Literature DB >> 35832571

A Retrospective Analysis of q12hr and q8hr Heparin for DVT/PE Prophylaxis in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting.

Adam Dashner1, Erin Siders PharmD1.   

Abstract

Purpose: There is little clinical evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of prophylactic subcutaneous heparin given every 8 hours and every 12 hours. We performed a retrospective analysis incorporating these dosing intervals in an inpatient rehabilitation setting.
Methods: Heparin usage data was collected and patient charts were analyzed for both therapeutic failure and bleeding events. A 2-tailed Fisher's exact test was performed for both outcomes, with a P-value of less than 0.05 being considered significant. Odds ratios were also calculated with P-values less than 0.05 being considered significant. Study Population: A Cerner report was run to identify patients ordered prophylactic heparin in an inpatient rehabilitation setting from April 7, 2020, to October 27, 2021. One hundred patients receiving heparin every 8 hours and every 12 hours were randomly selected for chart review. These study groups were further stratified by Padua risk scores.
Results: In both groups, 4 (4.0%) patients were identified as having a documented bleeding event and 2 (2.0%) patients from each group were identified as having a therapy failure.
Conclusion: For both endpoints, no significant differences in bleeding rates or therapy failure rates were detected in any of the population stratifications.
© The Author(s) 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anticoagulation; cardiology; clinical practice; drug safety; prophylaxis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35832571      PMCID: PMC9272488          DOI: 10.1177/87551225221094171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Technol        ISSN: 1549-4810


  5 in total

1.  Venous thromboembolism: a public health concern.

Authors:  Michele G Beckman; W Craig Hooper; Sara E Critchley; Thomas L Ortel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Current concepts: the use of heparin.

Authors:  D Deykin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1969-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score.

Authors:  S Barbar; F Noventa; V Rossetto; A Ferrari; B Brandolin; M Perlati; E De Bon; D Tormene; A Pagnan; P Prandoni
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 4.  Venous thromboembolic events in the rehabilitation setting.

Authors:  Brian M Kelly; Brian M Yoder; Chi-Tsai Tang; Thomas W Wakefield
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Twice vs three times daily heparin dosing for thromboembolism prophylaxis in the general medical population: A metaanalysis.

Authors:  Christopher S King; Aaron B Holley; Jeffrey L Jackson; Andrew F Shorr; Lisa K Moores
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 9.410

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.