Literature DB >> 35822604

Reply to Romano et al.

Gowthanan Santhirakumaran1, Ali Abbasi2, Mohammad Shah3, Ian Hunt1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chest wall conditions; Dynamic ultrasound of chest wall; Slipping rib syndrome

Year:  2022        PMID: 35822604      PMCID: PMC9282267          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivac172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


× No keyword cloud information.
We commend Romano et al. [1] in detailing an interesting sign for slipping rib syndrome (SRS). As widely understood, SRS is commonly a clinical diagnosis. However, as illustrated by this case series, the emergence of ultrasound has allowed clinicians to identify SRS more confidently, adding to a positive hook manoeuvre [2]. The associated atrophy of rectus abdominis muscle in this case series implicates it because of nerve entrapment and also further worsens the costal cartilage instability. However, this finding could also be used to improve treatment of SRS. Surgical intervention has been identified as the mainstay for SRS, however, with this finding, physiotherapy can be key prior to consideration of surgery, as increasing core strength can improve costal arch stability and in turn, patient symptoms [3]. However, this can be proven to be difficult as the very movements in the exercises can precipitate pain, and therefore, surgical resection has maintained its gold standard. In our experience, we have found ultrasound to be a crucial investigative tool in diagnosing and managing SRS. Ultrasound imaging provides a useful static image of muscle hypotrophy as detailed excellently in this SRS case series, however, the dynamic use of ultrasound can be argued to be a more important investigation in diagnosing SRS. This has already been reported by thoracic surgeons and musculoskeletal radiologists who treat SRS as vital to their practice with promising results. We have implemented a protocol for the use of dynamic ultrasound of the chest wall in our unit as a diagnostic tool in patients suspected of SRS. By having patients reproduce the movements causing pain, dynamic ultrasound of the chest wall performed by a specialist musculoskeletal radiologist can delineate anatomy and illustrate the excursion of the costal cartilage to the rib above, causing nerve entrapment and in turn, pain in real time [4]. This not only reduces the room for interpretation as commonly found with the hook manoeuvre but also adds important information to the surgeon in preoperative planning. Dynamic ultrasound of the chest wall can illustrate exactly which rib tip’s hypermobility is causing the pain and can aid identification for targeted diagnostic/therapeutic intercostal nerve blocks as well as costal cartilage resection [4-6]. In conclusion, the case series of Romano et al. provides new knowledge for a relatively underdiagnosed condition and illustrate the increasing importance of ultrasound imaging, for which we point the emergence of its dynamic use in SRS.
  5 in total

1.  Dynamic ultrasound in the evaluation of patients with suspected slipping rib syndrome.

Authors:  Dane Van Tassel; Lisa E McMahon; Monique Riemann; Kevin Wong; Craig E Barnes
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Slipping rib syndrome: a place for sonography in the diagnosis of a frequently overlooked cause of abdominal or low thoracic pain.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Meuwly; Stephan Wicky; Pierre Schnyder; Domenico Lepori
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Slipping rib syndrome.

Authors:  G J Heinz; D C Zavala
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-02-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A new sign of the slipping rib syndrome?

Authors:  Rosalia Romano; Diego Gavezzoli; Maria Sole Gallazzi; Mauro Roberto Benvenuti
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-01-18

Review 5.  Slipping Rib Syndrome: A review of evaluation, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Lisa E McMahon
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Surg       Date:  2018-05-27       Impact factor: 2.754

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.