| Literature DB >> 35832234 |
Nasrullah Khan1, Rafi Ullah1, Saud S Alamri2, Yasmeen A Alwasel2, Abdulrahman Al-Hashimi2, Mostafa A Abdel-Maksoud2, Mohammad K Okla2, Hamada AbdElgawad3.
Abstract
The elevation is an important gradient across which the environmental variables and plant traits vary and is considered as a barrier to the recent global problem of plant invasion. However, certain invasive plants show plasticity traits to adapt and cope with the changes across the elevation. Silybum marianum (S. marianum) is one such invasive species widely spread in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Therefore, this study investigates the traits plasticity and invasive behaviors of this plant species across the elevation gradient. Plant functional traits (PFTs) and environmental variables were recorded in forty different low, middle, and high elevation sites. The plant shows a decrease in plant functional traits, i.e., above-ground plant height/plant, leaf length/leaf, leaf width/leaf, leaf dry weight/plant, vegetative dry weight/plant, and number of capitula/plant having the significance of p < 0.05. In contrast, the dry reproductive weight does not change significantly with elevation, while the root length increases across the elevation. The soil and environmental variables such as organic matter, lime percentage, and latitude significantly affected the PFTs. The importance value index of the species was also related to elevation and diversity indices, i.e., species richness, Shannon-Wiener diversity index, and evenness index, indicating that the invasion has strong effects on diversity. This study concludes that S. marianum has traits plasticity across the elevation and affects community diversity. Further investigation is required to understand the invasion and diversity parameters in a better way.Entities:
Keywords: Silybum marianum; diversity indices; elevation gradient; importance value index; plants functional traits
Year: 2022 PMID: 35832234 PMCID: PMC9271949 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.897678
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
FIGURE 1Sampling area map revealing sampling points selected for phytosociological and traits analysis (morphological and biomass).
FIGURE 2Cluster dendrogram separating 40 stands of Silybum marianum (S. marianum) across the invasion intensity.
Morphological and biomass traits variations represented as mean and SE with ANOVA output of Silybum marianum (S. marianum) along the elevation gradient in Pakistan.
| Trait | Group I | Group II | Group III | ||
| IVI | 100 ± 0 | 63 ± 7 | 33 ± 6 | 560 | 2.13E-28 |
| RL | 4.55 ± 0.10a | 3.86 ± 0.14a | 6.17 ± 0.16b | 5.27 | 0.0096 |
| RD | 2.31 ± 0.05a | 2.28 ± 0.06a | 3.14 ± 0.04b | 6.36 | 0.0042 |
| DWR/P | 3.1 ± 0.07a | 2.94 ± 0.08a | 5.48 ± 0.16b | 10.70 | 0.00021 |
| AGPH/P | 131.98 ± 0.85a | 112.39 ± 0.57b | 95.99 ± 0.59c | 52.92 | 1.4E-11 |
| SD | 5.22 ± 0.05a | 4.91 ± 0a | 4.36 ± 0.02b | 10.56 | 0.00023 |
| SDW/P | 32.49 ± 0.2a | 27.60 ± 0.14b | 23.49 ± 0.14c | 52.56 | 1.54E-11 |
| NL/P | 27.19 ± 0.10a | 26.48 ± 0.08b | 23.93 ± 0.09b | 24.76 | 1.49E-07 |
| LL/L | 35.19 ± 0.10a | 34.49 ± 0.08b | 31.93 ± 0.09b | 24.81 | 1.46E-07 |
| LW/L | 16.60 ± 0.05a | 16.24 ± 0.04b | 14.96 ± 0.04b | 24.81 | 1.46E-07 |
| LDW/P | 22.59 ± 0.05a | 22.24 ± 0.04b | 20.96 ± 0.04b | 24.81 | 1.46E-07 |
| NC/P | 22.97 ± 0.25a | 22.48 ± 0.11b | 19.19 ± 0.11b | 9.45 | 0.0005 |
| NS/P | 91.90 ± 1a | 89.91 ± 0.45b | 76.79 ± 0.48b | 11.07 | 0.00017 |
| CC/P | 79.98 ± 0.85a | 60.22 ± 0.57b | 43.14 ± 0.50c | 60.28 | 2.28E-12 |
| VDW/P | 58.19 ± 0.34a | 52.77 ± 0.26b | 49.94 ± 0.36b | 24.03 | 2.05E-07 |
| RDW/P | 2.72 ± 0.09a | 2.79 ± 0.01a | 2.76 ± 0.007a | 0.9946 | 0.3796 |
| TDW/P | 60.9 ± 0.24a | 55.54 ± 0.17b | 52.70 ± 0.26b | 24.0833 | 2.0E-07 |
IVI, Importance value index; RL, Root length, cm; RD, Root diameter, cm; DWR/P, Dry weight root/Plant, g; AGPH/P, Above ground plant height/Plant, cm; SD, Stem diameter, cm; SDW/P, Stem dry weight/Plant, g; NL/P, Number of leaves/Plant; LL/L, Leaf length/L, cm; LW/L, Leaf width/Leaf, cm; LDW/P, Leaf dry weight/Plant, g; NF/P, Number of Capitula/Plant; NS/P, Number of seeds/Plant; CC/P, Crown cover/Plant, cm; VDW/P, Total dry weight/Plant, g; RDW/P, Reproductive dry weight/Plant, g; TDW/P, Total dry weight/Plant, g. Different superscript indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
FIGURE 3Comparison of root dry weight/aboveground dry weight and vegetative dry weight/reproductive dry weight ratios among the three groups separated on an elevation basis. Different letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
FIGURE 4Linear regression model outputs of important morphological and biomass traits across the elevation gradients in Silybum marianum.
