| Literature DB >> 35832512 |
I-Ling Hung1,2, Chia-Jung Chung1, Wen-Long Hu1,3,4, Yen-Nung Liao1, Chung-Y Hsu5, Jen-Huai Chiang6,7, Yu-Chiang Hung1.
Abstract
Background: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) related to cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality and an important issue of public health worldwide. The cost of long-term healthcare for IHD patients may result in a huge financial burden.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35832512 PMCID: PMC9273382 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5596829
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Figure 1Flowchart of the recruitment of subjects treated with Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) from the 1 million random samples of the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database (LHID) in Taiwan.
Characteristics of ischemic heart disease patients according to use or nonuse of Chinese herbal medicine.
| Variable | Ischemic heart disease patients |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHM users | |||||
| No ( | Yes ( | ||||
|
| % |
| % | ||
| CHM for IHD | — | 376 | |||
| Sex | 0.99 | ||||
| Female | 8024 | 39.7 | 8024 | 39.7 | |
| Male | 12168 | 60.3 | 12168 | 60.3 | |
|
| |||||
| Age group | 0.99 | ||||
| 20–39 | 878 | 4.35 | 878 | 4.35 | |
| 40–64 | 9287 | 46.0 | 9287 | 46.0 | |
| More than 65 | 10027 | 49.7 | 10027 | 49.7 | |
| Mean ± SD (years) | 63.5 (13.2) | 63.4 (13.1) | 0.49a | ||
|
| |||||
| Baseline comorbidity | |||||
| Hyperlipidemia | 6275 | 31.1 | 6912 | 34.2 | <0.001 |
| Hypertension | 12424 | 61.53 | 10496 | 51.98 | <0.001 |
| DM | 4217 | 20.9 | 2934 | 14.5 | <0.001 |
| Stroke | 2370 | 11.7 | 1181 | 5.85 | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
| Charlson comorbidity index | <0.001 | ||||
| 0 | 12921 | 64.0 | 15311 | 75.8 | |
| 1 | 3561 | 17.6 | 3238 | 16.0 | |
| 2 | 1580 | 7.82 | 881 | 4.36 | |
| 3+ | 2130 | 10.6 | 762 | 3.77 | |
|
| |||||
| Mortality | 2745 | 13.6 | 1494 | 7.40 | <0.001 |
| Follow-up time median (IQR), years | 6.00 | (1.25, 6.00) | 8.12 | (2.77, 8.21) | <0.001§ |
IHD: ischemic heart disease; CHM: Chinese herbal medicine; DM: diabetes mellitus; SD: standard deviation. Chi-square test; at-test. IQR: interquartile range. §Wilcoxon's rank-sum test.
Clinical visits for outpatient care, length of hospital stay, and medical costs for CHM and non-CHM users within 1 and 5 years after initial IHD diagnosis.
| Cost | Non-CHM users | CHM users |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean (IQR) |
| Mean (IQR) | ||
| 1 year | |||||
|
| |||||
| Outpatients care visits | 19980 | 24 (15–38) | 20186 | 29 (18–43) | <0.0001 |
| Hospital length of stay (days) | 8778 | 10 (4–29) | 5925 | 6 (3–13) | <0.0001 |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| Outpatients care, NTD | 19980 | 25708 (13150–46629) | 20186 | 25873 (14046–44315) | 0.48 |
| Hospitalization, NTD | 8778 | 79900 (27541–206442) | 5925 | 41225 (20837–125302) | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
| 5 years | |||||
|
| |||||
| Outpatients care visits | 20001 | 94 (51–150) | 20191 | 133 (86–199) | <0.0001 |
| Hospital length of stay (days) | 13230 | 17 (6–52) | 11648 | 11 (4–27) | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| Outpatients care (NTD) | 20001 | 60367 (23708–128334) | 20191 | 123496 (70499–204492) | <0.0001 |
| Hospitalization (NTD) | 13230 | 107436 (35341–278464) | 11648 | 82732 (30007–212197) | <0.001 |
IHD: ischemic heart disease; CHM: Chinese herbal medicine; NTD: new Taiwan dollar; IQR: interquartile range.
