| Literature DB >> 35833077 |
Bin Zhang1, Li Xiao2, Hui Zhou1, Ming Li1, Jingming Wang3, Lina Guo3.
Abstract
In order to solve the application problem of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, this paper proposes application research based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the staging diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has a high value in evaluating the activity of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This paper discusses the correlation between hemodynamic parameters and omeractramris score, clinical laboratory indexes, and activity score (DAS28), analyzes its feasibility in evaluating the prognosis of RA, and provides a reliable basis for the rational formulation of an early RA treatment plan. After reviewing the previous cases, 33 patients with subclinical synovitis of RA were selected for wrist joint contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. The data were analyzed by contrast-enhanced software, and the quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced were obtained: start development time (AT), peak time (TTP), peak intensity (PI), grad gradient, and area under the curve (AUC). The synovial blood supply was classified by CEUS, and the CEUS blood supply classification and power Doppler (PDUS) blood supply classification were compared. The results of regression analysis showed that AUC (or = 1.026, 95% CI: 1.001-1.052) and PI (or = 1.561, 95% CI: 1.019-2.393) were independent risk factors for predicting the aggravation of the disease. The diagnostic efficacy of AUC and PI in predicting the aggravation of the disease was analyzed. The areas under the ROC curve of AUC and PI were 0.935 and 0.927, respectively, and the difference between them was not statistically significant.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35833077 PMCID: PMC9239753 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3055465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Figure 1Application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in staging diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.
ACR/EULARRA classification and scoring criteria.
| Joint involvement (0 “5 points) | 1 large joint0 points | 2–10 large joints1 point | 1–3 facets (with or without large joint involvement)2 points | 4–10 small joints (with or without large joint involvement)3 points | >10 joints (at least 1 facet)5 points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serology (0 ∼ 3 points) (at least one is required for diagnosis) | RF and ACPA {anti CCP antibody} (-)0 point | RF and/or ACPA {anti CCP antibody} low titer(+)2 point | RF and/or ACPA {anti CCP antibody} high titer(+)3 point | ||
| Course of synovitis (0–1 points) | Less than 6 weeks 0 point | 6 weeks or more 1point | |||
| Acute phase reaction (0 ∼ 1 point) | CRP and ESR were normal | Elevated CRP or ESR | |||
| (At least one is required for diagnosis) | 0 point | 1 point |
Comparison of RE (%) between RA clinical activity group, remission group, and control group.
| Group | Number of cases |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. RA activity group | 20 | 139.13 ± 7.78 | <0.05 |
| 2. RA remission group | 12 | 66.74 ± 9.55 | |
| 3. Healthy control group | 10 | 19.01 ± 3.60 |
Comparison of RE (%) between the three groups.
| Comparison group |
|
|---|---|
| Group 1 and 2 | 0.000 |
| Group 1 and 3 | 0.000 |
| Groups 2 and 3 | 0.000 |
Correlation between hemodynamic parameters and clinical activity score in active RA.
| Comparison group | Correlation coefficient (r value) |
|
|---|---|---|
| REE and DAS28 | 0.619 | 0.004 |
| RE and DAS28 | 0.707 | 0.000 |
MRI scoring system of RA wrist.
| MRI signs | Fraction | Lesion number | Maximum possible score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synovitis | 0, 1, 2, 3 | 3 | 9 |
| Bone marrow edema | 0, 1, 2 | 15 | 30 |
| Bone erosion | 0, 1, 2 | 15 | 30 |
| Tenosynovitis | 0, 1, 2 | 9 | 18 |
| Tendinitis | 0, 1 | 9 | 9 |
Figure 2ROC curve of peak intensity.