PURPOSE: The response to cancer therapies is typically assessed with radiologic imaging 6-10 weeks after treatment initiation. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), however, has a short half-life, and dynamic changes in ctDNA quantity may allow for earlier assessment of the therapeutic response. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors referred to the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were invited to participate in a liquid biopsy protocol for which serial blood samples were collected before, during, and after systemic therapy. We isolated ctDNA from serially collected plasma samples at baseline, mid-treatment, and first restaging. Genomically informed droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was performed, and ctDNA quantities were reported as aggregate variant allele frequencies for all detected molecular aberrations. RESULTS: We included 204 patients receiving 260 systemic therapies. The ctDNA detection rate was higher in progressors (patients with progressive disease) compared with nonprogressors (patients with stable disease, partial responses, or complete responses) at all time points (P < .009). Moreover, ctDNA detection was associated with a shorter median time-to-treatment failure (P ≤ .001). Positive delta and slope values for changes in ctDNA quantity were more frequent in progressors (P ≤ .03 and P < .001, respectively) and were associated with a shorter median time-to-treatment failure (P ≤ .014 and P < .001, respectively). Increasing ctDNA quantity was predictive of clinical and/or radiologic progressive disease in 73% of patients (median lead time, 23 days). CONCLUSION: Detection of ctDNA and early dynamic changes in its quantity can predict the clinical outcomes of systemic therapies in patients with advanced solid tumors.
PURPOSE: The response to cancer therapies is typically assessed with radiologic imaging 6-10 weeks after treatment initiation. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), however, has a short half-life, and dynamic changes in ctDNA quantity may allow for earlier assessment of the therapeutic response. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors referred to the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were invited to participate in a liquid biopsy protocol for which serial blood samples were collected before, during, and after systemic therapy. We isolated ctDNA from serially collected plasma samples at baseline, mid-treatment, and first restaging. Genomically informed droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was performed, and ctDNA quantities were reported as aggregate variant allele frequencies for all detected molecular aberrations. RESULTS: We included 204 patients receiving 260 systemic therapies. The ctDNA detection rate was higher in progressors (patients with progressive disease) compared with nonprogressors (patients with stable disease, partial responses, or complete responses) at all time points (P < .009). Moreover, ctDNA detection was associated with a shorter median time-to-treatment failure (P ≤ .001). Positive delta and slope values for changes in ctDNA quantity were more frequent in progressors (P ≤ .03 and P < .001, respectively) and were associated with a shorter median time-to-treatment failure (P ≤ .014 and P < .001, respectively). Increasing ctDNA quantity was predictive of clinical and/or radiologic progressive disease in 73% of patients (median lead time, 23 days). CONCLUSION: Detection of ctDNA and early dynamic changes in its quantity can predict the clinical outcomes of systemic therapies in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Authors: J Tie; I Kinde; Y Wang; H L Wong; J Roebert; M Christie; M Tacey; R Wong; M Singh; C S Karapetis; J Desai; B Tran; R L Strausberg; L A Diaz; N Papadopoulos; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein; P Gibbs Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Maria C Schwaederlé; Sandip P Patel; Hatim Husain; Megumi Ikeda; Richard B Lanman; Kimberly C Banks; AmirAli Talasaz; Lyudmila Bazhenova; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Kezhong Chen; Heng Zhao; Yanbin Shi; Fan Yang; Lien Tu Wang; Guannan Kang; Yuntao Nie; Jun Wang Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Chetan Bettegowda; Mark Sausen; Rebecca J Leary; Isaac Kinde; Yuxuan Wang; Nishant Agrawal; Bjarne R Bartlett; Hao Wang; Brandon Luber; Rhoda M Alani; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Nilofer S Azad; Alberto Bardelli; Henry Brem; John L Cameron; Clarence C Lee; Leslie A Fecher; Gary L Gallia; Peter Gibbs; Dung Le; Robert L Giuntoli; Michael Goggins; Michael D Hogarty; Matthias Holdhoff; Seung-Mo Hong; Yuchen Jiao; Hartmut H Juhl; Jenny J Kim; Giulia Siravegna; Daniel A Laheru; Calogero Lauricella; Michael Lim; Evan J Lipson; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; George J Netto; Kelly S Oliner; Alessandro Olivi; Louise Olsson; Gregory J Riggins; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Kerstin Schmidt; le-Ming Shih; Sueli Mieko Oba-Shinjo; Salvatore Siena; Dan Theodorescu; Jeanne Tie; Timothy T Harkins; Silvio Veronese; Tian-Li Wang; Jon D Weingart; Christopher L Wolfgang; Laura D Wood; Dongmei Xing; Ralph H Hruban; Jian Wu; Peter J Allen; C Max Schmidt; Michael A Choti; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Luis A Diaz Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Filip Janku; Helen J Huang; Bart Claes; Gerald S Falchook; Siqing Fu; David Hong; Nishma M Ramzanali; Giovanni Nitti; Goran Cabrilo; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Aung Naing; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Jennifer J Wheler; Daniel D Karp; Veronica R Holley; Ralph G Zinner; Vivek Subbiah; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Scott Kopetz; Michael J Overman; Bryan K Kee; Sapna Patel; Benoit Devogelaere; Erwin Sablon; Geert Maertens; Gordon B Mills; Razelle Kurzrock; Funda Meric-Bernstam Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Sarah B Goldberg; Azeet Narayan; Adam J Kole; Roy H Decker; Jimmitti Teysir; Nicholas J Carriero; Angela Lee; Roxanne Nemati; Sameer K Nath; Shrikant M Mane; Yanhong Deng; Nitin Sukumar; Daniel Zelterman; Daniel J Boffa; Katerina Politi; Scott N Gettinger; Lynn D Wilson; Roy S Herbst; Abhijit A Patel Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Hatim Husain; Vladislava O Melnikova; Karena Kosco; Brian Woodward; Soham More; Sandeep C Pingle; Elizabeth Weihe; Ben Ho Park; Muneesh Tewari; Mark G Erlander; Ezra Cohen; Scott M Lippman; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-04-18 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: S Hrebien; V Citi; I Garcia-Murillas; R Cutts; K Fenwick; I Kozarewa; R McEwen; J Ratnayake; R Maudsley; T H Carr; E C de Bruin; G Schiavon; M Oliveira; N Turner Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: E E Dumbrava; S G Call; H J Huang; A L Stuckett; K Madwani; A Adat; D S Hong; S A Piha-Paul; V Subbiah; D D Karp; S Fu; A Naing; A M Tsimberidou; S L Moulder; K H Koenig; C H Barcenas; B K Kee; D R Fogelman; E S Kopetz; F Meric-Bernstam; F Janku Journal: ESMO Open Date: 2021-08-31