| Literature DB >> 35831983 |
Shiying Wu1, Krishan Kumar Sharma2, Chi Long Ho1,3,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Capillary hemangiomas are often seen on the skin of young individuals and are rarely found in the spine. These vascular lesions can arise from any spinal compartment, although they are more commonly found in the intradural extramedullary (IDEM) than the epidural location. We present a unique case of a woman with a histologically proven spinal epidural capillary hemangioma (SECH). The imaging and histopathological characteristics, as well as the treatment strategy of this vascular lesion, are highlighted along with a comprehensive review of the literature. CASE REPORT A 38-year-old woman presented with progressively worsening low back pain that radiated to both legs. Neurological examination revealed a weakness of the left leg without sensory loss. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated an epidural tumor at L1-L2 level, making an obtuse angle with the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on sagittal T2-weighted images. The patient underwent a complete tumor resection without complications or recurrence. The histology revealed a capillary hemangioma. CONCLUSIONS SECH is exceedingly rare, with only 22 cases in the reported literature. Females are more commonly affected than males, and the thoracic spine is more commonly involved than the lumbar spine. SECH often mimics other epidural and IDEM lesions, leading to misdiagnosis. MRI is useful to differentiate SECH from lesions in the various spinal compartments; additionally, MRI is essential for preoperative planning and patient surveillance. Preoperative embolization is an option given the high vascularity of SECH. Surgery is the mainstay treatment, with a good prognosis, in most cases without recurrence.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35831983 PMCID: PMC9295191 DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936181
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Case Rep ISSN: 1941-5923
Summary of all the reported cases of spinal epidural capillary hemangioma in the literature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gupta, 1996 [ | 50/M | BP, myelopathy, weakness LL | T8–10 | Post-contrast enhancement | TR | NR, GR |
| Badinand, 2003 [ | 40/F | Gait disturbance, LL pain, incontinence | T2–4 | T3–4 foraminal extension | TR | NR, GR |
| Kang, 2006 [ | 56/M | Radiating chest wall pain | T2–4 | Dumbbell-shaped | PR | NR, GR |
| Tekin, 2008 [ | 56/F | BP, radiates to R thigh, L4 hypoesthesia | L3–4 | Heterogeneous with flow voids | TR | NR, symptoms improved |
| Akhaddar, 2010 [ | 19/F | BP, progr gait disturbance | T5–6 | Homogeneously-enhanced, foraminal extension | TR | NR, GR |
| Hasan, 2011 [ | 57/M | BP, progr myelopathy, weakness LL | T10–12 | Foraminal extension | PR | NR, symptoms improved |
| Shilton, 2011 [ | 47/F | BP, thoracic myelopathy (post-traumatic) | T7–8 | Foraminal extension | TR | NR, symptoms improved |
| Vassal, 2011 [ | 59/F | BP, R intercostal neuralgia | T5–7 | Intrathoracic extension | TR | NR,GR |
| Seferi, 2014 [ | 58/M | BP, paraparesis, sensory disturbance | T2–4 | Foraminal extension | TR | NR, GR |
| Gencpinar, 2014 [ | 17/F | Weakness LL | T3–7 | Foraminal extension | TR | NR, GR |
| Garcia-Pallero, 2015 [ | 67/F | Dyspnea, pleural effusion | T4–5 | Heterogeneous paravertebral tumor with intrathoracic extension | TR | NR, GR |
| Egu, 2016 [ | 60/F | BP, S1 radiculopathy | L5-S1 | Homogeneous enhancing | TR | NR, symptoms improved |
| Kilic, 2017 [ | 40/M | BP, L LL pain (post-traumatic) | L1 | Vertebral body, pedicle and transverse process | TR | NR |
| Rajeev, 2017 [ | 50/M | Paraparesis LL | L1–2 | Enhancing mass, foraminal extension | TR | NR, symptoms improved |
| Brasil, 2018 [ | 69/F | BP | T9–10 | No extension | TR | NR |
| Xu, 2018 [ | 57/M | BP, LL weakness | T2–3 | Foraminal extension | TR | NR, symptoms improved |
| Cofano, 2019 [ | 52/F | BP | T6–9 | Foraminal extension | TR | NR |
| Sudir, 2019 [ | 63/M | BP, LL weakness (post-traumatic) | T6–8 | Vertebral body, pedicle and transverse process | TR | NR |
| Niznick, 2020 [ | 51/F | Sensory and gait disturbances | T5–6 | Foraminal extension | TR | NR |
| Rajpal, 2020 [ | 29/F | Flank pain | T7 | Foraminal and intrathoracic extension | TR | NR |
| Doi, 2021 [ | 47/M | BP, LL pain, sensory disturbance, incontinence | L2–4 | Also involves spinous process and laminae | PR | NR |
| Current case | 38/F | Progr BP, gait disturbance, LL weakness and paresthesia | L1–2 | Homogeneous enhancement | TR | NR, symptoms improved |
BP – backpain; GR – good recovery; F – female; L – left; LL – lower leg, M – male; NR – no recurrence or residual tumor; progr –progressive; PR – partial resection; R – right; TR – total resection.