Soil and diversity parameters changes with S. marianum invasion along the elevation gradient in Pakistan.
| Variable | Group I | Group II | Group III | ||
| CL % | 29.97 ± 0.6 | 33.18 ± 0.69 | 35.17 ± 0.71 | 1.13 | 0.33 |
| SL % | 38.02 ± 0.68 | 32.81 ± 0.60 | 33.68 ± 0.66 | 1.33 | 0.28 |
| SN % | 32.07 ± 0.74 | 34.01 ± 0.73 | 31.15 ± 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.68 |
| pH | 6.21 ± 0.06a | 6.25 ± 0.60b | 5.55 ± 0.03b | 4.47 | 0.01 |
| OM% | 0.81 ± 0.03a | 0.58 ± 0.02a | 0.49 ± 0.005b | 4.46 | 0.01 |
| Lim % | 10.07 ± 0.16a | 10.13 ± 0.22a | 12.58 ± 0.23b | 3.41 | 0.04 |
| N % | 6.68 ± 1.17 | 4.699923077 | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 0.91 | 0.41 |
| EC | 33.15 ± 0.93 | 42.92 ± 0.82 | 40.5 ± 0.72 | 2.79 | 0.07 |
| K | 142.69 ± 2.85 | 133 ± 2.27 | 153.57 ± 2.96 | 1.07 | 0.35 |
| WP | 0.19 ± 0.003a | 0.19 ± 0.003a | 0.15 ± 0.002b | 3.91 | 0.02 |
| FC | 0.33 ± 0.003a | 0.33 ± 0.003a | 0.29 ± 0.002b | 4.64 | 0.01 |
| BD | 1.30 ± 0.008a | 1.32 ± 0.007a | 1.23 ± 0.005b | 3.53 | 0.04 |
| SP | 0.50 ± 0.003a | 0.51 ± 0.003a | 0.47 ± 0.002b | 3.63 | 0.03 |
| AW | 0.14 ± 0.001a | 0.14 ± 0.001a | 0.13 ± 0.0007b | 4.46 | 0.01 |
| S | 1 ± 0a | 6.15 ± 0.11b | 9.29 ± 0.13c | 130.4 | 1.11E-16 |
| H | 0a | 1.45 ± 0.02b | 1.99 ± 0.01c | 348.8 | 1.11E-16 |
| J | 0a | 0.81 ± 0.004b | 0.9 ± 0.003c | 1631 | 1.11E-16 |
Lat, Latitude; Long, Longitude; Elev, Elevation; AD, Aspect degree; CL%, Clay percentage; SL%, Silt percentage; SN%, Sand percentage; pH, Protenz Hydrogen; OM%, Organic matter percentage; Lim%, Lime percentage; N%, Nitrogen percentage; EC, Electrical conductivity; K, Potassium, mg/kg; WP, Wilting point; FC, Field capacity; BD, Bulk density; SP, Saturation point; S, Species richness; H, Shannon-wiener diversity index; J, Pielou evenness index. Different superscript indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Variation of spatial parameters represented as mean and SE along the elevation gradient in Pakistan.
