| Literature DB >> 35833156 |
Ibrahim H Elkhidir1, Shahd S Ali1, Waad K Ali1, Hind R Madani1, Rawya A Basheir1, Rayan M Altayeb1, Rayan H S Shazali1, Safaa Fadlelmoula1, Wisal M Eltayeb1, Zeina I Omar1, Mahmoud Elnil1, Sagad O O Mohamed1.
Abstract
Background Sickle cell disease (SCD) is associated with oxidative stress due to an imbalance between production and elimination of the reactive oxygen species. It has been reported that SCD patients are at risk of multiple micronutrients' deficiencies, including several trace elements involved in the antioxidation mechanisms. We aimed to assess the status of these micronutrients in SCD patients. Methods This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The databases of MedLine, Embase, and PsycInfo were used for the systematic search from time the databases existed until April 2021. A total of 36 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. We calculated the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of serum zinc, magnesium, or copper levels among patients with SCD and their healthy controls. Results SCD patients had significantly lower zinc (SMD = -1.27 [95% CI: 1.67-0.87, p 0.001]) and magnesium levels (SMD = -0.53 [95% CI: 1.0-0.06, p 0.026] than their controls. Copper level was found to be significantly higher in SCD patients, with SMD = 0.68 (95% CI: 0.05-1.32, p 0.004). Conclusion This review showed that SCD patients may potentially prompt to have lower zinc and magnesium levels and higher copper levels compared with those without the disease. Future research need to be directed to investigate clinical outcome of nutritional difficiencies in patients with SCD, as well as the possibility of implementing nutritional supplement programs which may help minimizing the harmful effects of the disease on human body. Syrian American Medical Society. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).Entities:
Keywords: SCD; copper; magnesium; sickle cell; zinc
Year: 2022 PMID: 35833156 PMCID: PMC9272455 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749612
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Med ISSN: 2231-0770
Fig. 1The flow diagram for the process of study selection.
Data of zinc between sickle cell disease patient(s) and non–sickle cell disease patient(s)
| Study | Location | Design | Sickle cell disease patient(s) | Non–sickle cell disease patient(s) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD |
| Mean | SD |
| |||
|
Akinkugbe and Ette (1987)
| Africa | Cross-sectional | 53.45 | 25.19 | 40 | 79 | 61.6 | 20 |
|
Alayash et al (1987)
| Asia | Cross-sectional | 113 | 35.9 | 57 | 117.43 | 34.1 | 45 |
|
Al-Naama et al (2016)
| Asia | Cross-sectional | 62.2 | 12.6 | 42 | 94.2 | 12.5 | 50 |
| Antwi-Boasiako et al (2019) | Africa | Cross-sectional | 66.5 | 5.8 | 34 | 101.4 | 9.4 | 50 |
|
Bashir (1995)
| Asia | Cross-sectional | 85.6 | 10.3 | 15 | 107.2 | 11.7 | 25 |
|
Canellas et al (2012)
| The United States | Cross-sectional | 60 | 10 | 43 | 80 | 20 | 60 |
|
Emokpae et al (2019)
| Africa | Case control | 46.26 | 1.986 | 74 | 54.6 | 1.237 | 50 |
|
Hasanato et al (2019)
| Asia | Cross-sectional | 65.5 | 22.5926 | 33 | 94 | 13.75 | 33 |
|
Karayalcin et al (1979)
| The United States | Cross-sectional | 114.9 | 22.2 | 46 | 133.63 | 24.36 | 46 |
|
Karayalcin-zinc et al (1974)
| The United States | Cross-sectional | 116 | 33 | 50 | 177 | 49 | 50 |
|
Kehinde et al (2011)
| Africa | Cross-sectional | 70 | 6 | 20 | 70 | 7 | 20 |
|
Kilinç et al (1991)
| Europe | Case control | 58 | 18.6529 | 20 | 96.4 | 22.8 | 20 |
|
Kudirat et al (2019)
| Africa | Descriptive longitidual | 23.4 | 7.4 | 70 | 48.9 | 14.4 | 70 |
|
Kuvibidila et al (2006)
| The United States | Case control | 96.1 | 20.5 | 90 | 95.1 | 46.1 | 82 |
|
Olaniyi et al (2010)
| Africa | Case control | 1320 | 230 | 59 | 1170 | 200 | 35 |
|
Oliveira et al (2001)
| The United States | Case control | 85.15 | 32.18 | 34 | 108.45 | 22.89 | 20 |
|
Onukwuli et al (2018)
| Africa | Cross-sectional, case control | 58.01 | 10.58 | 81 | 68.37 | 8.67 | 81 |
|
Oztas et al (2012)
| Europe | Case control | 158.3 | 13.8 | 15 | 154.1 | 22.4 | 10 |
|
Phebus et al (1988)
| The United States | Case control | 76.3 | 8.9 | 56 | 82.2 | 9.8 | 44 |
| Prasad et al (1976) | The United States | Case control | 104 | 10.5 | 84 | 113 | 13.6 | 70 |
|
Smith et al (2019)
| Africa | Cross-sectional | 101 | 13.4683 | 80 | 105.7 | 11.5 | 80 |
|
Wasnik et al (2017)
| Asia | Cross-sectional | 83.09 | 9.26 | 33 | 104.06 | 6.27 | 33 |
|
Yousif et al (2018)
| Asia | Case control | 67.25 | 17.78 | 87 | 90.34 | 16.38 | 90 |
|
Yuzbasiyan et al (1989)
| The United States | Case control | 87 | 17 | 7 | 83 | 17 | 8 |
|
Arinola et al (2008)
| Africa | Case control | 11.2545 | 5.66609 | 44 | 15.94 | 5.51066 | 50 |
|
Arcasoy et al (2001)
| Europe | Case control | 77.3 | 15.74 | 10 | 90.04 | 13.83 | 20 |
|
Durosinmi et al (1993)
| Africa | Case control | 2.89 | 0.73 | 18 | 5.21 | 1.97 | 27 |
|
Sungu et al (2018)
| Africa | Case control | 0.27 | 0.58 | 76 | 1.64 | 0.14 | 76 |
Fig. 2Pooled SMD of zinc levels among patients with SCD. CI, confidence interval; SCD, sickle cell disease; SD, standard deviation; SMD, standardadized mean difference.
