The inner ear consists of auditory and vestibular organs. The vestibular organs include
maculae staticae, which are located in both the utricle and saccule, as well as semicircular
ducts and their ampullas[1]. Although there are
many reports of drug-induced hearing loss, there are few reports on toxicity affecting the
sense of equilibrium[2], [3]. Among these, streptomycin is reportedly toxic to
the auditory and equilibrium sensory organs, resulting in the degeneration of the otolithic
membrane and loss of otoliths in experimental animals[4], [5],
[6]. The clinical failure of the
sense of equilibrium and the loss of otoliths, the giant otolith in maculae staticae, and the
ectopic otolith in semicircular ducts, have been reported in ATP2b2KO and Pendred’s syndrome
model mice[7], [8]. However, specimen preparation methods for
vestibular organs, including maculae staticae or semicircular ducts, have not been reported.
In this study, we investigated highly reproducible methods to prepare vestibular organ
specimens for histopathological examinations.Five 10-week-old female ICR mice (Charles River Laboratories Japan, Inc., Kanagawa, Japan)
were used for the preliminary examination. The head was separated from the body for each
mouse, and the brain, mandible, eyes, skin, and muscles were removed from the head. The heads
were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin (NBF) and decalcified with K-CX solution. The
following five excision methods (Fig. 1) were compared:
Fig. 1.
Schema of dissecting direction (red line) of methods A–E (left figure). Structure of
labyrinth (right). Labels: Pituitary gland (p), Tympanic cavity (t), Trigeminal nerve
(tn). Maculae staticae (blue dots).
Schema of dissecting direction (red line) of methods A–E (left figure). Structure of
labyrinth (right). Labels: Pituitary gland (p), Tympanic cavity (t), Trigeminal nerve
(tn). Maculae staticae (blue dots).Method A: The head was dissected from the tympanic cavity to the contralateral anterior edge
of the orbit and sectioned inwardly (Fig. 2A).
(A–E) Schema of methods A–E, respectively. (A–D) Dissecting (dotted line) and
sectioning directions (arrow) (left). Dissected surface (right). (E) Dissecting (dotted
line) and sectioning directions (arrow) (left). Dissected surface (right). Labels:
Pituitary gland (p), Tympanic cavity (t), Trigeminal nerve (tn), Orbit (o). Bar=5
mm.Method B: The head was dissected along the trigeminal nerve and sectioned inwardly (Fig. 2B).Method C: The head was dissected from the tympanic cavity to the ipsilateral anterior edge of
the orbit and sectioned inwardly (Fig. 2C).Method D: The head was dissected transversely 2 mm from the posterior edge of the pituitary
gland and sectioned rostrally (Fig. 2D).Method E: The head was dissected transversely from the posterior edge of the pituitary gland
and sectioned caudally (Fig. 2E).With methods A, B, and C, the utricle, saccule, and parts of semicircular ducts were
observable; however, the ampulla of a semicircular duct was not (Fig. 3A–C). With method D, parts of semicircular ducts were observable at the dissected surface
(data not shown). The utricle, saccule, ampulla of a semicircular duct, and parts of
semicircular ducts were all simultaneously observable at 150 μm sectioned from the dissected
surface (Fig. 3D). However, the maculae staticae
disappeared after further 300 μm sectioning (Fig.
3D-300 μm). With method E, the maculae staticae were not observable from the dissected
surface (data not shown).
Fig. 3.
Specimens in low magnification (left) and the areas highlighted by squares in high
magnification (right). (A) Saccule and parts of semicircular ducts stained with
hematoxylin and eosin (HE). (B) Saccule, parts of semicircular ducts, and cochlea
stained with HE. (C) Utricle, saccule, and parts of semicircular ducts stained with HE.
(D) Utricle, saccule, the ampulla of a semicircular duct (arrowhead), and parts of
semicircular ducts stained with HE. (D-300 μm) All compartments of vestibular organs
disappeared after further 300 μm sectioning; stained with HE. Labels: Tympanic cavity
(t), Utricle (u), Saccule (s), Semicircular ducts (d), Cochlea (c).
Specimens in low magnification (left) and the areas highlighted by squares in high
magnification (right). (A) Saccule and parts of semicircular ducts stained with
hematoxylin and eosin (HE). (B) Saccule, parts of semicircular ducts, and cochlea
stained with HE. (C) Utricle, saccule, and parts of semicircular ducts stained with HE.
(D) Utricle, saccule, the ampulla of a semicircular duct (arrowhead), and parts of
semicircular ducts stained with HE. (D-300 μm) All compartments of vestibular organs
disappeared after further 300 μm sectioning; stained with HE. Labels: Tympanic cavity
(t), Utricle (u), Saccule (s), Semicircular ducts (d), Cochlea (c).Dissecting the heads transversely along the posterior edge of the pituitary gland as in
methods D and E was technically easier than dissecting them longitudinally or diagonally as in
methods A, B, and C. The results from methods D and E demonstrated that the maculae staticae
were located between the respective dissection sites. With method D, parts of semicircular
ducts were observable, and the maculae staticae disappeared immediately after further
sectioning. Therefore, sectioning from the posterior edge of the pituitary gland to the caudal
side, as in method E, was better for observing the maculae staticae with high reproducibility.
