| Literature DB >> 35821343 |
Antonella Meloni1,2, Luigi Barbuto3, Laura Pistoia1, Vincenzo Positano1,2, Stefania Renne4, Giuseppe Peritore5, Priscilla Fina6, Anna Spasiano7, Massimo Allò8, Giuseppe Messina9, Tommaso Casini10, Antonella Massa11, Luigia Romano3, Alessia Pepe12, Filippo Cademartiri13.
Abstract
We evaluated frequency, pattern, and associations of renal iron accumulation in sickle/β-thalassemia. Thirty-three sickle/β-thalassemia patients (36.5 ± 14.7 years; 13 females), 14 homozygous sickle cell disease (SCD) patients, and 71 thalassemia major (TM) patients, enrolled in the E-MIOT Network, underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Iron overload (IO) was quantified by the T2* technique. Sickle/β-thalassemia patients had a significantly lower frequency of renal IO (T2* < 31 ms) than homozygous SCD patients (9.1% vs. 57.1%; P = 0.001), besides having similar hepatic, cardiac and pancreatic IO. Kidney T2* values were comparable between regularly transfused sickle/β-thalassemia and TM patients but were significantly lower in regularly transfused homozygous SCD patients than in the other two groups. In sickle/β-thalassemia patients, global renal T2* values were not associated with age, gender, splenectomy, and presence of regular transfusions or chelation. No correlation was detected between renal T2* values and serum ferritin levels or iron load in the other organs. Global renal T2* values were not associated with serum creatinine levels but showed a significant inverse correlation with serum lactate dehydrogenase (R = - 0.709; P < 0.0001) and indirect bilirubin (R = - 0.462; P = 0.012). Renal IO is not common in sickle/β-thalassemia patients, with a prevalence significantly lower compared to that of homozygous SCD patients, but with a similar underlying mechanism due to the chronic hemolysis.Entities:
Keywords: Iron overload; Kidneys; Magnetic resonance imaging; Sickle/β-thalassemia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35821343 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-022-04915-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Hematol ISSN: 0939-5555 Impact factor: 4.030