Data of magnesium between sickle cell disease patient(s) and non–sickle cell disease patient(s)
| Study | Location | Design | Sickle cell disease patient(s) | Non–sickle cell disease patient(s) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD |
| Mean | SD |
| |||
| Antwi-Boasiako et al (2019) | Africa | Case control | 0.79 | 0.25 | 79 | 0.90 | 0.11 | 48 |
|
Elshal et al (2012)
| Asia | Case control | 0.79 | 0.13 | 60 | 0.85 | 0.17 | 20 |
|
Khan (2003)
| Asia | Case control | 0.84 | 0.09 | 51 | 0.78 | 0.05 | 29 |
|
Kontessis et al (1992)
| Europe | Case control | 0.77 | 0.10 | 8 | 0.85 | 0.10 | 14 |
|
Olaniyi et al (2010)
| Africa | Case control | 0.39 | 0.09 | 59 | 0.38 | 0.08 | 35 |
|
Olukoga et al (1993)
| Africa | Case control | 0.76 | 0.10 | 25 | 0.83 | 0.15 | 25 |
| Prasad et al (1976) | The United States | Case control | 0.78 | 0.10 | 29 | 0.82 | 0.08 | 38 |
|
Sungu et al (2018)
| Africa | Case control | 0.13 | 0.02 | 76 | 0.42 | 0.21 | 76 |
|
Yousif et al (2018)
| Asia | Case control | 0.55 | 0.19 | 87 | 0.77 | 0.11 | 90 |
| Zehtabchi et al (2004) | The United States | Case control | 0.79 | 0.09 | 74 | 0.81 | 0.07 | 32 |
Fig. 3Pooled SMD of magnesium levels among patients with SCD. CI, confidence interval; SCD, sickle cell disease; SD, standard deviation; SMD, standardadized mean difference.
Data of copper between sickle cell disease patient(s) and non–sickle cell disease patient(s)
| Study | Location | Design | Sickle cell disease patient(s) | Non–sickle cell disease patient(s) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD |
| Mean.c | SD |
| |||
|
Akinkugbe and Ette (1987)
| Africa | Cross-sectional | 70.40 | 42.62 | 40 | 89.30 | 61.30 | 20 |
|
Alayash et al (1987)
| Asia | Cross-sectional | 144.93 | 44.09 | 57 | 148.40 | 44.40 | 45 |
|
Al-Naama et al, (2016)
| Asia | Cross-sectional | 145.50 | 14.30 | 42 | 100.90 | 13.50 | 50 |
| Antwi-Boasiako et al, 2019 | Africa | Cross-sectional | 220.90 | 27.80 | 34 | 114.00 | 16.30 | 50 |
|
Bashir (1995)
| Asia | Cross-sectional | 131.30 | 11.50 | 15 | 109.00 | 15.10 | 25 |
|
Canellas et al (2012)
| The United States | Cross-sectional | 120.00 | 10.00 | 43 | 100.00 | 10.00 | 60 |
|
Emokpae et al (2019)
| Africa | Case control | 105.80 | 2.46 | 74 | 102.60 | 1.59 | 50 |
|
Erhabor et al (2019)
| Africa | Case control | 40.40 | 9.66 | 45 | 75.60 | 6.50 | 25 |
|
Hasanato et al (2019)
| Asia | Cross-sectional | 131.67 | 15.56 | 33 | 88.00 | 10.50 | 33 |
|
kehinde et al (2011)
| Africa | Cross-sectional | 6.00 | 2.00 | 20 | 7.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
|
Kilinç et al (1991)
| Europe | Case control | 133.80 | 64.67 | 20 | 168.70 | 39.30 | 20 |
|
Mukuku et al (2018)
| Africa | Case control | 172.00 | 15.00 | 76 | 189.00 | 20.00 | 76 |
|
Olaniyi et al (2010)
| Africa | Case control | 67.00 | 10.10 | 59 | 68.50 | 10.00 | 35 |
|
Oztas et al (2012)
| Europe | Case control | 95.90 | 9.90 | 15 | 96.30 | 9.10 | 10 |
| Prasad et al, 1976 | The United States | Case control | 126.00 | 25.00 | 41 | 116.00 | 19.00 | 60 |
|
Smith et al (2019)
| Africa | Cross-sectional | 144.00 | 17.09 | 80 | 116.00 | 27.70 | 80 |
|
Yousif et al (2018)
| Asia | Case control | 142.35 | 49.92 | 87 | 109.66 | 24.42 | 90 |
Fig. 4Pooled SMD of copper levels among patients with SCD. CI, confidence interval; SCD, sickle cell disease; SD, standard deviation; SMD, standardadized mean difference.