| Literature DB >> 35832051 |
Feng Zhang1,2, Xiaojian Yin1,2,3, Yuan Liu1,2, Ming Li1,2, Xiaoying Gui4, Cunjian Bi1,2.
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the association between sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption and executive function (EF) among Chinese Tibetan adolescents. Method: Using three stages by stratified cluster sampling, 1,427 Chinese Tibetan adolescents were recruited from Tibet, China. SSB consumption status was obtained by questionnaires and the three core EFs (inhibition, working memory, and cognitive flexibility) were tested by a modified Eriksen flanker task, N-back shift, and a more-odd shifting task. One-way ANOVA or Chi-square test was used to compare SSB consumption in different categories. Taking the SSB consumption 0 time/week group as the reference, general linear regression (for continuous variable) or Logical regression (classified variable) in three Models was conducted to analyze the relationship between SSB consumption and EF for Chinese Tibetan children and adolescents. Result: After adjustment of all the covariant in Model 2, all the EF indexes were higher in Chinese Tibetan adolescents with SSB consumption ≥2 times/week than that with SSB consumption of 0 times/week by 21.33 ms (95%CI: 6.72, 35.93), 8.21 ms (95%CI: 7.06, 9.35), 90.46 ms (95%CI: 28.69, 152.23), 147.61 ms (95%CI: 81.42, 213.80), 116.18 ms (95%CI: 74.48, 157.87), 112.41 ms (95%CI: 71.30, 153.52) for incongruent RT, RT difference in incongruent and congruent, 1-back RT, 2-back RT, Heterogeneous RT, RT difference in Heterogeneous and Homogeneous respectively. Conclusions: The results suggested that SSB consumption was associated with poorer EF in Chinese Tibetan adolescents. SSB consumption should be controlled for healthy brain development of Chinese Tibetan adolescents.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese Tibetan adolescents; cognitive flexibility; inhibition; sugar-sweetened beverages; working memory
Year: 2022 PMID: 35832051 PMCID: PMC9271939 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.939256
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Map of the three cities in Tibet of China.
Figure 2Flowchart of participant inclusion for Chinese Tibetan adolescents.
The SSB consumption status of Chinese Tibetan adolescents in Tibet, China.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| 1,231 | 188 (15.27) | 634 (51.50) | 409 (33.23) | 363.58 | <0.001 |
| Age | 15.77 ± 1.68 | 15.95 ± 1.81 | 15.93 ± 1.65 | 15.44 ± 1.61 | 12.13 | <0.001 |
|
| ||||||
| Boys | 585 (47.5) | 102 (54.3) | 262 (41.3) | 221 (54.0) | 20.14 | <0.001 |
| Girls | 646 (52.5) | 86 (45.7) | 372 (58.7) | 188 (46.0) | ||
|
| ||||||
| 0 | 198 (16.1) | 29 (15.4) | 97 (15.3) | 72 (17.6) | 1.05 | 0.59 |
| ≥1 | 1,033 (83.9) | 159 (84.6) | 537 (84.7) | 337 (82.4) | ||
|
| ||||||
| Elementary school and below | 683 (63.2) | 95 (58.3) | 366 (64.7) | 222 (63.2) | 13.16 | 0.01 |
| Middle school | 268 (24.8) | 36 (22.1) | 135 (23.9) | 97 (27.6) | ||
| College and above | 129 (11.9) | 32 (19.6) | 65 (11.5) | 32 (9.1) | ||
|
| ||||||
| Elementary school and below | 775 (72.2) | 93 (57.8) | 432 (75.9) | 250 (72.9) | 38.95 | <0.001 |
