Literature DB >> 3583513

Changing approaches in women's health: new insights and new pitfalls in prenatal preventive care.

P Romito, F Hovelaque.   

Abstract

In this article, we contend that the standard definition of risk factors in pregnancy is not the neutral or technical process that women may assume it to be, but is colored by the prejudice of its context: a capitalist and patriarchal society. In such a society, only paid work is valued, and thus there is little study of the ill effects of housework on pregnant women; such a study would mean considering and possibly changing our sex-biased division of labor. Physicians and the mass media stress risk factors such as smoking, while omitting to mention that drugs prescribed by doctors are not always safe, and some are prescribed for years before-and even after-their harmful effects are known. Further examples are given from the field of childbirth, and we advance the hypothesis that, especially in fee-for-service medical systems, the physician can represent a risk factor. "Information" is often offered as the solution for pregnancy risks, the responsibility for this being the woman's. The mystification and narrowness of such a victim-blaming approach are evident. The key factor in prenatal preventive care is the mother's level of education: to admit this would be to acknowledge the need for change of a social system that keeps women in ignorance. We point out the limitations of the proposed individualistic solutions and conclude that, in redefining risk factors for women and their babies, we must analyze our society in feminist terms and in terms of social class.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior; Critique; Delivery Of Health Care; Economic Factors; Education; Health; Health Education; Health Personnel; Health Services; Maternal Health Services; Maternal-child Health Services; Medicine; Physicians; Prenatal Care; Preventive Medicine; Primary Health Care; Psychological Factors; Psychosocial Factors; Sex Role; Social Behavior; Socioeconomic Factors; Women's Status

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3583513     DOI: 10.2190/LX8E-D4D7-0D3D-2KLP

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Serv        ISSN: 0020-7314            Impact factor:   1.663


  3 in total

1.  Bad faith and victim-blaming: the limits of health promotion.

Authors:  C J Dougherty
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1993-11

2.  Designing prenatal care messages for low-income Mexican women.

Authors:  R Alcalay; A Ghee; S Scrimshaw
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Who cares for health? Social relations, gender, and the public health. Duncan Memorial Lecture.

Authors:  A Oakley
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.710

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.