Literature DB >> 35830503

Contribution of individual features to repetition suppression in macaque inferotemporal cortex.

Nathaniel P Williams1,2,3, Carl R Olson1,2,3.   

Abstract

When an image is presented twice in succession, neurons in area TE of macaque inferotemporal cortex exhibit repetition suppression, responding less strongly to the second presentation than to the first. Suppression is known to occur if the adapter and the test image are subtly different from each other. However, it is not known whether cross suppression occurs between images that are radically different from each other but that share a subset of features. To explore this issue, we measured repetition suppression using colored shapes. On interleaved trials, the test image might be identical to the adapter, might share its shape or color alone, or might differ from it totally. At the level of the neuronal population as a whole, suppression was especially deep when adapter and test were identical, intermediate when they shared only one attribute, and minimal when they shared neither attribute. At the level of the individual neuron, the degree of suppression depended not only on the properties of the two images but also on the preferences of the neuron. Suppression was deeper when the repeated color or shape was preferred by the neuron than when it was not. This effect might arise from feature-specific adaptation or alternatively from adapter-induced fatigue. Both mechanisms conform to the principle that the degree of suppression is determined by the preferences of the neuron.NEW & NOTEWORTHY When an image is presented twice in rapid succession, neurons of inferotemporal cortex exhibit repetition suppression, responding less strongly to the second than to the first presentation. It has been unclear whether this phenomenon depends on the selectivity of the neuron under study. Here, we show that, for a given neuron, suppression is deepest when features preferred by that neuron are repeated. The results argue for a mechanism based either on feature-specific suppression or fatigue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inferotemporal cortex; macaque; repetition suppression; rhesus macaque; visual cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35830503      PMCID: PMC9359640          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00475.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.974


  43 in total

1.  Distributed Attention Is Implemented through Theta-Rhythmic Gamma Modulation.

Authors:  Ayelet Nina Landau; Helene Marianne Schreyer; Stan van Pelt; Pascal Fries
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Habituation-like decrease in the responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex of the macaque.

Authors:  E K Miller; P M Gochin; C G Gross
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Repetition suppression in monkey inferotemporal cortex: relation to behavioral priming.

Authors:  David B T McMahon; Carl R Olson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Time course and stimulus dependence of repetition-induced response suppression in inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Scott O Murray; Bharathi Jagadeesh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  E K Miller; L Li; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-11-29       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Theta oscillations modulate attentional search performance periodically.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Philippe Marque; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Divisive Normalization Predicts Adaptation-Induced Response Changes in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex.

Authors:  Dzmitry A Kaliukhovich; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Scopolamine affects short-term memory but not inferior temporal neurons.

Authors:  E K Miller; R Desimone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Pinpointing the neural signatures of single-exposure visual recognition memory.

Authors:  Vahid Mehrpour; Travis Meyer; Eero P Simoncelli; Nicole C Rust
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Mechanisms underlying sharpening of visual response dynamics with familiarity.

Authors:  Sukbin Lim
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.