| Literature DB >> 35833116 |
Zhaoliang Huang1, Xinghua Pang1, Tingting Zhong1, Tailong Qu1, Na Chen1, Shun Ma2, Xinrong He2, Dennis Xia3, Max Wang4, Michelle Xia5, Baiyong Li1.
Abstract
Background: IgG4 anbibodies are deficient in stability and may contribute to tumor-associated escape from immune surveillance. We developed an IgG1 backbone anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody, penpulimab, which is designed to remove crystallizable fragment (Fc) gamma receptor (FcγR) binding that mediates antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) and proinflammatory cytokine release.Entities:
Keywords: Fc engineering; IgG1 anti-PD-1 antibody; binding kinetics; immune-related adverse events; penpulimab
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35833116 PMCID: PMC9272907 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.924542
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 1(A) Aggregates tested by size exclusion chromatography (SEC), (B) melting (Tm) and (C) aggregation temperature (Tagg) characterization using dynamic light scattering (DLS) and static light scattering (SLS), respectively, and (D) Host-cell protein (HCP) residue assay in penpulimab and other IgG4 backbone anti-PD1 antibodies.
Affinity of penpulimab for FcγRIa, FcγRIIa_R131, FcγRIIa_H131, FcγRIIIa_V158, FcγRIIIa_F158 and C1q.
| Sample | KD (M) | kon(1/Ms) | kdis(1/s) | Rmax(nm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| AK105 (hG4) | 8.25E-09 | 5.79E+05 | 4.78E-03 | 0.50-0.54 |
| AK105 (hG1WT) | 3.35E-09 | 6.36E+05 | 2.13E-03 | 0.60-0.67 | |
| Penpulimab | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
|
| AK105 (hG4) | 3.13E-08 | 3.50E+05 | 1.10E-02 | 0.21-0.46 |
| AK105 (hG1WT) | 3.46E-08 | 6.60E+05 | 2.28E-02 | 0.39-0.83 | |
| Penpulimab | 2.32E-07 | 4.04E+05 | 9.38E-02 | 0.19-0.35 | |
|
| AK105 (hG4) | 5.07E-08 | 2.57E+05 | 1.30E-02 | 0.18-0.35 |
| AK105 (hG1WT) | 5.74E-08 | 4.65E+05 | 2.67E-02 | 0.82-1.12 | |
| Penpulimab | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
|
| AK105 (hG4) | 2.35E-05 | 3.56E+03 | 8.37E-02 | 2.68-8.68 |
| AK105 (hG1WT) | 1.97E-07 | 1.67E+05 | 3.29E-02 | 1.50-1.66 | |
| Penpulimab | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
|
| AK105 (hG4) | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| AK105 (hG1WT) | 2.38E-07 | 1.68E+05 | 4.00E-02 | 0.28-0.57 | |
| Penpulimab | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
|
| AK105 (hG4) | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| AK105 (hG1WT) | 1.84E-09 | 5.64E+06 | 1.04E-02 | 0.26-0.39 | |
| Penpulimab | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
ND, not detected. AK105 (hG1WT), a version of penpulimab with wildtype IgG1 backbone. AK105 (hG4), a IgG4 backbone version of penpulimab.
Figure 2(A) Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) activities of penpulimab and nivolumab were determined by measuring lactase dehydrogenase (LDH) release from 293T-PD1 cells. (B) Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) activities of penpulimab, penpulimab (hG1WT), a version of penpulimab with wildtype IgG1 backbone, and nivolumab were determined by measuring LDH release from CHO-K1-PD1-CTLA4 cells. (C) Antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) activities of penpulimab (hG1WT), penpulimab, and nivolumab were studied by examining phagocytosis of CHO-K1-PD1 cells by murine bone marrow derived macrophages (HPMMs). Effects of Fc engineering of penpulimab on the release of inflammatory cytokines. (D) IL-6 and (E) IL-8 by HPMMs in the presence of IFN-γ. Data are expressed as mean or mean ± SEM and analyzed using one-way ANOVA. *P<0.05 and ***P<0.001 vs. isotype control; ### P<0.001 vs. negative control.
