| Literature DB >> 35833126 |
Vincenzo Venerito1, Giuseppe Lopalco1, Anna Abbruzzese1, Sergio Colella1, Maria Morrone1, Sabina Tangaro2,3, Florenzo Iannone1.
Abstract
Background: Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) is a multifactorial disease, and predicting remission is challenging. Machine learning (ML) is a promising tool for building multi-parametric models to predict clinical outcomes. We aimed at developing a ML algorithm to predict the probability of remission in PsA patients on treatment with Secukinumab (SEC).Entities:
Keywords: axial; fibromyalgia (FMS); machine learning; psoriatic arthritis (PsA); secukinumab
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35833126 PMCID: PMC9271870 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.917939
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Patient Characteristics.
| Patient Characteristics | Secukinumab Baseline | 12-month follow-up | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Av.Obs. | Av.Obs | |||||
| Age, mean (SD) | 117 | 52.74 | 10.37 | |||
| Female, n (%) | 119 | 66 | 55.46 | |||
| BMI, years, mean (SD) | 119 | 27.61 | 5.31 | |||
| Disease duration, years, mean (SD) | 119 | 7.41 | 4.44 | |||
| Axial Disease, n (%) | 119 | 41 | 34.45 | |||
| Active Dactylitis, n (%) | 119 | 37 | 31.09 | |||
| Active Psoriasis, n (%) | 119 | 107 | 89.92 | |||
| Polyarticular, n (%) | 119 | 30 | 25.21 | |||
| CRP, mg/L, mean (SD) | 113 | 7.77 | 15.09 | 113 | 5.59 | 5.52 |
| ESR, mm/h, mean (SD) | 115 | 17.34 | 15.53 | 115 | 16.82 | 12.57 |
| MetSyn, n (%) | 119 | 69 | 57.98 | |||
| FMS, n (%) | 119 | 24 | 20.17 | |||
| DAPSA, mean (SD) | 119 | 16.80 | 9.65 | 119 | 9.60* | 7.80 |
| DAPSA Remission, mean (SD) | 119 | 30 | 25.21 | |||
| LEI, median (IQR) | 114 | 0 | 0-1 | 112 | 0** | 0-0 |
| HAQ-DI, mean (SD) | 117 | 1 | 0.07 | 117 | 0.98 | 0.07 |
| HAQ-DI improvement ≥ 0.35, n (%) | 117 | 22 | 18.49 | |||
| PASI, mean (SD) | 119 | 2.22 | 3.11 | 119 | 0.84* | 1.74 |
| BASDAI, mean (SD) | 41 | 4.60 | 2.07 | 41 | 3.80*** | 1.97 |
| Steroid, n (%) | 119 | 54 | 45.38 | 119 | 25**** | 21.01 |
| Combotherapy, n (%) | 119 | 74 | 62.18 | |||
| Methotrexate, n (%) | 74 | 57 | 77,0 | |||
| Sulfasalazine, n (%) | 74 | 13 | 17.57 | |||
| Leflunomide, n (%) | 74 | 4 | 5.40 | |||
| bDMARD treatment 1st line, n (%) | 119 | 27 | 22.69 | |||
| bDMARD treatment 2nd line, n (%) | 119 | 29 | 24.37 | |||
| bDMARD treatment 3rd line and beyond, n (%) | 119 | 63 | 52.94 | |||
| Secukinumab 300mg/4 weeks, n(%) | 119 | 109 | 91.60 | |||
Av.Obs., Available Observations; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; bDMARD, biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; BMI, Body Mass Index; CRP, C Reactive Protein; DAPSA, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis; ESR, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate; FMS, Fibromylagia; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index; LEI, Leeds Enthesitis Index; MetSyn, Metabolic Syndrome; PASI, Psoriasis Area Severity Index; SD, Standard Deviation.
*<0.0001.
**0.0008.
***0.0006.
****0.0001.
Figure 1Plot of the feature importance of the attribute core set of eXtreme Gradient Boosting. CRP, C Reactive Protein; DAPSA, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis; ESR, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate; FMS, Fibromyalgia; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index; LEI, Leeds Enthesitis Index; PASI, Psoriasis Area Severity Index; XGBoost: eXtreme Gradient Boosting.
Odds Ratios of Logistic Regression for Multivariable Analysis after Random Feature Elimination.
| OR | 95%CI | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI | 0.79 | 0.66 | 0.94 | 0.01 |
| HAQ-DI at Baseline | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.45 | 0.003 |
| Baseline csDMARD | 0.43 | 0.19 | 0.98 | 0.045 |
| DAPSA at Baseline | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.93 | 0.001 |
| PASI at Baseline | 0.62 | 0.45 | 0.85 | 0.003 |
| CRP at Baseline (mg/l) | 1.08 | 1.03 | 1.13 | 0.002 |
| FMS | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 0.02 |
| Axial disease | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.19 | <0.001 |
BMI, Body Mass Index; CRP, C Reactive Protein; DAPSA, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis; ESR, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate; FMS, Fibromyalgia; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index; LEI, Leeds Enthesitis Index; MetSyn, Metabolic Syndrome; PASI, Psoriasis Area Severity Index; SD, Standard Deviation.
Figure 2Area under receiver operating characteristic curve of the algorithms. Left panel, eXtreme Gradient Boosting. Right Panel, Logistic Regression.
Algorithm performance.
| Cut-off | Accuracy | SD | Recall | SD | Precision | SD | AUROC | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 0.42 | 0.73 | 0.09 | 0.64 | 0.11 | 0.85 | 0.09 | 0.78 | 0.14 |
| XGBoost* | 0.82 | 0.97 | 0.06 | 0.96 | 0.006 | 0.97 | 0.06 | 0.97 | 0.07 |
*p<0.0001.
LR, Logistic Regression; SD, Standard Deviation; XGBoost, eXtreme Gradient Boosting.
Figure 3A diagnostic calibration has been plotted for XGBoost after 10-fold isotonic calibration; DAPSA remission roughly happened with an observed relative frequency consistent with the forecast value, showing a suitable calibration curve. DAPSA, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis; XGBoost, eXtreme Gradient Boosting.