Top ten single herbs and formulas prescribed by traditional Chinese medicine physicians to treat patients with ischemic heart disease.
| Herbal formula | Frequency | Number of person-days | Average daily dose (g) | Average duration for prescription (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Danshen | 678 | 7730 | 1.4 | 12.2 |
| Huang qi | 264 | 2610 | 2.0 | 9.9 |
| Niu xi | 144 | 2483 | 1.3 | 17.2 |
| Da huang | 137 | 1435 | 0.4 | 10.5 |
| Fu zi | 137 | 1302 | 1.1 | 9.5 |
| San qi | 134 | 1061 | 2.3 | 7.9 |
| Ji xue teng | 111 | 2123 | 1.4 | 19.1 |
| Hong hua | 108 | 1734 | 1.2 | 8.4 |
| Xu duan | 107 | 1897 | 1.1 | 8.9 |
| Ze xie | 96 | 751 | 1.1 | 7.8 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Zhi-Gan-Cao-Tang | 459 | 4861 | 4.5 | 10.6 |
| Xue-fu-Zhu-Yu-Tang | 338 | 3332 | 5.5 | 9.9 |
| Tian-Wang-Bu-Xin-Dan | 202 | 2546 | 4.60 | 12.6 |
| Sheng-Mai-San | 178 | 2404 | 4.40 | 13.5 |
| Yang-Xin-Tang | 137 | 955 | 8.9 | 7.0 |
| Jia-Wei-Xiao-Yao-San | 92 | 1333 | 3.9 | 14.5 |
| Ji-Sehng-Shen-Qi-Wan | 90 | 1511 | 4.70 | 16.8 |
| Sheng-Mai-Yin | 87 | 833 | 4.0 | 9.6 |
| Zhen-Wu-Tang | 84 | 857 | 8.60 | 10.2 |
| Ma-Zi-Ren-Wan | 75 | 1425 | 1.8 | 19.0 |
CHM: Chinese herbal medicine.
Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of mortality risk associated with the most-used herbal products for the treatment of ischemic heart disease: a comparison of Chinese herbal medicine users and nonusers.
| Prescription |
| Frequency of mortality | Hazard ratio (95% CI) compared with non-CHM group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude | Adjusted† | |||
| Non-CHM group | 20192 | 2745 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| CHM group | 20192 | 1494 | 0.42 (0.39, 0.45) | 0.45 (0.42, 0.48) |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Danshen | 142 | 8 | 0.32 (0.16, 0.64) | 0.28 (0.14, 0.56) |
| Huang qi | 40 | 4 | 0.55 (0.21, 1.46) | 0.51 (0.19, 1.36) |
| Niu xi | 21 | 3 | 0.80 (0.26, 2.49) | 0.79 (0.25, 2.45) |
| Da huang | 18 | 0 | ||
| Fu zi | 15 | 1 | 0.38 (0.05, 2.72) | 0.33 (0.05, 2.32) |
| San qi | 22 | 1 | 0.26 (0.04, 1.79) | 0.30 (0.04, 2.14) |
| Ji xue teng | 17 | 3 | 1.02 (0.33, 3.16) | 0.83 (0.27, 2.56) |
| Hong hua | 22 | 5 | 1.26 (0.53, 3.03) | 1.05 (0.44, 2.52) |
| Xu duan | 12 | 2 | 0.93 (0.23, 3.72) | 0.83 (0.21, 3.31) |
| Ze xie | 13 | 0 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Zhi-Gan-Cao-Tang | 107 | 9 | 0.51 (0.27, 0.98) | 0.51 (0.26, 0.98) |
| Xue-fu-Zhu-Yu-Tang | 95 | 4 | 0.24 (0.09, 0.63) | 0.23 (0.09, 0.62) |
| Tian-Wang-Bu-Xin-Dan | 54 | 3 | 0.31 (0.10, 0.96) | 0.29 (0.09, 0.90) |
| Sheng-Mai-San | 40 | 2 | 0.27 (0.07, 1.06) | 0.26 (0.07, 1.03) |
| Yang-Xin-Tang | 24 | 2 | 0.47 (0.12, 1.86) | 0.39 (0.10, 1.56) |
| Jia-Wei-Xiao-Yao-San | 37 | 2 | 0.31 (0.08, 1.24) | 0.52 (0.13, 2.06) |
| Ji-Sehng-Shen-Qi-Wan | 25 | 2 | 0.45 (0.11, 1.81) | 0.28 (0.07, 1.13) |
| Sheng-Mai-Yin | 33 | 2 | 0.39 (0.10, 1.57) | 0.40 (0.10, 1.62) |
| Zhen-Wu-Tang | 22 | 2 | 056 (0.14, 2.23) | 0.51 (0.13, 2.03) |
| Ma-Zi-Ren-Wan | 19 | 1 | 0.31 (0.04, 2.15) | 0.25 (0.04, 1.80) |
Crude HR represented relative hazard ratio; adjusted HR† represented adjusted hazard ratio: mutually adjusted for age, gender, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, stroke, and Charlson comorbidity index in Cox proportional hazards regression. CHM: Chinese herbal medicine; CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio. P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001.
