Literature DB >> 35835557

Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in New York State: Clinical Outcomes From the First 3 Years.

Bo Hoon Lee1, Stella Deng2, Claudia A Chiriboga3, Denise M Kay4, Obehioya Irumudomon5, Emma Laureta5, Leslie Delfiner6, Simona O Treidler7, Yaacov Anziska8, Ai Sakonju9, Chelsea Kois10, Osman Farooq11, Kristin Engelstad3, Alexandra Laurenzano3, Katherine Hogan5, Michele Caggana4, Carlos A Saavedra-Matiz4, Colleen F Stevens4, Emma Ciafaloni2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) was added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) in July 2018, largely on the basis of the availability and efficacy of newly-approved disease modifying therapies. New York State (NYS) started universal newborn screening for SMA in October 2018. The authors report the findings from the first 3 years of screening.
METHODS: Statewide neonatal screening was conducted using DNA extracted from dried blood spots using a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay. Retrospective follow-up data were collected from 9 referral centers across the state on 34 infants.
RESULTS: In the first three years since statewide implementation, nearly 650,000 infants have been screened for SMA. 34 babies screened positive and were referred to a neuromuscular specialty care center. The incidence remains lower than previously predicted. The majority (94%), including all infants with 2-3 copies of SMN2, have received treatment. Among treated infants, the overwhelming majority (97%; 29/30) have received gene replacement. All infants in this cohort with 3 copies of SMN2 are clinically asymptomatic post-treatment based on early clinical follow-up data. Infants with 2 copies of SMN2 are more variable in their outcomes. Electrodiagnostic outcomes data from a subgroup of patients (n=11) for whom pre- and post-treatment data demonstrated either improvement or no change in CMAP amplitude at last clinical follow-up compared to pre-treatment baseline. Most infants were treated before 6 weeks of age (median = 34.5 DOL; range 11-180). Delays and barriers to treatment identified by treating clinicians followed two broad themes: medical and non-medical. Medical delays most commonly reported were presence of AAV9 antibodies and elevated troponin I levels. Non-medical barriers included delays in obtaining insurance as well as insurance policies regarding specific treatment modalities. DISCUSSION: The findings from the NYS cohort of newborn screen-identified infants are consistent with other reports of improved outcomes from early diagnosis and treatment. Additional biomarkers of motor neuron health including electromyography can potentially be helpful in detecting pre-clinical decline.
© 2022 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35835557      PMCID: PMC9576300          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   11.800


  32 in total

1.  Electrophysiological and motor function scale association in a pre-symptomatic infant with spinal muscular atrophy type I.

Authors:  Richard S Finkel
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 4.296

2.  Single-Dose Gene-Replacement Therapy for Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Authors:  Jerry R Mendell; Samiah Al-Zaidy; Richard Shell; W Dave Arnold; Louise R Rodino-Klapac; Thomas W Prior; Linda Lowes; Lindsay Alfano; Katherine Berry; Kathleen Church; John T Kissel; Sukumar Nagendran; James L'Italien; Douglas M Sproule; Courtney Wells; Jessica A Cardenas; Marjet D Heitzer; Allan Kaspar; Sarah Corcoran; Lyndsey Braun; Shibi Likhite; Carlos Miranda; Kathrin Meyer; K D Foust; Arthur H M Burghes; Brian K Kaspar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Infantile-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Authors:  Richard S Finkel; Eugenio Mercuri; Basil T Darras; Anne M Connolly; Nancy L Kuntz; Janbernd Kirschner; Claudia A Chiriboga; Kayoko Saito; Laurent Servais; Eduardo Tizzano; Haluk Topaloglu; Már Tulinius; Jacqueline Montes; Allan M Glanzman; Kathie Bishop; Z John Zhong; Sarah Gheuens; C Frank Bennett; Eugene Schneider; Wildon Farwell; Darryl C De Vivo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Motor milestone assessment of infants with spinal muscular atrophy using the hammersmith infant neurological Exam-Part 2: Experience from a nusinersen clinical study.

Authors:  Kathie M Bishop; Jacqueline Montes; Richard S Finkel
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Risdiplam in Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Authors:  Giovanni Baranello; Basil T Darras; John W Day; Nicolas Deconinck; Andrea Klein; Riccardo Masson; Eugenio Mercuri; Kristy Rose; Muna El-Khairi; Marianne Gerber; Ksenija Gorni; Omar Khwaja; Heidemarie Kletzl; Renata S Scalco; Timothy Seabrook; Paulo Fontoura; Laurent Servais
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Observational study of spinal muscular atrophy type I and implications for clinical trials.

Authors:  Richard S Finkel; Michael P McDermott; Petra Kaufmann; Basil T Darras; Wendy K Chung; Douglas M Sproule; Peter B Kang; A Reghan Foley; Michelle L Yang; William B Martens; Maryam Oskoui; Allan M Glanzman; Jean Flickinger; Jacqueline Montes; Sally Dunaway; Jessica O'Hagen; Janet Quigley; Susan Riley; Maryjane Benton; Patricia A Ryan; Megan Montgomery; Jonathan Marra; Clifton Gooch; Darryl C De Vivo
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Pilot study of population-based newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy in New York state.

Authors:  Jennifer N Kraszewski; Denise M Kay; Colleen F Stevens; Carrie Koval; Bianca Haser; Veronica Ortiz; Anthony Albertorio; Lilian L Cohen; Ritu Jain; Sarah P Andrew; Sally Dunaway Young; Nicole M LaMarca; Darryl C De Vivo; Michele Caggana; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  CMAP changes upon symptom onset and during treatment in spinal muscular atrophy patients: lessons learned from newborn screening.

Authors:  Wen-Chin Weng; Yu-Kan Hsu; Fu-Man Chang; Chun-Yen Lin; Wuh-Liang Hwu; Wang-Tso Lee; Ni-Chung Lee; Yin-Hsiu Chien
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Inheritance, Screening, and Counseling for the Obstetric Provider.

Authors:  Maeve K Hopkins; Lorraine Dugoff; Jeffrey A Kuller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.347

10.  Newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy in Germany: clinical results after 2 years.

Authors:  Katharina Vill; Oliver Schwartz; Heike Kölbel; Wolfgang Müller-Felber; Astrid Blaschek; Dieter Gläser; Uta Nennstiel; Brunhilde Wirth; Siegfried Burggraf; Wulf Röschinger; Marc Becker; Ludwig Czibere; Jürgen Durner; Katja Eggermann; Bernhard Olgemöller; Erik Harms; Ulrike Schara
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.123

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations for Interpreting and Reporting Silent Carrier and Disease-Modifying Variants in SMA Testing Workflows.

Authors:  John N Milligan; Laura Blasco-Pérez; Mar Costa-Roger; Marta Codina-Solà; Eduardo F Tizzano
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.141

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.