Differentiating spinal epidural capillary hemangioma from other epidural and intradural extramedullary tumors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epidural | Metastases | Incidence ↑ with age (typically >40 years old) | Predilection for the posterior elements. | T1↓ T2↑↔ | Enhances | Predilection for the posterior elements, may have cortical destruction with associated soft tissue mass. Commonly seen in breast, lung, prostate, renal, gastrointestinal, and thyroid |
| Multiple myeloma (MM) | E. Ads M>F | Any vertebral body, typically sparing the pedicles (vs metastases/malignancy pedicles involved) [ | Osseous (T2↑ T1↓) Extraosseous T2↓ | Avid Homogeneous | Extraosseous lesions contiguous with bone, often larger and occur in a paraspinal or epidural location. MM can be associated with collapsed vertebral body, and cord compression | |
| Ewing sarcoma | Chd, Y. Ads | Thoraco-Lumbar | T2↑ T1↓ | Heterogeneous enhancement of tumor and affected vertebrae | CT scan: Lytic permeative destruction | |
| Primary vertebral lymphoma (commonly NHL type) | Ads (5th–7th decades), M>F (8: 1) | Lesions arise from epidural lymphoid tissue along the thoracic and lumbar spine | T2↑ | Homogeneous | Restricted diffusion with markedly low ADC | |
| Spinal epidural capillary hemangioma | Ads (4th–5th decades) M<F (9: 13) | Thoracic > lumbar spine (16: 6) | T2↑ T1↓ | Homogeneous | Foraminal extension in 50% of cases | |
| SFT/HPC | Ads (4–6 decades) M>F | Thoracic >cervical >lumbar | T1↔, T1↓ T2↑ | Intense homogeneous | ||
| IDEM | Meningioma | Ads, F>M (9: 1) | Thoracic > cervical | T2↔, T2↑ | Intense homogeneous | Broad-based dural attachment and CSF cleft sign. Commonly – solitary; multiple lesions in MEN type II |
| Schwannoma | Y. Ads M>F | Dorsal nerve root, neural foramen Thoracic >cervical | T2↑ | Homogeneous or inhomo-geneous | Cysts and necrosis. Commonly – solitary; multiple lesions in MEN type II | |
| Paraganglioma | Ads M>F | Conus, cauda equina | T2↔, T2↑ | Mildly inhomoge-neous “salt-and-pepper” appearance due to prominent flow voids | Hemosiderin from prior hemorrhage (T2↓ rim “cap sign”) detected on T2 and GRE sequences | |
| Myxopapillary ependymoma (13% of all spinal ependymomas) | Y. Ads, M>F | Conus medullaris, cauda equina | T2↑ at tumor margin (hemosiderin) | Typically homogeneous (except hemorrhage) | Hemorrhage detected on GRE sequences |
ADC – apparent diffusion coefficient; Adol – adolescent; Ads – adults; Chd – children; CT – computed tomography; E – elderly; F – females; GRE – T2*-weighted gradient-recorded echo; HPC – hemangiopericytoma; IDEM – intradural extramedullary; M – men; MEN – multiple endocrine neoplasia; MR – magnetic resonance; NHL – non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; SFT – solitary fibrous tumor; Y – young; symbols: ↑ – hyperintense; ↓ – hypointense; ↔ – isointense.