Literature DB >> 35832968

Comparative Outcomes by Surgical Approach in Patients with Malignant Sinonasal Disease.

Nicholas R Lenze1, Carolyn Quinsey2, Deanna Sasaki-Adams2, Matthew G Ewend2, Brian D Thorp1,2, Charles S Ebert1, Adam M Zanation1,2.   

Abstract

Objective  There is a paucity of data on comparative outcomes for open versus endoscopic surgery for patients with malignant sinonasal pathology. Most of the available studies are limited by a sample size <100 patients. Design  This is a retrospective cohort study. Setting  The findings of this study come from a single-institution tertiary care center from 2008 to 2019. Participants  In total, 199 patients who underwent surgery for malignant sinonasal disease participated in this study. Main Outcome Measures  The main outcome measures were perioperative complications and reoperation. Results  Patients in our sample had a mean age of 59.7 years (SD, 20.4). In total, 62% were male and 72% were white. An endoscopic-only approach was used in 41% of patients and an open or combined approach in 59% of patients. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common pathology (43.0%), followed by sarcoma (9.5%), skin cancer (6.5%), sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (6.5%), and adenocarcinoma (5.5%). The all-cause complication rate was 14.6%. Patients with an open resection had a higher rate of intraoperative complications (5.9 vs. 0%; p  = 0.043), postoperative complications (19.5 vs. 3.7%; p  = 0.001), and all-cause complications (21.0 vs. 3.7%; p  < 0.001). The likelihood of early reoperation (<6 months) or late reoperation (>6 months) did not significantly differ by surgical approach ( p  = 1.000 and 0.741, respectively). Conclusion  The endoscopic approach for resection of malignant sinonasal disease is viable for select patients and may be associated with a favorable complication rate compared with the open approach. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intraoperative complications; postoperative complications; skull base neoplasms; treatment outcome

Year:  2021        PMID: 35832968      PMCID: PMC9272237          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  17 in total

1.  Long-term Outcome for Open and Endoscopically Resected Sinonasal Tumors.

Authors:  Jan Hagemann; Jana Roesner; Soenke Helling; Christian Jacobi; Johannes Doescher; Matthias Engelbarts; Julian Kuenzel; Philipp Krauss; Sven Becker; Christian Stephan Betz
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Therapy options and long-term results of sinonasal malignancies.

Authors:  Andreas Arnold; Panagiotis Ziglinas; Katharina Ochs; Nadine Alter; Andreas Geretschläger; Kurt Lädrach; Peter Zbären; Marco Caversaccio
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 5.337

3.  Surgical Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Open Resection for Primary Sinonasal Malignancy: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victor M Lu; Krishnan Ravindran; Kevin Phan; Jamie J Van Gompel; Timothy R Smith; Angela M Donaldson; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Rania A Mekary; Kaisorn L Chaichana
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.467

4.  Costs and Perioperative Outcomes Associated with Open versus Endoscopic Resection of Sinonasal Malignancies with Skull Base Involvement.

Authors:  Terence S Fu; Eric Monteiro; Ian Witterick; Allan Vescan; Gelareh Zadeh; Fred Gentili; John R de Almeida
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-06-30

5.  Surgical Management Patterns of Sinonasal Malignancy: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Qasim Husain; Rohan R Joshi; Jennifer R Cracchiolo; Benjamin R Roman; Ian Ganly; Viviane Tabar; Marc A Cohen
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-10-25

6.  Comparison of transnasal endoscopic and open craniofacial resection for malignant tumors of the anterior skull base.

Authors:  Jean Anderson Eloy; Richard J Vivero; Kimberly Hoang; Frank J Civantos; Donald T Weed; Jacques J Morcos; Roy R Casiano
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  An Algorithm for Surgical Approach to the Anterior Skull Base.

Authors:  Matthew R Naunheim; Neerav Goyal; Matthew M Dedmon; Kyle J Chambers; Ahmad R Sedaghat; Benjamin S Bleier; Eric H Holbrook; William T Curry; Stacey T Gray; Derrick T Lin
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-03-18

8.  Sinonasal malignancies: A population-based analysis of site-specific incidence and survival.

Authors:  Rahul Dutta; Pariket M Dubal; Peter F Svider; James K Liu; Soly Baredes; Jean Anderson Eloy
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Comparing endoscopic resection and open resection for management of sinonasal mucosal melanoma.

Authors:  Nicole I Farber; Richard D Bavier; Meghan M Crippen; Nishant Vatsa; Wayne D Hsueh; Jean Anderson Eloy
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.858

10.  Surgical outcomes of malignant sinonasal tumours: open versus endoscopic surgical approaches.

Authors:  B Saedi; M Aghili; M Motiee; S Valadkhani; A B Niazi; A Safavi
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 1.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.