Sara Hasani1, Julian A Feller2,3, Kate E Webster2. 1. La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. S.Hasani@latrobe.edu.au. 2. La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 3. OrthoSport Victoria, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Having a family history of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury has been investigated in the literature but few studies have focused on this factor specifically or reported their outcomes by sex. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically review family history as a risk factor for sustaining a primary ACL injury and the impact it has on ACL graft rupture or contralateral ACL injury in male and female individuals. METHODS: A literature search was completed in seven databases from inception until March 2021 to investigate primary and subsequent ACL injuries in those with a family history of ACL injury. Articles were screened by prespecified inclusion criteria, and the methodological quality of each study was determined. Study results were combined using an odds ratio (OR) meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis was also completed by sex for primary ACL injury, as well as by graft rupture and contralateral ACL injury for subsequent ACL injuries. RESULTS: Twelve studies were acquired for systematic review and meta-analysis. Four studies that investigated primary ACL injury, seven that investigated ACL graft and/or contralateral ACL ruptures and one study that investigated both primary and subsequent ACL injury. Having a family history of ACL injury increased the odds of injury across all outcomes. Those with a family history had a 2.5 times greater odds for sustaining a primary ACL injury (OR 2.53 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.96-3.28, p < 0.001)]. There was no significant difference of injury odds for primary ACL injury when analysed by sex. Family history of ACL injury was found to increase the odds of subsequent ACL injury by 2.38 (95% CI 1.64-3.46, p < 0.001) and was significant for both graft ruptures (OR 1.80 [95% CI 1.20-2.71, p = 0.005]) and contralateral ACL injuries (OR 2.28 [95% CI 1.28-4.04, p = 0.005]). When compared directly, the odds of sustaining a graft rupture versus a contralateral ACL injury were similar for those with a family history. Outcomes were not frequently reported by sex for subsequent ACL injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Having a family history of ACL injury more than doubles the odds of sustaining a primary or subsequent ACL injury. However, if a family history of ACL injury is present, the sex of the athlete does not increase the risk for primary injury nor is there a difference in the risk for a subsequent graft rupture compared to a contralateral ACL injury. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42020186472.
BACKGROUND: Having a family history of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury has been investigated in the literature but few studies have focused on this factor specifically or reported their outcomes by sex. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically review family history as a risk factor for sustaining a primary ACL injury and the impact it has on ACL graft rupture or contralateral ACL injury in male and female individuals. METHODS: A literature search was completed in seven databases from inception until March 2021 to investigate primary and subsequent ACL injuries in those with a family history of ACL injury. Articles were screened by prespecified inclusion criteria, and the methodological quality of each study was determined. Study results were combined using an odds ratio (OR) meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis was also completed by sex for primary ACL injury, as well as by graft rupture and contralateral ACL injury for subsequent ACL injuries. RESULTS: Twelve studies were acquired for systematic review and meta-analysis. Four studies that investigated primary ACL injury, seven that investigated ACL graft and/or contralateral ACL ruptures and one study that investigated both primary and subsequent ACL injury. Having a family history of ACL injury increased the odds of injury across all outcomes. Those with a family history had a 2.5 times greater odds for sustaining a primary ACL injury (OR 2.53 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.96-3.28, p < 0.001)]. There was no significant difference of injury odds for primary ACL injury when analysed by sex. Family history of ACL injury was found to increase the odds of subsequent ACL injury by 2.38 (95% CI 1.64-3.46, p < 0.001) and was significant for both graft ruptures (OR 1.80 [95% CI 1.20-2.71, p = 0.005]) and contralateral ACL injuries (OR 2.28 [95% CI 1.28-4.04, p = 0.005]). When compared directly, the odds of sustaining a graft rupture versus a contralateral ACL injury were similar for those with a family history. Outcomes were not frequently reported by sex for subsequent ACL injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Having a family history of ACL injury more than doubles the odds of sustaining a primary or subsequent ACL injury. However, if a family history of ACL injury is present, the sex of the athlete does not increase the risk for primary injury nor is there a difference in the risk for a subsequent graft rupture compared to a contralateral ACL injury. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42020186472.
Authors: Simon Thompson; Lucy Salmon; Alison Waller; James Linklater; Justin Roe; Leo Pinczewski Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Joshua T Bram; Nicolas Pascual-Leone; Neeraj M Patel; Christopher J DeFrancesco; Nakul S Talathi; Theodore J Ganley Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2020-10-30