Literature DB >> 35821942

A Large Number of Reviews on Physician Rating Websites May Reflect Reputation Management.

Shyam Ramachandran1, David Ring1, David Langerhuizen1, Gregg Vagner1.   

Abstract

Background: Physicians with a large number of reviews and a high rating may be employing reputation management strategies. Specialists may be more likely than non-specialists to employ such strategies. This should be apparent in a study of online physician reviews on physician rating websites (PRW).
Methods: Using one physician rating website, we gathered orthopedic surgeon and family physician reviews. We measured Spearman correlations between the number of reviews and average numerical rating and used chi-squared to test threshold relationships.
Results: There were very small negative Spear-man correlations between the number of online reviews and the average numerical rating for orthopedic surgeons (p= -0.097, p-value=<0.001) family medicine physicians (p= -0.170, p-value=<0.001; Figure 2). Physicians with more than 100 reviews had a greater average numerical rating than physicians with fewer than 50 reviews. Orthopedic surgeons are more likely than family medicine physicians to have a large number of reviews and average numerical rating greater than 3.
Conclusion: The small fraction of physician with a high number of reviews may be utilizing reputation management strategies, and this seems relatively specific to specialists rather than non-specialists. Level of Evidence: III.
Copyright © The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias; family medicine; online ratings; online reviews; orthopedics; reputation management

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35821942      PMCID: PMC9210437     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  7 in total

1.  Manage your online reputation--or someone else will.

Authors:  Richard M Escoffery; Joseph G Bauer
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.283

2.  A five-star doctor? Online rating of physicians by patients in an internet driven world.

Authors:  Li Ma; Alan D Kaye; Matthew Bean; Ngoc Vo; Xiulu Ruan
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Managing an online reputation.

Authors:  Edie E Zusman
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Does experience matter? A meta-analysis of physician rating websites of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Authors:  R A Jack; M B Burn; P C McCulloch; S R Liberman; K E Varner; J D Harris
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-08-29

5.  Website Characteristics and Physician Reviews on Commercial Physician-Rating Websites.

Authors:  Tara Lagu; Katherine Metayer; Michael Moran; Leidy Ortiz; Aruna Priya; Sarah L Goff; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Online reviews of 500 urologists.

Authors:  Chandy Ellimoottil; Alissa Hart; Kristin Greco; Marcus L Quek; Ahmer Farooq
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites.

Authors:  Ralf Terlutter; Sonja Bidmon; Johanna Röttl
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.