Literature DB >> 35821429

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) in patients with unstable ankle fracture.

Diederick Penning1, Suzanne Kleipool2, Susan van Dieren3, Siem M Dingemans1, Tim Schepers4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) is a widely used validated Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM). For clinical research, it is important to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). The objective of this study was to determine the MCID of the OMAS at several moments in the follow-up, in a cohort of patients that underwent open reduction and internal fixation of unstable ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for this descriptive study were extracted from a prospective randomized controlled trial, the RODEO trial. The Dutch version of the OMAS was completed at 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up and estimated at baseline. The used anchor-based methods were: mean change and ROC curve. The distribution-based methods were: 0.5SD and minimal detectable change (MDC).
RESULTS: This cohort included 148 patients. The mean OMAS score in the group with minimal improvement between 3 and 6 months was 15.0 (SD 17.5, 95%CI 9.4-20.6) and between 6 and 12 months 9.5 (SD 17.1, 95% CI 3.1-15.9). The ROC curve between 3 and 6 months resulted in a MCID of 12.5 (AUC 0.72) and between 6 and 12 months, the MCID was 7.5 (AUC 0.78). Using 0.5 SD, the MCID was 10.52 (SD 21.04) at 3 months, 11.37 (SD 22.73) at 6 months and 10.47 (SD 20.94) at 12 months. The MDC was 4.72 at 3 months, 5.20 at 6 months and 4.71 at 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The calculated MCID in patients following surgery for unstable ankle fractures ranges from 10.5 to 15.0 at 3-6-month follow-up and from 7.5 to 11.4 at 6-12-month follow-up, depending on moment and method.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle fracture; Measurement properties; Minimal clinical important difference; Olerud Molander ankle score; Patient-reported outcomes

Year:  2022        PMID: 35821429     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04533-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   2.928


  19 in total

1.  Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Ross D Crosby; Ronette L Kolotkin; G Rhys Williams
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  An evaluation of the measurement properties of the Olerud Molander Ankle Score in adults with an ankle fracture.

Authors:  Rebecca McKeown; Helen Parsons; David R Ellard; Rebecca S Kearney
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.358

3.  A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture.

Authors:  C Olerud; H Molander
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1984

4.  Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Leo D Roorda; Joost Dekker; Sita M Bierma-Zeinstra; George Peat; Kelvin P Jordan; Peter Croft; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of Olerud-Molander Ankle Score in Patients With Malleolar Fracture.

Authors:  Nihal Büker; Raziye Şavkın; Oğuzhan Gökalp; Nusret Ök
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 1.286

6.  Three week versus six week immobilisation for stable Weber B type ankle fractures: randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority clinical trial.

Authors:  Tero Kortekangas; Heidi Haapasalo; Tapio Flinkkilä; Pasi Ohtonen; Simo Nortunen; Heikki-Jussi Laine; Teppo Ln Järvinen; Harri Pakarinen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-01-23

7.  Primary outcome measures used in interventional trials for ankle fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca McKeown; Abdul-Rasheed Rabiu; David R Ellard; Rebecca S Kearney
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  The Swedish version of OMAS is a reliable and valid outcome measure for patients with ankle fractures.

Authors:  Gertrud M Nilsson; Magnus Eneroth; Charlotte S Ekdahl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Evaluation of three patient reported outcome measures following operative fixation of closed ankle fractures.

Authors:  Andrew M Garratt; Markus G Naumann; Ulf Sigurdsen; Stein Erik Utvåg; Knut Stavem
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS).

Authors:  Egemen Turhan; Murat Demirel; Alişan Daylak; Gazi Huri; Mahmut Nedim Doral; Derya Çelik
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 1.511

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.