Literature DB >> 35832974

Clinical Efficacy of the Multilayered Skull Base Reconstruction Using In Situ Bone Flap in Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngioma.

Yuefei Zhou1, Yue Hei1, Jose M Soto2, Tao Jin3, Xiaofan Jiang1, Dongxia Feng2, Weiping Liu1, Dakuan Gao1.   

Abstract

Objective  The aim of the study is to summarize and analyze the efficacy of the multilayered skull base reconstruction using in situ bone flap in endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for craniopharyngiomas. Methods  A retrospective review of 65 patients who underwent resection of their histopathology confirmed craniopharyngiomas performed at a single institution. Based on the team's understanding and mastery of skull base reconstruction techniques, patients were divided into two groups according to the methods of reconstruction in two periods. First (March 2015 through August 2016), osseous reconstruction was not adopted and served as the control group (34 cases). Second (September 2016 through July 2019), in situ bone flap repair of the skull base (complete osseous reconstruction) served as observation group (31 cases). The length of hospitalization and nasal exudation, bed rest time of hospital discharge, the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leaks, lumbar drainage, and intracranial/pulmonary infections were collected and compared. Results  Compared with the control group, patients in the observation group had obviously less lumbar drainage and CSF leakage ( p  < 0.05), but had no significant difference in cases of re-operation, meningitis, and pulmonary infection. At the meantime, cases of nasal exudation, bed rest, and hospitalization of the observation group were significantly reduced ( p  < 0.05) in the observation group. Conclusion  The multilayered reconstruction technique (especially using in situ bone flap, combined with vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap) is a safe and effective method in achieving watertight closure after EEEA, and can significantly reduce the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leaks, and facilitate rehabilitation in skull base reconstruction of craniopharyngiomas. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSF leak; craniopharyngioma; extended endoscopic endonasal approach; multilayer; skull base reconstruction

Year:  2021        PMID: 35832974      PMCID: PMC9272260          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  21 in total

1.  Risk Factors Predicting Nasoseptal Flap Failure in the Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Approach.

Authors:  Boo-Young Kim; Ji Hyeon Shin; Sung Won Kim; Yong Kil Hong; Sin-Soo Jeun; Soo Whan Kim; Jin Hee Cho; Yong Jin Park
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 2.  Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: past, present and future.

Authors:  Paolo Castelnuovo; Iacopo Dallan; Paolo Battaglia; Maurizio Bignami
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Comparative integrated molecular analysis of intraocular medulloepitheliomas and central nervous system embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes confirms that they are distinct nosologic entities.

Authors:  Andrey Korshunov; Frederick A Jakobiec; Charles G Eberhart; Volker Hovestadt; David Capper; David T W Jones; Dominik Sturm; Anna M Stagner; Deepak P Edward; Ralph C Eagle; Alan D Proia; Arend Koch; Marina Ryzhova; Anastasia Ektova; Ulrich Schüller; Olga Zheludkova; Peter Lichter; Andreas von Deimling; Stefan M Pfister; Marcel Kool
Journal:  Neuropathology       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.906

Review 4.  Expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for extending suprasellar and third ventricular lesions.

Authors:  Giuliano Silveira-Bertazzo; Sunil Manjila; Ricardo L Carrau; Daniel M Prevedello
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 5.  Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas.

Authors:  Ricardo J Komotar; Robert M Starke; Daniel M S Raper; Vijay K Anand; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  The endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of craniopharyngiomas: a series of 103 patients.

Authors:  Luigi Maria Cavallo; Giorgio Frank; Paolo Cappabianca; Domenico Solari; Diego Mazzatenta; Alessandro Villa; Matteo Zoli; Alfonso Iodice D'Enza; Felice Esposito; Ernesto Pasquini
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  The 3F (Fat, Flap, and Flash) Technique For Skull Base Reconstruction After Endoscopic Endonasal Suprasellar Approach.

Authors:  Luigi M Cavallo; Domenico Solari; Teresa Somma; Paolo Cappabianca
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  International consensus statement on endoscopic skull-base surgery: executive summary.

Authors:  Eric W Wang; Paul A Gardner; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.858

9.  Graded repair of cranial base defects and cerebrospinal fluid leaks in transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  Felice Esposito; Joshua R Dusick; Nasrin Fatemi; Daniel F Kelly
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.703

10.  Evolution of the graded repair of CSF leaks and skull base defects in endonasal endoscopic tumor surgery: trends in repair failure and meningitis rates in 509 patients.

Authors:  Andrew Conger; Fan Zhao; Xiaowen Wang; Amalia Eisenberg; Chester Griffiths; Felice Esposito; Ricardo L Carrau; Garni Barkhoudarian; Daniel F Kelly
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 5.115

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.