity of the data, statistical differences were analyzed by two-way ANOVA following a Tukey’s post hoc to multiple comparisons in (C–E) and by one-way Kruskal–Wallis following a Dunn’s post hoc test to multiple comparisons in (B). A summary of all descriptive (mean ± SEM) and inferential data (all comparisons between groups) is available in Table S1. Scale 75 µm