| Variable | Group I | Group II | Group III | ||
| Lat. (°) | 34.62 ± 0.03a | 34.36 ± 0.02a | 34.82 ± 0.01b | 6.37 | 0.004 |
| Long. (°) | 71.90 ± 0.02 | 72.07 ± 0.02 | 72.04 ± 0.02 | 1.25 | 0.299 |
| Elev. | 340.15 ± 4.84a | 859.38 ± 13.75b | 1548.64 ± 35.37c | 50.81 | 0.000 |
| AD | 93.15 ± 3.18 | 95.54 ± 3.57 | 118.5 ± 3.25 | 1.35 | 0.27 |
| EI | 3.08 ± 0.3a | 9.38 ± 0.44a | 30.21 ± 0.62b | 62.17 | 1.47E-12 |
| CF | 50.41 ± 1.18a | 33.31 ± 0.61b | 18.43 ± 0.78c | 22.19 | 4.64E-07 |
| GP | 2.91 ± 0.24a | 15.38 ± 0.55b | 35.36 ± 0.78c | 57.52 | 4.42E-12 |
| TD | 75.41 ± 0.91a | 44.61 ± 0.53b | 24.28 ± 0.33c | 22.47 | 1.11E-16 |
Lat, Latitude, °; Long, Longitude, °; Elev, Elevation, m; AD, Aspect degree, °; E, Erosion intensity; C, Cultivated fields; G, Grazing pressure; TD, Traffic density. Different superscript indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Correlation and biplot scores extracted from redundancy analysis of the associated environmental variables operated on S. marianum plant functional traits (PFTs).
| Variable | Correlation | Biplot scores | ||||
| Axis 1 | Axis 2 | Axis 3 | Axis 1 | Axis 2 | Axis 3 | |
| 1 IVI | 0.849 | 0.073 | –0.336 | 2.558 | 0.094 | –0.28 |
| 2 Lat | –0.237 | –0.416 | 0.107 | –0.714 | –0.538 | 0.089 |
| 3 Long | –0.025 | –0.156 | 0.327 | –0.074 | –0.201 | 0.272 |
| 4 Elev | –0.794 | –0.16 | 0.244 | –2.393 | –0.207 | 0.203 |
| 5 AD | –0.209 | –0.267 | –0.115 | –0.628 | –0.345 | –0.096 |
| 6 CL% | –0.269 | 0.131 | 0.327 | –0.81 | 0.169 | 0.272 |
| 7 SL% | 0.052 | –0.2 | –0.412 | 0.157 | –0.259 | –0.343 |
| 8 SN% | 0.236 | 0.068 | 0.078 | 0.712 | 0.088 | 0.065 |
| 9 pH | 0.328 | –0.052 | –0.352 | 0.988 | –0.067 | –0.293 |
| 10 OM% | 0.14 | 0.356 | –0.608 | 0.421 | 0.461 | –0.506 |
| 11 Lim% | –0.466 | –0.054 | –0.031 | –1.403 | –0.07 | –0.025 |
| 12 N% | 0.265 | –0.012 | 0.045 | 0.8 | –0.015 | 0.037 |
| 13 EC | –0.064 | 0.066 | 0.236 | –0.193 | 0.086 | 0.196 |
| 14 K | –0.172 | –0.063 | 0.19 | –0.518 | –0.081 | 0.158 |
| 15 WP | 0.279 | –0.115 | –0.307 | 0.84 | –0.149 | –0.256 |
| 16 FC | 0.321 | –0.12 | –0.373 | 0.967 | –0.155 | –0.31 |
| 17 BD | 0.258 | –0.129 | –0.366 | 0.778 | –0.167 | –0.304 |
| 18 SP | 0.305 | –0.111 | –0.349 | 0.918 | –0.144 | –0.291 |
| 19 EC | 0.231 | 0.094 | 0.11 | 0.695 | 0.122 | 0.091 |
| 20 AW | 0.315 | –0.097 | –0.351 | 0.95 | –0.125 | –0.292 |
| 21 S | –0.818 | 0.096 | 0.34 | –2.464 | 0.125 | 0.283 |
| 22 H | –0.81 | 0.072 | 0.366 | –2.439 | 0.093 | 0.305 |
| 23 J | –0.726 | 0.104 | 0.411 | –2.187 | 0.134 | 0.342 |
| 24 EI | –0.735 | –0.092 | 0.285 | –2.215 | –0.119 | 0.237 |
| 25 CF | 0.607 | 0.337 | –0.453 | 1.83 | 0.435 | –0.377 |
| 26 GP | –0.737 | –0.019 | 0.318 | –2.221 | –0.025 | 0.265 |
| 27 TD | 0.758 | 0.082 | –0.502 | 2.282 | 0.107 | –0.418 |
Captions are the same as that of
FIGURE 5Redundancy analysis biplot showing the distribution pattern of sites and different morphological and biomass traits. St (Site number): The rest of the captions are the same as that mentioned in Tables 1–3.