| Literature DB >> 35835843 |
A Munteanu1, A Ronzova1,2, E Kutalkova1, P Drohsler1, R Moucka1,3, M Kracalik4, O Bilek2, S A Mazlan5, M Sedlacik6,7.
Abstract
Despite the vast amount of studies based on magnetorheological elastomers (MREs), a very limited number of investigations have been initiated on their reprocessing. This paper presents a new type of recyclable MRE which is composed of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and carbonyl iron particles (CI). The chosen TPU can be processed using injection moulding (IM), followed by several reprocessing cycles while preserving its properties. Numerous types of injection moulded and reprocessed MREs have been prepared for various particle concentrations. The effect of thermo-mechanical degradation on the recycled MREs has been investigated while simulating the reprocessing procedure. An apparent decrease in molecular weight was observed for all the examined matrices during the reprocessing cycles. These changes are attributed to the intermolecular bonding between the hydroxyl groups on the surface of the CI particles and the matrix which is studied in depth. The effect of reprocessing and the presence of magnetic particles is evaluated via tensile test, magnetorheology and piezoresistivity. These characterization techniques prove that the properties of our MREs are preserved at an acceptable level despite using 100% of recyclates while in real applications only up to 30% of recycled material is generally used.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35835843 PMCID: PMC9283494 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16129-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1FTIR analysis of neat TPU matrix for each reprocessing cycle.
Molecular weights and polydispersity index obtained from GPC measurements.
| Treatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R0 NEAT | IM | 63,600 ± 2100 | 131,600 ± 2100 | 2.07 ± 0.06 |
| R1 NEAT | IM/one times recycling process | 58,600 ± 900 | 119,900 ± 700 | 2.05 ± 0.05 |
| R2 NEAT | IM/two times recycling process | 57,300 ± 700 | 115,600 ± 600 | 2.02 ± 0.01 |
| R3 NEAT | IM/three times recycling process | 57,700 ± 1200 | 115,200 ± 1300 | 2.00 ± 0.02 |
| R0 80 wt% | IM | 53,100 ± 4200 | 98,800 ± 2200 | 1.87 ± 0.11 |
| R1 80 wt% | IM/one times recycling process 80 wt% filled | 55,600 ± 900 | 100,600 ± 200 | 1.81 ± 0.03 |
| R2 80 wt% | IM/two times recycling process 80 wt% filled | 50,800 ± 300 | 88,600 ± 100 | 1.74 ± 0.01 |
| R3 80 wt% | IM/three times recycling process 80 wt% filled | 46,400 ± 900 | 81,500 ± 1100 | 1.76 ± 0.01 |
Figure 2Whiteness Index values for the original pellet (R*), matrices obtained through IM process (R0) and further reprocessing (R1–R3).
Figure 3Tensile strength properties for unfilled neat TPU matrix (full line) and 80 wt% filled TPU matrix (dot line).
Figure 4Tensile strength of the neat and 80 wt% filled TPU samples.
Figure 5Young's modulus of the neat and 80 wt% filled TPU matrices.
Figure 6Dynamic frequency sweeps for the neat TPU samples at 150 °C.
Figure 7Dynamic time sweeps for (a) R0 PURE open circles and R0 30 wt% half open circles and (b) R0 30 wt.% half open circles and R0 80 wt.% filled circles.
The Tg values of the soft segments at different reprocessing cycles for the 80 wt% MRE.
| R0 | R1 | R2 | R3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| – 17.4 | – 13.1 | – 14.5 | – 14.4 |
Figure 8(a) Dynamic strain sweeps for samples containing 50 wt% CI particles at different magnetic fields (filled symbols; circles 0 kA m–1; triangles 150 kA m–1; stars 450 kA m–1; diamonds 750 kA m–1); neat TPU matrix (unfilled) and (b) MR effect for the same 50 wt% matrix.
Figure 9Resistivity dependences on the relative compression deformation of the neat TPUs (open symbols), 30 wt% filled TPUs (half up open symbols) and 80 wt% filled TPUs (solid symbols) for (a) IM/samples (red), (b) IM/one time recycling process (blue), (c) IM/two times recycling process (green), (d) IM/three times recycling process (purple).