| Middle school | 164 (15.3) | 25 (15.5) | 78 (13.7) | 61 (17.8) | ||
| College and above | 134 (12.5) | 43 (26.7) | 59 (10.4) | 32 (9.3) | ||
|
| ||||||
| ≤ 1 time/week | 35 (2.8) | 9 (4.8) | 12 (1.9) | 14 (3.4) | 13.85 | 0.01 |
| 2–4 times/week | 67 (5.4) | 9 (4.8) | 25 (3.9) | 33 (8.1) | ||
| ≥5 times/week | 1,129 (91.7) | 170 (90.4) | 597 (94.2) | 362 (88.5) | ||
|
| ||||||
| ≤ 1 time/week | 356 (28.9) | 54 (28.7) | 192 (30.3) | 110 (26.9) | 4.58 | 0.33 |
| 2–4 times/week | 562 (45.7) | 79 (42.0) | 281 (44.3) | 202 (49.4) | ||
| ≥5 times/week | 313 (25.4) | 55 (29.3) | 161 (25.4) | 97 (23.7) | ||
|
| ||||||
| ≤ 1 time/week | 349 (28.4) | 68 (36.2) | 179 (28.2) | 102 (24.9) | 9.21 | 0.06 |
| 2–4 times/week | 619 (50.3) | 79 (42.0) | 321 (50.6) | 219 (53.5) | ||
| ≥5 times/week | 263 (21.4) | 41 (21.8) | 134 (21.1) | 88 (21.5) | ||
| BMI | 20.49 ± 2.37 | 19.74 ± 1.79 | 20.4 ± 2.46 | 20.98 ± 2.37 | 19.31 | <0.001 |
| WC | 68.56 ± 7.22 | 67.38 ± 8.00 | 67.97 ± 6.90 | 70.01 ± 7.12 | 13.06 | <0.001 |
| MVPA | 41.81 ± 23.48 | 60.21 ± 18.45 | 40.25 ± 23.26 | 35.76 ± 21.69 | 82.26 | <0.001 |
| VO2max | 37.19 ± 5.58 | 38.96 ± 5.48 | 36.85 ± 5.52 | 36.90 ± 5.58 | 11.35 | <0.001 |
Descriptive statistics are presented as (mean ± standard deviation) and number (percentage) for continuous and categorical.
SSB, sugar-sweetened beverages; BMI, body mass index; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; VO.
The status of executive function for Chinese Tibetan adolescents with different SSB consumption in Tibet of China.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Congruent | 0 time/week | 188 | 745.65 | 94.22 | 20.44 | <0.001 |
| 1 time/week | 634 | 772.52 | 76.96 | |||
| ≥2 times/week | 409 | 791.86 | 86.64 | |||
| Incongruent | 0 time/week | 188 | 760.80 | 93.67 | 29.32 | <0.001 |
| 1 time/week | 634 | 792.35 | 76.12 | |||
| ≥2 times/week | 409 | 815.67 | 86.43 | |||
| Difference incongruent and congruent | 0 time/week | 188 | 15.15 | 3.28 | 174.78 | <0.001 |
| 1 time/week | 634 | 19.84 | 6.31 | |||
| ≥2 times/week | 409 | 23.81 | 4.53 | |||
|
| ||||||
| 1-back | 0 time/week | 188 | 927.03 | 351.95 | 20.72 | <0.001 |
| 1 time/week | 634 | 938.24 | 311.75 | |||
| ≥2 times/week | 409 | 1,056.71 | 290.49 | |||
| 2-back | 0 time/week | 188 | 960.10 | 360.41 | 43.87 | <0.001 |
| 1 time/week | 634 | 1,075.45 | 380.06 | |||
| ≥2 times/week | 409 | 1,226.01 | 275.48 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Heterogeneous | 0 time/week | 188 | 1,017.51 | 209.75 | 67.25 | <0.001 |
| 1 time/week | 634 | 1,100.70 | 253.78 | |||
| ≥2 times/week | 409 | 1,236.58 | 221.42 | |||
| Homogeneous | 0 time/week | 188 | 737.48 | 133.50 | 9.77 | <0.001 |
| 1 time/week | 634 | 741.79 | 114.80 | |||
| ≥2 times/week | 409 | 771.56 | 107.75 | |||
| Difference in heterogeneous and homogeneous | 0 time/week | 188 | 280.04 | 179.29 | 60.23 | <0.001 |
| 1 time/week | 634 | 358.90 | 228.52 | |||
| ≥2 times/week | 409 | 465.02 | 178.77 | |||
Descriptive statistics are presented as (mean ± SD).
SSB, sugar-sweetened beverages; N, number of the sample; SD, standard deviation.
The multiple linear regression of executive function for Chinese Tibetan adolescents with different SSB consumption (n = 1,231).
