Background: Patellar dislocation can lead to instability, pain, limited function, and recurrent dislocations. Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction leads to favorable patient reported outcomes, but many patients fail to return to previous activity levels. The purpose of this study is to determine how well patients do after MPFL reconstruction and to determine the most important factors for evaluation of patellar instability following MPFL reconstruction. Methods: After IRB approval, a retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction from January 2006 to January 2014 by two board-certified sports orthopaedic surgeons. Patients were then contacted to complete a follow-up questionnaire about satisfaction, functional status, pain, and patellar stability. Patients with at least one-year of follow-up data, a complete data set, and a completed questionnaire were included in the final analysis. Charts of 100 patients were reviewed and 54 patients met all criteria for inclusion in the study. Chi-square analysis, t-tests, and multivariate and univariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the effects of multiple variables on return to activity, satisfaction, and function while controlling for covariates with p<0.05 considered significant. Results: When asked about subluxation, 20% (11/54) reported recurrent patellar subluxation (without re-dislocation). Of the 11 patients who reported re-subluxation, 54% (6/11) reported being highly satisfied (rating of 9-10/10) with the outcome of their knee. Of the 54 patients, 54% (29/54) did not return to previous levels of activity, nevertheless, 31% (9/29) of these 29 patients reported being highly satisfied with the outcome of their knee. Conclusion: Patients report high levels of satisfaction even if they have recurrent instability or are unable to return to prior activity levels. Current scoring systems do not accurately depict patients' post-operative outcomes after MPFL Reconstruction. Level of Evidence: III.
Background: Patellar dislocation can lead to instability, pain, limited function, and recurrent dislocations. Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction leads to favorable patient reported outcomes, but many patients fail to return to previous activity levels. The purpose of this study is to determine how well patients do after MPFL reconstruction and to determine the most important factors for evaluation of patellar instability following MPFL reconstruction. Methods: After IRB approval, a retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction from January 2006 to January 2014 by two board-certified sports orthopaedic surgeons. Patients were then contacted to complete a follow-up questionnaire about satisfaction, functional status, pain, and patellar stability. Patients with at least one-year of follow-up data, a complete data set, and a completed questionnaire were included in the final analysis. Charts of 100 patients were reviewed and 54 patients met all criteria for inclusion in the study. Chi-square analysis, t-tests, and multivariate and univariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the effects of multiple variables on return to activity, satisfaction, and function while controlling for covariates with p<0.05 considered significant. Results: When asked about subluxation, 20% (11/54) reported recurrent patellar subluxation (without re-dislocation). Of the 11 patients who reported re-subluxation, 54% (6/11) reported being highly satisfied (rating of 9-10/10) with the outcome of their knee. Of the 54 patients, 54% (29/54) did not return to previous levels of activity, nevertheless, 31% (9/29) of these 29 patients reported being highly satisfied with the outcome of their knee. Conclusion: Patients report high levels of satisfaction even if they have recurrent instability or are unable to return to prior activity levels. Current scoring systems do not accurately depict patients' post-operative outcomes after MPFL Reconstruction. Level of Evidence: III.
Authors: Christopher L Camp; Aaron J Krych; Diane L Dahm; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2010-08-17 Impact factor: 6.202