Literature DB >> 3583162

The use of footprint contact index II for classification of flat feet in a Nigerian population.

B C Didia, E T Omu, A A Obuoforibo.   

Abstract

The objective index as developed by Qaura, Deodhar, and Jit, in 1980 was used to estimate the incidence of flat foot (pes planus) in 990 school pupils (532 females and 458 males) between the ages of 5 and 14 years. The ratio of contact area to the total area of the middle of the footprint (contact index 1) (4/10), usually measured with a planimeter, is accepted as the true representative of the condition of arches. In this field study, contact index II (ratio of contact width to the total width of the foot) which is simple, reliable, and correlates with contact index I has been used to assess flat foot. The mean for the contact index and standard deviation have been calculated. Feet have been considered as normal up to 1 SD around the mean value of the index and values greater or lesser than this have been considered abnormal. Furthermore, mean +/- 1 SD to 2 SD has been considered as possible flat foot, whereas mean +/- 3 SD and above has been taken as definite flat foot. On the whole, bilateral flat foot is not common among children of school age in Port Harcourt (0.60%). It is, however, more common in females (0.75%) than males (0.44%). Unilateral flat foot (2.22%) is found to be more common than bilateral flat foot. Early introduction to the use of shoes may predispose to flat foot. We were not in a position to say if any of the subjects found with flat foot would have a painful foot.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3583162     DOI: 10.1177/107110078700700504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle        ISSN: 0198-0211


  4 in total

1.  Prevalence of congenital abnormalities in Turkish school children.

Authors:  S Yücesan; H Dindar; I Olcay; H Okur; S Kiliçaslan; Y Ergören; C Tüysüz; M Koca; B Civilo; I Sen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 2.  Paediatric flexible flat foot: how are we measuring it and are we getting it right? A systematic review.

Authors:  Helen A Banwell; Maisie E Paris; Shylie Mackintosh; Cylie M Williams
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  The typically developing paediatric foot: how flat should it be? A systematic review.

Authors:  Hayley Uden; Rolf Scharfbillig; Ryan Causby
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  How barefoot and conventional shoes affect the foot and gait characteristics in toddlers.

Authors:  Marta Gimunová; Kateřina Kolářová; Tomáš Vodička; Michal Bozděch; Martin Zvonař
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.