| Literature DB >> 35832713 |
Sławomir Lewicki1, Monika Leśniak1, Agnieszka Sobolewska-Ruta2, Aneta Lewicka3, Marta Grodzik4, Eugeniusz K Machaj5, Marek Saracyn6, Jacek Z Kubiak1,7, Zygmunt Pojda8.
Abstract
Introduction: Cytokines are important immune modulator factors controlling homeostasis of the body and are involved in tissue regeneration after wound healing. The encapsulation of cytokines in liposomes has many advantages potentially useful for their transfer to the cells. Liposomes protect cytokines from neutralization, improving their pharmacokinetics or biologic activity in vivo. They are targeted to specific cell types and may delay the release of cytokines, allowing their sustained paracrine delivery. Their physicochemical characteristics such as size, shape, charge, and stability are important parameters improving bio-distribution and prolonged pharmacokinetics of encapsulated cytokines. Material and methods: We developed an efficient protocol for the encapsulation of two types of cytokines, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), in liposomes that can be stored long term in the active state.Entities:
Keywords: delivery to stem cells; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; liposomes; protein transfer to cells in vitro
Year: 2020 PMID: 35832713 PMCID: PMC9266718 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2020.94527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.707
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) concentration in phosphate-buffered saline presented as concentration in pg/ml and % of the control value (fresh defrosted G-CSF or GM-CSF solution)
| Factor | Mean [pg/ml] | SD | % of control |
|---|---|---|---|
| G-CSF solution in PBS | 10526 | 368 | 100.0 |
| G-CSF solution in PBS + Tween | 10896 | 467 | 103.5 |
| G-CSF liposomes in PBS + Tween | 9274 | 619 | 88.1 |
| G-CSF liposomes in PBS | 7904 | 237 | 75.1 |
| PBS after centrifugation | 5604 | 394 | 53.2 |
| Centrifugation-isolated liposomes | 1292 | 571 | 12.3 |
| Homogenized liposomes | 1314 | 388 | 12.5 |
| Homogenized liposomes + Tween | 1624 | 184 | 15.0 |
| GM-CSF solution in PBS | 10324 | 468 | 100.0 |
| GM-CSF solution in PBS + Tween | 10376 | 64 | 100.5 |
| GM-CSF liposomes in PBS + Tween | 8474 | 1750 | 82.1 |
| GM-CSF liposomes in PBS | 7058 | 1042 | 68.4 |
| PBS after centrifugation | 7132 | 988 | 69.1 |
| Centrifugation-isolated liposomes | 1386 | 580 | 13.4 |
| Homogenized liposomes | 7102 | 266 | 68.8 |
| Homogenized liposomes + Tween | 7330 | 158 | 71.0 |
G-CSF – granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, PBS – phosphate-buffered saline, GM-CSF – granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.
Mean percentage ± SD of cytokines encapsulated in different size liposomes
| Growth factor | Liposomes diameter | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤ 200 nm | 200–400 nm | ≤ 600 nm | Whole liposome population | |
| % of encapsulated cytokines | ||||
| GM-CSF | 15.3 ±1.8 | 32.0 ±8.6 | 47.4 ±20.1 | 100% |
| G-CSF | 17.6 ±2.2 | 28.3 ±6.7 | 42.9 ±10.5 | 100% |
GM-CSF – granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating, G-CSF – granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
Figure 1Effect of A – granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or B – granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) loaded liposomes on proliferation of umbilical cord stem cells cells as assessed by cell number, MTT, NR and SRB assays. Assays were performed in triplicate (n = 6). Results are shown as a mean percentage ± SD of control values. P – probability value, statistical significance p < 0.05
Figure 2The effect of liposome-encapsulated granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) cytokines on hematopoietic stem cell (CBHSC) proliferation. Liposomes (at final concentration 5%) were added to the H4230 methylcellulose medium without Epo (Stem Cell Technologies) (A) or to the H4330 methylcellulose medium without growth factors supplemented with Epo (B). Results are presented as number of granulocyte/macrophages (GM) (A) or BFU-E, Mix-CFU and GM-CU colonies (B). Results are shown as a mean ± SEM. Assays were performed in triplicate (n = 6). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
Figure 3The effect of temperature and time of storage on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (A) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (B) loaded liposomes. The concentration of cytokines extracted from liposomes was analyzed by ELISA test. Cytokine concentration was tested at the beginning of the experiment, and subsequently at the 1st, 7th, 14th, and 28th day of storage. Comparison between control solution and cytokine-loaded liposomes. P – probability value, statistical significance p < 0.05
Figure 4The effect of storage temperature of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (A) or granulocytemacrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (B) loaded liposomes on proliferation measured by cell count, MTT, NR and SRB assay. Liposomes were tested at the 1st, 7th, 14th, and 28th days of storage in differ temperatures