| Literature DB >> 35835158 |
Mei Zhang1, Yanhua Du2, Li Yang3, Lin Zhan4, Bin Yang4, Xueyong Huang5, Bianli Xu5, Koichi Morita6, Fuxun Yu7.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV) is a newly emerged virus that poses a great threat to human health because of high fatality rate.Entities:
Keywords: Monoclonal antibody; Recombinant nucleocapsid protein; Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35835158 PMCID: PMC9459026 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2022.102386
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Infect Dis ISSN: 1413-8670 Impact factor: 3.257
Fig. 1Preparation of monoclonal antibodies against rSFTSV-N protein. (A) BALB/C mice immune schedule. (B) Immunofluorescence analysis to verify the specificity of MAbs. SFTSV infected and mock Vero-E6 cells reacted with three MAbs and then detected by FITC labeled anti-mouse IgG and observed under an immunofluorescence microscope.
Fig. 2Western blot ananysis and isotype detection of MAbs. (A) Western-blot analysis of MAbs against rSFTSV-N protein. a: MAb 4A10; b: MAb 1C3; c: MAb 5G12. Lane 1: protein marker; lane 2: purified rSFTSV-N protein. (B) The antibody subclasses of three MAbs. The subclasses of the 3 MAbs were determined to be IgG2b and κ chain using a mouse MAb isotyping kit.
Comparation of MAb-based IgG sandwich ELISA with total antibody sandwich ELISA.
| Total antibody sandwich ELISA | MAb-based IgG sandwich ELISA | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||
| Positive | 85 | 0 | 85 |
| Negative | 0 | 30 | 30 |
| Total | 85 | 30 | 115 |
| Concordance | |||
(No. of samples positive by both methods + No. of samples negative by both methods)/total number of samples × 100.
Comparation of MAb-based IgG sandwich ELISA with rSFTSV-N protein based indirect IgG ELISA.
| MAb-based IgG sandwich ELISA | rSFTSV-N-IgG indirect ELISA | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||
| Positive | 85 | 0 | 85 |
| Negative | 0 | 30 | 30 |
| Total | 85 | 30 | 115 |
| Concordance | |||
(No. of samples positive by both methods + No. of samples negative by both methods)/total number of samples × 100.
Comparation of MAb-based IgM capture ELISA with total antibody sandwich ELISA.
| Total antibody sandwich ELISA | MAb-based IgM capture ELISA | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||
| Positive | 85 | 0 | 85 |
| Negative | 0 | 30 | 30 |
| Total | 85 | 30 | 115 |
| Concordance | |||
(No. of samples positive by both methods + No. of samples negative by both methods)/total number of samples × 100.
Comparation of MAb-based IgG sandwich ELISA with rSFTSV-N protein based indirect IgM ELISA.
| MAb-based IgM capture ELISA | rSFTSV-N-IgM indirect ELISA | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||
| Positive | 77 | 8 | 85 |
| Negative | 0 | 30 | 30 |
| Total | 77 | 38 | 115 |
| Concordance | |||
(No. of samples positive by both methods + No. of samples negative by both methods)/total number of samples × 100.