Quisette P Janssen1,2, Jacob L van Dam2, Laura R Prakash3, Deesje Doppenberg4, Christopher H Crane5, Casper H J van Eijck2, Susannah G Ellsworth6, William R Jarnagin1, Eileen M O'Reilly7, Alessandro Paniccia8, Marsha Reyngold5, Marc G Besselink4, Matthew H G Katz3, Ching-Wei D Tzeng3, Amer H Zureikat8, Bas Groot Koerkamp2, Alice C Wei1. 1. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; 2. Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; 3. Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 4. Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 7. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and 8. Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The value of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, with or without dose modifications [(m)FOLFIRINOX], for patients with borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is uncertain. METHODS: We conducted an international retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients with BR PDAC who received (m)FOLFIRINOX as initial treatment (2012-2019) from the Trans-Atlantic Pancreatic Surgery Consortium. Because the decision to administer RT is made after chemotherapy, patients with metastases or deterioration after (m)FOLFIRINOX or a performance score ≥2 were excluded. Patients who received RT after (m)FOLFIRINOX were matched 1:1 by nearest neighbor propensity scores with patients who did not receive RT. Propensity scores were calculated using sex, age (≤70 vs >70 years), WHO performance score (0 vs 1), tumor size (0-20 vs 21-40 vs >40 mm), tumor location (head/uncinate vs body/tail), number of cycles (1-4 vs 5-8 vs >8), and baseline CA 19-9 level (≤500 vs >500 U/mL). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 531 patients who received neoadjuvant (m)FOLFIRINOX for BR PDAC, 424 met inclusion criteria and 300 (70.8%) were propensity score-matched. After matching, median OS was 26.2 months (95% CI, 24.0-38.4) with RT versus 32.8 months (95% CI, 25.3-42.0) without RT (P=.71). RT was associated with a lower resection rate (55.3% vs 72.7%; P=.002). In patients who underwent a resection, RT was associated with a comparable margin-negative resection rate (>1 mm) (70.6% vs 64.8%; P=.51), more node-negative disease (57.3% vs 37.6%; P=.01), and more major pathologic response with <5% tumor viability (24.7% vs 8.3%; P=.006). The OS associated with conventional and stereotactic body RT approaches was similar (median OS, 25.7 vs 26.0 months; P=.92). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BR PDAC, neoadjuvant RT following (m)FOLFIRINOX was associated with more node-negative disease and better pathologic response in patients who underwent resection, yet no difference in OS was found. Routine use of RT cannot be recommended based on these data.
BACKGROUND: The value of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, with or without dose modifications [(m)FOLFIRINOX], for patients with borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is uncertain. METHODS: We conducted an international retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients with BR PDAC who received (m)FOLFIRINOX as initial treatment (2012-2019) from the Trans-Atlantic Pancreatic Surgery Consortium. Because the decision to administer RT is made after chemotherapy, patients with metastases or deterioration after (m)FOLFIRINOX or a performance score ≥2 were excluded. Patients who received RT after (m)FOLFIRINOX were matched 1:1 by nearest neighbor propensity scores with patients who did not receive RT. Propensity scores were calculated using sex, age (≤70 vs >70 years), WHO performance score (0 vs 1), tumor size (0-20 vs 21-40 vs >40 mm), tumor location (head/uncinate vs body/tail), number of cycles (1-4 vs 5-8 vs >8), and baseline CA 19-9 level (≤500 vs >500 U/mL). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 531 patients who received neoadjuvant (m)FOLFIRINOX for BR PDAC, 424 met inclusion criteria and 300 (70.8%) were propensity score-matched. After matching, median OS was 26.2 months (95% CI, 24.0-38.4) with RT versus 32.8 months (95% CI, 25.3-42.0) without RT (P=.71). RT was associated with a lower resection rate (55.3% vs 72.7%; P=.002). In patients who underwent a resection, RT was associated with a comparable margin-negative resection rate (>1 mm) (70.6% vs 64.8%; P=.51), more node-negative disease (57.3% vs 37.6%; P=.01), and more major pathologic response with <5% tumor viability (24.7% vs 8.3%; P=.006). The OS associated with conventional and stereotactic body RT approaches was similar (median OS, 25.7 vs 26.0 months; P=.92). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BR PDAC, neoadjuvant RT following (m)FOLFIRINOX was associated with more node-negative disease and better pathologic response in patients who underwent resection, yet no difference in OS was found. Routine use of RT cannot be recommended based on these data.
Authors: Thierry Conroy; Pascal Hammel; Mohamed Hebbar; Meher Ben Abdelghani; Alice C Wei; Jean-Luc Raoul; Laurence Choné; Eric Francois; Pascal Artru; James J Biagi; Thierry Lecomte; Eric Assenat; Roger Faroux; Marc Ychou; Julien Volet; Alain Sauvanet; Gilles Breysacher; Frédéric Di Fiore; Christine Cripps; Petr Kavan; Patrick Texereau; Karine Bouhier-Leporrier; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Jean-Louis Legoux; Béata Juzyna; Sophie Gourgou; Christopher J O'Callaghan; Claire Jouffroy-Zeller; Patrick Rat; David Malka; Florence Castan; Jean-Baptiste Bachet Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Susanna W L de Geus; Mariam F Eskander; Gyulnara G Kasumova; Sing Chau Ng; Tara S Kent; Joseph D Mancias; Mark P Callery; Anand Mahadevan; Jennifer F Tseng Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Leila T Tchelebi; Eric J Lehrer; Daniel M Trifiletti; Navesh K Sharma; Niraj J Gusani; Christopher H Crane; Nicholas G Zaorsky Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Quisette P Janssen; Stefan Buettner; Mustafa Suker; Berend R Beumer; Pietro Addeo; Philippe Bachellier; Nathan Bahary; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Maria A Bali; Marc G Besselink; Brian A Boone; Ian Chau; Stephen Clarke; Mary Dillhoff; Bassel F El-Rayes; Jessica M Frakes; Derek Grose; Peter J Hosein; Nigel B Jamieson; Ammar A Javed; Khurum Khan; Kyu-Pyo Kim; Song Cheol Kim; Sunhee S Kim; Andrew H Ko; Jill Lacy; Georgios A Margonis; Martin D McCarter; Colin J McKay; Eric A Mellon; Sing Yu Moorcraft; Ken-Ichi Okada; Alessandro Paniccia; Parag J Parikh; Niek A Peters; Hans Rabl; Jaswinder Samra; Christoph Tinchon; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Eran van Veldhuisen; Andrea Wang-Gillam; Matthew J Weiss; Johanna W Wilmink; Hiroki Yamaue; Marjolein Y V Homs; Casper H J van Eijck; Matthew H G Katz; Bas Groot Koerkamp Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Matthew H G Katz; Fang-Shu Ou; Joseph M Herman; Syed A Ahmad; Brian Wolpin; Robert Marsh; Spencer Behr; Qian Shi; Michael Chuong; Lawrence H Schwartz; Wendy Frankel; Eric Collisson; Eugene J Koay; JoLeen M Hubbard; James L Leenstra; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Eileen O'Reilly Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: M Y V Homs; G van Tienhoven; M G Besselink; J W Wilmink; Q P Janssen; J L van Dam; B A Bonsing; H Bos; K P Bosscha; P P L O Coene; C H J van Eijck; I H J T de Hingh; T M Karsten; M B van der Kolk; G A Patijn; M S L Liem; H C van Santvoort; O J L Loosveld; J de Vos-Geelen; B M Zonderhuis; B Groot Koerkamp Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 4.430