Literature DB >> 35833975

[Anatomical fracture endoprosthesis-who and how?]

Florian Freislederer1, Raphael Trefzer2, Stephan Radzanowski2, Fabrizio Moro2, Markus Scheibel2,3.   

Abstract

The aim of this review article is to present the indications for an anatomical fracture prosthesis, mostly as a shoulder hemiprosthesis (SHEP) and its value in comparison to other procedures. The healing of the tuberosities in the anatomical position and an intact rotator cuff are particularly important for the successful implantation of a SHEP after proximal humeral fractures. For older patients (> 70 years), the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty achieves more reliable results and is associated with a lower revision rate. The indications for implantation of a SHEP in non-reconstructible proximal humeral fractures, usually with a head split, should be carefully considered and can be used in cases with well-preserved large tuberosities and in younger patients. Complications of SHEP, such as secondary rotator cuff insufficiency, tuberosity dislocation or resorption and secondary glenoid wear, can be treated using a conversion or a change to reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemiarthroplasty; Humerus; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Rotator cuff; Shoulder

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35833975     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-022-01212-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)        ISSN: 2731-7021


  43 in total

Review 1.  Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dave R Shukla; Steven McAnany; Jun Kim; Sam Overley; Bradford O Parsons
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Mika Palvanen; Pekka Kannus; Seppo Niemi; Jari Parkkari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparative study of functional and radiological outcomes in the treatment of acute proximal humerus fracture.

Authors:  P Baudi; G Campochiaro; F Serafini; G Gazzotti; G Matino; C Rovesta; F Catani
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-03-23

Review 4.  Meta-analysis suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humerus fractures is a better option than hemiarthroplasty in the elderly.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Yanbin Zhu; Fei Zhang; Wei Chen; Ye Tian; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Derek J Cuff; Derek R Pupello
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Matthew J Boyle; Seung-Min Youn; Christopher M A Frampton; Craig M Ball
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  C M Court-Brown; A Garg; M M McQueen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-08

Review 8.  Management options for proximal humerus fractures - A systematic review & network meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Authors:  Martin S Davey; Eoghan T Hurley; Utkarsh Anil; Saorise Condren; Jack Kearney; Cathal O'Tuile; Mohammed Gaafar; Hannan Mullett; Leo Pauzenberger
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Brian D Solberg; Charles N Moon; Dennis P Franco; Guy D Paiement
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  B Kristiansen; G Barfod; J Bredesen; J Erin-Madsen; B Grum; M W Horsnaes; J R Aalberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1987-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.