Nan Zheng1,2, Jun Zhang3,4. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Hebei Medical University, No. 361 Zhongshan East Road, Shijiazhuang, 050017, China. 2. Department of Cardiology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, No. 16 Xinhua Road, Yunhe Qu, Cangzhou City, 061000, China. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Hebei Medical University, No. 361 Zhongshan East Road, Shijiazhuang, 050017, China. dr_zhangj@sina.com. 4. Department of Cardiology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, No. 16 Xinhua Road, Yunhe Qu, Cangzhou City, 061000, China. dr_zhangj@sina.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF (R is renal dysfunction, and AF is atrial fibrillation type) and CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF (L is left atrial diameter, and AF is atrial fibrillation type) scores have been developed to estimate the risk of left atrial thrombus (LAT) and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, few external validations have been conducted to assess their accuracy. Thus, this study aimed to validate and compare the two modified scores for predicting LAT/SEC in patients with NVAF. METHODS: This study included 399 patients with NVAF who underwent transesophageal echocardiography. Risk factors related to LAT/SEC were identified through logistic regression analysis, and predictive value and diagnostic efficiency were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Approximately 9.8% (39/399) of the patients with NVAF had LAT/SEC. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that history of stroke/transient ischemic attack, congestive heart failure, non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, lack of anticoagulation therapy, enlarged left atrial diameter, enlarged left ventricular end diastolic diameter, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased left atrial appendage emptying velocity, and decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate were independent risk factors for LAT/SEC. The CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.839) and CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF (AUC = 0.829) scores showed larger predictive values than the CHA2DS2-VASc (AUC = 0.737) and CHADS2 (AUC = 0.736) scores. The AUC of the CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF score was similar to that of the CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF score (Z = 0.432; P = 0.666). CONCLUSION: This study validated that the CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF and CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF scores are useful prognostic scoring systems for predicting LAT/SEC in patients with NVAF.
PURPOSE: CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF (R is renal dysfunction, and AF is atrial fibrillation type) and CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF (L is left atrial diameter, and AF is atrial fibrillation type) scores have been developed to estimate the risk of left atrial thrombus (LAT) and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, few external validations have been conducted to assess their accuracy. Thus, this study aimed to validate and compare the two modified scores for predicting LAT/SEC in patients with NVAF. METHODS: This study included 399 patients with NVAF who underwent transesophageal echocardiography. Risk factors related to LAT/SEC were identified through logistic regression analysis, and predictive value and diagnostic efficiency were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Approximately 9.8% (39/399) of the patients with NVAF had LAT/SEC. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that history of stroke/transient ischemic attack, congestive heart failure, non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, lack of anticoagulation therapy, enlarged left atrial diameter, enlarged left ventricular end diastolic diameter, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased left atrial appendage emptying velocity, and decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate were independent risk factors for LAT/SEC. The CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.839) and CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF (AUC = 0.829) scores showed larger predictive values than the CHA2DS2-VASc (AUC = 0.737) and CHADS2 (AUC = 0.736) scores. The AUC of the CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF score was similar to that of the CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF score (Z = 0.432; P = 0.666). CONCLUSION: This study validated that the CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF and CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF scores are useful prognostic scoring systems for predicting LAT/SEC in patients with NVAF.
Authors: Agnieszka Kapłon-Cieślicka; Monika Budnik; Monika Gawałko; Michał Peller; Iwona Gorczyca; Anna Michalska; Aldona Babiarz; Aleksandra Bodys; Robert Uliński; Maciej Żochowski; Piotr Scisło; Janusz Kochanowski; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Grzegorz Opolski Journal: Heart Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Gerhard Hindricks; Tatjana Potpara; Nikolaos Dagres; Elena Arbelo; Jeroen J Bax; Carina Blomström-Lundqvist; Giuseppe Boriani; Manuel Castella; Gheorghe-Andrei Dan; Polychronis E Dilaveris; Laurent Fauchier; Gerasimos Filippatos; Jonathan M Kalman; Mark La Meir; Deirdre A Lane; Jean-Pierre Lebeau; Maddalena Lettino; Gregory Y H Lip; Fausto J Pinto; G Neil Thomas; Marco Valgimigli; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Bart P Van Putte; Caroline L Watkins Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Sebastian Feickert; Giuseppe D Ancona; Hüseyin Ince; Kristof Graf; Elias Kugel; Monica Murero; Erdal Safak Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2020-10-31
Authors: Asad Shabbir; Christian Fielder Camm; Andrew Elkington; Lindsey Tilling; James Stirrup; Antoni Chan; Sacha Bull Journal: Eur Heart J Case Rep Date: 2020-10-30