Literature DB >> 35821373

Establishing the Pharmacokinetics of Genetic Vaccines is Essential for Maximising their Safety and Efficacy.

Imad Naasani1.   

Abstract

In a typical course of drug development, thorough pharmacokinetic (PK) studies are essential for the determination of drug biodistribution, dosage and efficacy without toxicity. For vaccines, however, unless a new formulation component is used, most regulatory agencies rule out the need for studying the biodistribution of the vaccine antigenic material per se, and only dose-immunogenicity studies are performed. This is because traditional vaccines are meant to directly induce immunogenicity by locally recruiting immunocytes that will carry on with the pursuing immunogenic processes. Thus, the clinical outcome from traditional vaccines is determined mainly by an immunological response phase. Yet, the case is significantly different for the emergent genetic vaccines (vectorised DNA or mRNA vaccines), where the clinical outcome is dependent on a combination of two major response phases: a pharmacological phase that involves biodistribution, assimilation, gene translation and epitope(s) presentation, followed by an immunological phase, which is similar to that of traditional vaccines. From a mathematical perspective, processes involved in drug administration are typically subject to inter- and intra-patient statistical distributions like most physiological processes. Therefore, the clinical outcome after administering genetic vaccines obeys a statistical probability distribution combined of the sum of two major response probability distributions, pharmacological and immunological. This implies that the variance coefficient of the summed response probability distributions has a larger value than the variance of each underlying distribution. In other words, due to the multi-phased mode of action of genetic vaccines, their clinical outcome has more variability than that of traditional vaccines. This observation points toward the necessity for regulating genetic vaccines in a similar manner to bio-therapeutics to ensure better efficacy and safety. A structural PK model is provided to predict the sources of variability, biodistribution and dose optimisation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35821373     DOI: 10.1007/s40262-022-01149-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   5.577


  11 in total

1.  Common noncompartmental pharmacokinetic variables: are they normally or log-normally distributed?

Authors:  L F Lacey; O N Keene; J F Pritchard; A Bye
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 2.  Optimizing nanomedicine pharmacokinetics using physiologically based pharmacokinetics modelling.

Authors:  Darren Michael Moss; Marco Siccardi
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Checking distributional assumptions for pharmacokinetic summary statistics based on simulations with compartmental models.

Authors:  Meiyu Shen; Estelle Russek-Cohen; Eric V Slud
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 4.  The common patterns of nature.

Authors:  S A Frank
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 5.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Dongfen Yuan; Hua He; Yun Wu; Jianghong Fan; Yanguang Cao
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 6.  Population pharmacokinetic modelling of indium-based quantum dot nanoparticles: preclinical in vivo studies.

Authors:  Elnaz Yaghini; Elisa Tacconi; Andrew Pilling; Paula Rahman; Joe Broughton; Imad Naasani; Mohammed R S Keshtgar; Alexander J MacRobert; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.384

7.  Post RNA-based COVID vaccines myocarditis: Proposed mechanisms.

Authors:  Kamran Kadkhoda
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 8.  Age-Related Vulnerability to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Biological, Contextual, and Policy-Related Factors.

Authors:  Eileen M Crimmins
Journal:  Public Policy Aging Rep       Date:  2020-09-07

Review 9.  COVID-19 vaccines: modes of immune activation and future challenges.

Authors:  John R Teijaro; Donna L Farber
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 53.106

10.  Hypersensitivity Myocarditis after COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination.

Authors:  Andrea Frustaci; Romina Verardo; Nicola Galea; Carlo Lavalle; Giulia Bagnato; Rossella Scialla; Cristina Chimenti
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.