HRs of mortality in the CHM user compared with those in the non-CHM user by Cox proportional hazard models with time-dependent exposure covariates.
| CHM | Crude HR (95% CI) | Adjusted HR† (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| No | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| Yes | 0.07 (0.05, 0.10) | 0.08 (0.06, 0.11) |
CHM: Chinese herbal medicine; CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio. P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001.
Incidence rates, hazard ratio, and confidence intervals of mortality for with and without CHM used anomaly patients in the stratification by gender, age, baseline comorbidity, and Charlson comorbidity index.
| Variables | Ischemic heart disease patients | Crude HR | Adjusted HR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-CHM user ( | CHM user ( | |||||||
| Event | Person-years | IR† | Event | Person-years | IR† | (95% CI) | (95% CI)‡ | |
| Sex | ||||||||
| Female | 983 | 51471 | 19.1 | 513 | 66613 | 7.70 | 0.40 (0.36, 0.44) | 0.46 (0.41, 0.51) |
| Male | 1762 | 77352 | 22.8 | 981 | 98565 | 9.95 | 0.43 (0.40, 0.47) | 0.45 (0.41, 0.48) |
|
| ||||||||
| Age | ||||||||
| 18–39 | 31 | 6460 | 4.80 | 11 | 7248 | 1.52 | 0.32 (0.16, 0.63) | 0.41 (0.21, 0.83) |
| 40–64 | 634 | 66699 | 9.51 | 191 | 76927 | 2.48 | 0.26 (0.22, 0.31) | 0.32 (0.27, 0.37) |
| More than 65 | 2080 | 55665 | 37.4 | 1292 | 81004 | 16.0 | 0.42 (0.39, 0.45) | 0.48 (0.45, 0.51) |
|
| ||||||||
| Baseline comorbidity | ||||||||
| No | 1568 | 1077048 | 14.7 | 1145 | 144550 | 7.92 | 0.53 (0.49, 0.57) | 0.47 (0.43, 0.51) |
| Yes | 1177 | 21776 | 54.1 | 349 | 20629 | 16.9 | 0.32 (0.28, 0.36) | 0.31 (0.27, 0.34) |
|
| ||||||||
| Charlson comorbidity index | ||||||||
| 0 | 994 | 93509 | 10.6 | 848 | 128473 | 6.60 | 0.60 (0.55, 0.66) | 0.54 (0.49, 0.59) |
| 1 | 686 | 20412 | 33.6 | 380 | 25505 | 14.9 | 0.43 (0.38, 0.48) | 0.41 (0.36, 0.47) |
| 2 | 410 | 7245 | 56.6 | 133 | 6323 | 21.0 | 0.37 (0.30, 0.45) | 0.37 (0.30, 0.45) |
| 3+ | 655 | 7657 | 85.5 | 133 | 4877 | 27.3 | 0.33 (0.28, 0.40) | 0.32 (0.26, 0.38) |
IR, incidence rates, per 1,000 person-years; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval †adjusted for CHM used, age, gender, baseline comorbidity, and Charlson comorbidity index in Cox proportional hazards regression P < 0.05; P < 0.01; P < 0.001.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier curve of the 10-year survival rate among Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) users and non-CHM users with ischemic heart disease (10-year survival: non-CHM users, 0.82; CHM users, 0.91).
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier (a) and adjusted HR (b) landmark curves between 0 and 5 years and 5 and 12 years according to ischemic heart disease. CHM: Chinese herbal medicine.