Affinity of penpulimab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab for PD1-hFc.
| Antigen | Method | Antibodies | KD (M) | kon (1/Ms) | kdis (1/s) | Rmax (RU) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Biacore | Penpulimab | 5.88E-10 | 1.62E+05 | 9.51E-05 | 32.52-46.80 |
| Nivolumab | 5.40E-10 | 4.50E+05 | 2.43E-04 | 33.97-48.01 | ||
| Pembrolizumab | 7.17E-10 | 3.91E+05 | 2.80E-04 | 44.84-63.91 |
Figure 3(A) PD-L1 target occupancy following intravenous administration of 1.0, 3.0 or 10.0 mg/kg penpulimab once every two weeks (Q2W) in the dose escalation study or 200 mg penpulimab Q2W in the expansion study, with 28 days per cycle. Post-infusion blood samples were collected at day 1, 2, 8, and 15 of cycle 1, and day 1 of cycle 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13, respectively, as indicated on the x-axis. C: cycle; D: day. Penpulimab potentiates T cell activation via PD1/PDL1 blockade. Raji-PD-L1 cells overexpressing PD-L1 were co-cultured with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from a normal subject, and the production of IL-2 (B) and IFN-γ (C) was examined by ELISA. Data are shown as mean ± SEM for n = 2, and analyzed using one-way ANOVA. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 vs. isotype control.
Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in the study population.
| Preferred terms | R/R cHL*200 mg Q2W(N=94) | 200 mg Q2W | 200 mg Q3W in combination with other drugs#(N=77) | 200 mg and other doses$(N=465) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase Ib* (Australia)(N=83) | Chinese patients including cHL patients*(N=289) | All patients(N=372) | ||||
|
| 51 (54.3%) | 12 (14.5%) | 94 (32.5%) | 106 (28.5%) | 13 (16.9%) | 126 (27.1%) |
| 3 (3.2%) | 0 | 8 2.8%) | 8 (2.2%) | 3 (3.9%) | 12 (2.6%) | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 8 (8.5%) | 1 (1.2%) | 20 (6.9%) | 21 (5.6%) | 5 (6.5%) | 27 (5.8%) | |
| 4 (4.3%) | 0 | 6 (2.1%) | 6 (1.6%) | 3 (3.9%) | 9 (1.9%) | |
| 4 (4.3%) | 0 | 9 (3.1%) | 9 (2.4%) | 4 (5.2%) | 15 (3.2%) | |
|
| 0 | 0 | 2 (0.7) | 2 (0.5) | 0 | 3 (0.6) |
| ALT elevations | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 2 (0.4) |
| AST elevations | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 2 (0.4) |
| Transaminase abnormalities | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 1 (0.2) |
|
| 2 (2.1) | 0 | 4 (1.4) | 4 (1.1) | 2 (2.6) | 6 (1.3) |
| Psoriasis | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 1 (0.2) |
| Rashes | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 3 (1.0) | 3 (0.8) | 1 (1.3) | 4 (0.9) |
| Generalized rashes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.3) | 1 (0.2) |
|
| 1 (1.1) | 0 | 2 (0.7) | 2 (0.5) | 1 (1.3) | 3 (0.6) |
| Immune mediated pneumonitis | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 2 (0.7) | 2 (0.5) | 0 | 2 (0.4) |
| Pulmonary inflammation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.3) | 1 (0.2) |
|
| 1 (1.1) | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 1 (0.2) |
| Other nephrotoxicities | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 1 (0.2) |
| Kidney injury | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 1 (0.2) |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.3) | 2 (0.4) |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.3) | 2 (0.4) |
Data are expressed as N(%).
*R/R cHL patients in the AK105-201 study, Australian patients in the AK105-101 phase 1b study, and Chinese patients from Ak105-201, AK105-202, and AK105-204 trials.
#Patients from AK105-203 and AK105-301 (part I).
$Patients from AK105-101 (Phase 1a and 1b), AK105-201, AK105-202, AK105-203, AK105-204 and AK105-301 (part I).
cHL, classic Hodgkin lymphoma; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; irAEs, immune related adverse events; Q2W, once every two weeks; Q3W, once every three weeks; R/R cHL, refractory/relapsed cHL.
IgA nephropathy, refractory/relapsed cHL.