Using methods D and E, the morphologies of the left and right sides were different due to the
slope of the dissection. Therefore, we decided to use method Eʹ for the main study, which
involves dissecting the heads 1 mm from the posterior edge of the pituitary gland, dividing
them into right and left parts, and sectioning them towards the caudal side (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
Schema of dissecting direction of methods E and E′. The dissection site for method E′
was 1 mm posterior to that of method E. Dissection direction (red line). Maculae
staticae (blue dots).
Schema of dissecting direction of methods E and E′. The dissection site for method E′
was 1 mm posterior to that of method E. Dissection direction (red line). Maculae
staticae (blue dots).Two 28-week-old female FVB/N mice (CLEA Japan, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) were used in the main
study. The mice were perfusion-fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde systemically after systemic
perfusion with heparinized saline under isoflurane anesthesia. For each mouse, the head was
separated from the body, and the brain, mandible, eyes, skin, and muscles were removed from
the head. The heads were fixed with 10% NBF and decalcified using a K-CX solution. The heads
were dissected transversely 1 mm from the posterior edge of the pituitary gland (Fig. 5A) and sectioned caudally. All specimens were processed routinely, and intermittent, thin
sections every 20 μm from the dissected surface were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE).
All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the Chugai Pharmaceutical Guide for
the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and all experimental protocols were approved by the
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Fig. 5.
Histology at 160 μm sectioned from the dissected surface. (A) Dissecting direction
(dotted line) and sectioning direction (arrow) of method Eʹ. (B) The specimen in loupe
view stained with HE. (C) Overview of the vestibular organ; stained with HE. (D) The
saccule, including sensory epithelium, otolithic membrane, and otoliths stained with HE.
The utricle, including sensory epithelium, otolithic membrane, and otoliths stained with
HE. (F) The ampulla of a semicircular duct, including sensory epithelium stained with
HE. (G) Parts of semicircular ducts stained with HE. Labels: Utricle (u), Saccule (s),
Ampulla of semicircular duct (a), Semicircular ducts (d), Sensory epithelium (se),
Otoliths (o), Otolithic membrane (om).
Histology at 160 μm sectioned from the dissected surface. (A) Dissecting direction
(dotted line) and sectioning direction (arrow) of method Eʹ. (B) The specimen in loupe
view stained with HE. (C) Overview of the vestibular organ; stained with HE. (D) The
saccule, including sensory epithelium, otolithic membrane, and otoliths stained with HE.
The utricle, including sensory epithelium, otolithic membrane, and otoliths stained with
HE. (F) The ampulla of a semicircular duct, including sensory epithelium stained with
HE. (G) Parts of semicircular ducts stained with HE. Labels: Utricle (u), Saccule (s),
Ampulla of semicircular duct (a), Semicircular ducts (d), Sensory epithelium (se),
Otoliths (o), Otolithic membrane (om).In both animals, the utricle and saccule, including otoliths, the ampulla of a semicircular
duct, and parts of semicircular ducts, were observed on the dissected surface or at 260 μm
sectioned from the dissected surface, as in method D (Fig.
5B–G).By sectioning from the posterior edge of the pituitary gland to the caudal side, vestibular
organs, including the utricle, saccule, ampulla of a semicircular duct, and parts of
semicircular ducts were observed. When the head was dissected 1 mm from the posterior edge of
the pituitary gland, the maculae staticae were observed without deep sectioning. The sensory
epithelium at the maculae staticae and ampulla was evaluated in the preliminary and main
study. Since the maculae staticae are extremely small organs, intermittent serial sections
from the posterior edge of the pituitary gland should be made to avoid any loss of the maculae
staticae. This method is helpful for histopathological analysis of mice with symptoms of
abnormal equilibrium caused by medical toxicity and genetic modification.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.
Authors: Amiel A Dror; Yael Politi; Hashem Shahin; Danielle R Lenz; Silvia Dossena; Charity Nofziger; Helmut Fuchs; Martin Hrabé de Angelis; Markus Paulmichl; Steve Weiner; Karen B Avraham Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-05-04 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Marko Schirmer; Alexander Kaiser; Alina Lessenich; Sven Lindemann; Maren Fedrowitz; Manuela Gernert; Wolfgang Löscher Journal: Brain Res Date: 2007-04-11 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: P J Kozel; R A Friedman; L C Erway; E N Yamoah; L H Liu; T Riddle; J J Duffy; T Doetschman; M L Miller; E L Cardell; G E Shull Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1998-07-24 Impact factor: 5.157