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| 0 time/week | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) |
| 1 time/week | 26.87 (13.33, 40.40)a | 7.56 (−5.67, 20.79) | 6.59 (−6.64, 19.82) |
| ≥2 times/week | 46.21 (31.85, 60.57)a | 14.16 (−0.58, 28.89) | 13.12 (−1.59, 27.83) |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||
| 0 time/week | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) |
| 1 time/week | 31.55 (18.11, 44.99)a | 12.15 (−0.98, 25.28) | 11.21 (−1.92, 24.34) |
| ≥2 times/week | 54.87 (40.61, 69.13)a | 22.32 (7.69, 36.95)a | 21.33 (6.72, 35.93)a |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||
| 0 time/week | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) |
| 1 time/week | 4.69 (3.81, 5.56)a | 4.60 (3.57, 5.62)a | 4.62 (3.59, 5.65)a |
| ≥2 times/week | 8.66 (7.73, 9.59)a | 8.16 (7.02, 9.30)a | 8.21 (7.06, 9.35)a |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| 0 time/week | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) |
| 1 time/week | 11.20 (−39.54, 61.95) | −14.32 (−69.75, 41.12) | −14.28 (−69.81, 41.25) |
| ≥2 times/week | 129.67 (75.83, 183.51)a | 89.91 (28.15, 151.67)a | 90.46 (28.69, 152.23)a |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||
| 0 time/week | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) |
| 1 time/week | 115.35 (59.04, 171.66)a | 53.24 (−5.95, 112.43) | 53.48 (−6.02, 112.99) |
| ≥2 times/week | 265.92 (206.17, 325.66)a | 147.40 (81.46, 213.34)a | 147.61 (81.42, 213.80)a |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| 0 time/week | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) |
| 1 time/week | 83.18 (44.56, 121.80)a | 14.69 (−22.70, 52.07) | 14.54 (−22.94, 52.03) |
| ≥2 times/week | 219.06 (178.09, 260.04)a | 116.93 (75.28, 158.57)a | 116.18 (74.48, 157.87)a |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||
| 0 time/week | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) |
| 1 time/week | 4.32 (−14.52, 23.15) | −11.77 (−30.82, 7.29) | −11.71 (−30.76, 7.35) |
| ≥2 times/week | 34.09 (14.10, 54.07)a | 3.57 (−17.66, 24.79) | 3.76 (−17.43, 24.95) |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||
| 0 time/week | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) | 0 (Reference) |
| 1 time/week | 78.87 (45.30, 112.43) | 26.46 (−10.33, 63.25) | 26.25 (−10.71, 63.21) |
| ≥2 times/week | 184.98 (149.37, 220.59) | 113.36 (72.37, 154.34)a | 112.41 (71.30, 153.52)a |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Crude Model: without adjustment; Model 1: adjusting age, sex, siblings, parental education, BMI, WC, MVPA, and VO
.
The logistic regression of executive function for Chinese Tibetan adolescents with different SSB consumption (n = 1,231).
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
| 0 time/week | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| 1 time/week | 4.20 (2.16, 8.18)a | 3.12 (1.51, 6.48)a | 3.10 (1.49, 6.44)a |
| ≥2 times/week | 7.22 (3.69, 14.13)a | 5.93 (2.79, 12.61)a | 5.91 (2.78, 12.59)a |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| 0 time/week | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| 1 time/week | 0.82 (0.54, 1.24) | 0.68 (0.41, 1.13) | 0.71 (0.42, 1.19) |
| ≥2 times/week | 1.45 (0.95, 2.21) | 1.29 (0.75, 2.22) | 1.37 (0.79, 2.36) |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||
| 0 time/week | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| 1 time/week | 2.91 (1.68, 5.02)a | 2.67 (1.30, 5.47)a | 2.75 (1.34, 5.65)b |
| ≥2 times/week | 3.30 (1.88, 5.78)a | 2.89 (1.36, 6.14)a | 2.98 (1.40, 6.34)a |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||
| 0 time/week | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| 1 time/week | 4.31 (2.06, 9.03)a | 2.22 (0.96, 5.16) | 2.32 (0.99, 5.46) |
| ≥2 times/week | 6.90 (3.28, 14.53)a | 2.67 (1.12, 6.36)b | 2.80 (1.16, 6.74)b |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Crude Model: without adjustment; Model 1: adjusting age, sex, siblings, parental education, BMI, WC, MVPA, and VO
.