Literature DB >> 35832121

Computational Modeling of Nasal Drug Delivery Using Different Intranasal Corticosteroid Sprays for the Treatment of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.

Elias Sundström1, Rehab Talat1, Ahmad R Sedaghat1, Sid Khosla1, Liran Oren1.   

Abstract

Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) is a common otolaryngologic condition associated with decreased quality of life. The first-line treatment of ETD is intranasal corticosteroid sprays (INCS). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to study particle deposition on the Eustachian tube (ET) using two commercial INCS (Flonase and Sensimist). Simulations also considered the effects of nostril side, insertion depth, insertion angle, cone spray angle, inhaling rates, wall impingement treatment, and fluid film. Flonase and Sensimist produced different particle size distributions and sizes. Sensimist droplets are smaller, less sensitive to asymmetry in nostrils anatomy and variation in insertion angle, and therefore can reach the posterior nasopharynx more readily. Flonase produces larger particles with greater inertia. Its particles deposition is more sensitive to intrasubject variation in nasal anatomy and insertion angles. The particle deposition on the ET was sensitive to the wall impingement model. The deposition on the ET was insignificant with adherence only <0.15% but increased up to 1-4% when including additional outcomes rebound and splash effects when droplets impact with the wall. The dose redistribution with the fluid film is significant but plays a secondary effect on the ET deposition. Flonase aligned parallel with the hard palate produced 4% deposition efficiency on the ET, but this decreased <0.14% at the higher insertion angle. INCS with larger droplet sizes with a small insertion angle may be more effective at targeting droplet deposition on the ET opening.
Copyright © 2022 by ASME.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational fluid dynamics; nasal droplet deposition; spray injection

Year:  2022        PMID: 35832121      PMCID: PMC8996241          DOI: 10.1115/1.4053907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eng Sci Med Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2572-7958


  12 in total

Review 1.  The assessment of topical nasal drug distribution.

Authors:  R Aggarwal; A Cardozo; J J Homer
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2004-06

2.  Characterization of deposition from nasal spray devices using a computational fluid dynamics model of the human nasal passages.

Authors:  Julia S Kimbell; Rebecca A Segal; Bahman Asgharian; Brian A Wong; Jeffry D Schroeter; Jeremy P Southall; Colin J Dickens; Geoff Brace; Frederick J Miller
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2007

3.  Prevalence of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction in Adults in the United States.

Authors:  Alan Shan; Bryan K Ward; Adele M Goman; Joshua F Betz; Nicholas S Reed; Dennis S Poe; Carrie L Nieman
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  In Vitro Measurement of Regional Nasal Drug Delivery with Flonase,® Flonase® Sensimist,™ and MAD Nasal™ in Anatomically Correct Nasal Airway Replicas of Pediatric and Adult Human Subjects.

Authors:  Sana Hosseini; Xiangyin Wei; John V Wilkins; Christian P Fergusson; Reza Mohammadi; Gregory Vorona; Laleh Golshahi
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.849

5.  Effects of velopharyngeal openings on flow characteristics of nasal emission.

Authors:  Elias Sundström; Suzanne Boyce; Liran Oren
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-01-10

6.  Pharyngeal flow simulations during sibilant sound in a patient-specific model with velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Authors:  Elias Sundström; Liran Oren
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sound production mechanisms of audible nasal emission during the sibilant /s/.

Authors:  Elias Sundström; Liran Oren
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Computational modeling and validation of human nasal airflow under various breathing conditions.

Authors:  Chengyu Li; Jianbo Jiang; Haibo Dong; Kai Zhao
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Liquid Film Translocation Significantly Enhances Nasal Spray Delivery to Olfactory Region: A Numerical Simulation Study.

Authors:  Xiuhua April Si; Muhammad Sami; Jinxiang Xi
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 6.321

10.  Nasal sprayed particle deposition in a human nasal cavity under different inhalation conditions.

Authors:  Hadrien Calmet; Kiao Inthavong; Beatriz Eguzkitza; Oriol Lehmkuhl; Guillaume Houzeaux; Mariano Vázquez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.