| Literature DB >> 35832583 |
Mengyue Huo1, Chunli Liu1, Hua Mei1, Yuheng Zhang1, Chunzhi Liu1, Dan Song1, Yayu Zhang1, Yanbo Zhang1, Chun Xin1.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oropharyngeal administration of colostrum (OAC) in preterm infants.Entities:
Keywords: colostrum; infant; meta-analysis; oropharyngeal administration; preterm infants
Year: 2022 PMID: 35832583 PMCID: PMC9271762 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.895375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.569
Figure 1Flow diagram of study selection.
General characteristics of included studies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Aggarwal et al. ( | 117/115 | 30 (28–31) | 30 (29–31) | 1,205 ± 297 | 1,198 ± 259 | 0.2 ml of maternal colostrum was administered through oropharynx every 3 h, until oral feeds were initiated | 0.2 mL of sterile water was applied as in colostrum group | a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, j, k, |
| OuYang et al. ( | 127/125 | 30.00 ± 1.83 | 29.65 ± 2.04 | 1,302.26 ± 209.81 | 1,328.72 ± 222.17 | 0.4 ml of maternal colostrum was administered through oropharynx every 3 h, lasted for a total of 10 days. | 0.4 mL of normal saline was applied as in colostrum group | a, b, c, d, e, f, h, i, j, k, l |
| Abd-Elgawad et al. ( | 100/100 | 28.9 ± 2.05 | 28.8 ± 2.26 | 1,050 ± 246 | 1,022 ± 249 | 0.2 ml of mother's colostrum was administered through oropharynx every 2–4 h, until reached complete enteral feeding. | Nothing was administered during the pre-feeding period. | a, b, c, d, e, f, g, l |
| Ferreira et al. ( | 47/66 | 28 (27–30) | 28 (26–31) | 1,048 (787–1,217) | 1,036 (801–1,206) | 0.2 ml of maternal colostrum was administered through oropharynx every 2 h, lasted for a total of 2 days. | 0.2 mL of sterile water was applied as in colostrum group | a, b, c, f, h, j, |
| Sharma et al. ( | 59/58 | 29.1 ± 1.8 | 29.2 ± 1.9 | 1,146 ± 58 | 1,158 ± 61 | 0.2 ml of maternal colostrum was administered through oropharynx every 2 h, lasted for a total of 3 days. | Routine care. | a, b, c, d, e, f, g, i, j, |
| Romano-Keeler et al. ( | 48/51 | 30 (27, 31) | 29 (28, 30) | 1,272 (988, 1,602) | 1,170 (905, 1,340) | 0.2 ml of maternal colostrum was administered through oropharynx every 6 h, lasted for a total of 5 days. | Routine care. | a, b, c, |
| Glass et al. ( | 17/13 | 28.4 ± 0.7 | 28.5 ± 0.8 | 1,132 ± 64 | 1,079 ± 59 | 0.2 ml of maternal colostrum was administered through oropharynx every 3 h, from 2 to 7 days. | 0.2 mL of sterile water was applied as in colostrum group | a, b, c, d, |
| Zhang et al. ( | 27/28 | 29.86 ± 2.02 | 30.46 ± 2.50 | 1,241 ± 275 | 1,248 ± 233 | 0.2 ml of colostrum was administered through oropharynx every 4 h, lasted for a total of 3 days. | 0.2 mL of sterile water was applied as in colostrum group | a, b, c, d, |
| Sohn et al. ( | 6/6 | 27 (25–30) | 27 (25–28) | 1,092 (490–1,350) | 1,015 (735–1,300) | 0.2 ml of colostrum was administered through oropharynx every 2 h, lasted for a total of 46 h. | Routine care. | a, b, c, f, g, |
| Lee et al. ( | 24/24 | 26 +5 (24+2-27+4) | 26+5 (24+3-27+1) | 830 (701–993) | 815 (610–1,003) | 0.2 ml of maternal colostrum was administered through oropharynx every 3 h, lasted for a total of 3 days. | 0.2 mL of sterile water was applied as in colostrum group. | a, b, c, f, g, h, j, |
| Nancy and Rodriguez ( | 9/6 | 25.97 ± 1.00 | 26.77 ± 0.97 | 776.11 ± 231.73 | 940.83 ± 181.34 | 0.2 ml of maternal colostrum was administered through oropharynx every 2 h, lasted for a total of 2 days. | 0.2 mL of sterile water was applied as in colostrum group | a, b, c, d, e, |
BW, birth weight; GA, gestation age; (a) incidence of NEC, (b) incidence of LOS, (c) death before discharge to home, (d) time to reach full enteral feeds, (e) duration of hospital stay, (f) incidence of BPD, (g) incidence of VAP, (h) incidence of (IVH) (grade ≥3), (i) incidence of PVL, (j) incidence of ROP, (k) incidence of PDA, (l) rate of weight gain (kg.d),
mean ± standard deviation (SD),
median (interquartile range).
Risk of bias in included studies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aggarwal et al. ( | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk |
| OuYang et al. ( | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk |
| Abd-Elgawad et al. ( | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
| Ferreira et al. ( | Unclear risk | Unclear risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
| Sharma et al. ( | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk |
| Romano-Keeler et al. ( | High risk | High risk | High risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk |
| Glass et al. ( | Low risk | Unclear risk | High risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk |
| Zhang et al. ( | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk |
| Sohn et al. ( | Unclear risk | Low risk | High risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk |
| Lee et al. ( | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
| Nancy and Rodriguez ( | Unclear risk | Unclear risk | Unclear risk | Unclear risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk |
Figure 2Summary of risk of bias.
Figure 3Summary of risk of bias.
Figure 4Forest plot of the incidence of NEC.
Figure 5Forest plot of the incidence of LOS.
Figure 6Forest plot of the death before discharge to home.
Figure 7Forest plot of time to reach full enteral feeds.
Figure 8Forest plot of duration of hospital.
Figure 9Forest plot of the incidence of BPD.
Figure 10Forest plot of the incidence of VAP.
Figure 11Forest plot of the incidence of IVH (grade ≥3).
Figure 12Forest plot of the incidence of PVL.
Figure 13Forest plot of the incidence of ROP.