Literature DB >> 35819723

Long-term outcome of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis seeking nonoperative treatment after a mean follow-up of 42 years.

Christoph J Laux1, Method Kabelitz1, Mazda Farshad2, Tobias Götschi1,3, David E Bauer1, Thomas Böni1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects up to 3% of otherwise healthy adolescents. The extreme long-term outcomes of nonoperative treatment are underreported. This study aimed to investigate the long-term outcome of nonoperative-treated AIS patients. Comparison between a bracing and an observation approach were performed.
METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, 20 nonoperatively treated AIS patients were observed concerning patient-related outcome measures (PROM) (visual analog scale (VAS), Short Form Health Survey 36 item (SF 36), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS 24), Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (ODI), Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI)), radiological curve progression and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Baseline characteristics and radiological imaging were collected. At follow-up, anteroposterior and lateral X-rays as well as questionnaires were analyzed.
RESULTS: Twenty patients (16 females, mean age: 14.6 ± 3.2 years) with a follow-up time of 42 ± 9 years were included. Nine patients (initial Cobb 35° ± 19°) were treated with bracing for a mean time of 26 ± 9 months, while the other 11 patients (initial Cobb 29° ± 11°) were observed. The primary curve progressed from 32° ± 15° to 52° ± 25° in average with no significant difference between the cohorts (p = 0.371). At final follow-up, a mean ODI score of 7 ± 7.9 points with no difference depending on the treatment (p = 0.668) was seen. No significant differences were observed for PROMs. Curve magnitude correlated neither at diagnosis (p = 0.617) nor at follow-up (p = 0.535) with the ODI score at final follow-up.
CONCLUSION: After a mean of 42 years, patients with nonoperative treatment of moderate AIS demonstrated a good clinical outcome despite progression of the deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Bracing; Long-term results; Nonoperative treatment; Spinal deformity

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35819723      PMCID: PMC9579110          DOI: 10.1007/s43390-022-00541-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  26 in total

1.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  The Natural History of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.324

3.  Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument.

Authors:  M A Asher; S Min Lai; D C Burton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Nonoperative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 10- to 60-year follow-up with special reference to health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Mathias Haefeli; Achim Elfering; Reinhold Kilian; Kan Min; Norbert Boos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Relevant impact of surgery on quality of life for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : a registry-based two-year follow-up cohort study.

Authors:  Raf H Mens; Pepijn Bisseling; Marinus de Kleuver; Miranda L van Hooff
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; James G Wright; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; Jack C Y Cheng; Aina Danielsson; Jose A Morcuende
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Bracing Success Is Influenced by Time in Brace: Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of BrAIST and ISICO Cohorts.

Authors:  Lori A Dolan; Sabrina Donzelli; Fabio Zaina; Stuart L Weinstein; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Health-related quality-of-life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients 25 years after treatment.

Authors:  Ane Simony; Emil Jesper Hansen; Leah Y Carreon; Steen Bach Christensen; Mikkel Osterheden Andersen
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-07-16

Review 10.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: current concepts on neurological and muscular etiologies.

Authors:  Marcelo Wajchenberg; Nelson Astur; Michel Kanas; Délio Eulálio Martins
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2016-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.