Literature DB >> 35817249

Usefulness of the Legionella Score for differentiating from COVID-19 pneumonia to legionella pneumonia.

Naoyuki Miyashita1, Futoshi Higa2, Yosuke Aoki3, Toshiaki Kikuchi4, Masafumi Seki5, Kazuhiro Tateda6, Nobuko Maki7, Kazuhiro Uchino8, Hiroshi Kiyota9, Akira Watanabe10.   

Abstract

Legionella pneumophila is a major causative pathogen of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but recently the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) became the most common causative pathogen of CAP. Because L. pneumophila CAP is clinically distinct from bacterial CAPs, the Japan Society for Chemotherapy (JSC) developed a simple scoring system, the Legionella Score, using six parameters for the presumptive diagnosis of L. pneumophila pneumonia. We investigated the clinical and laboratory differences of L. pneumophila CAP and COVID-19 CAP and validated the Legionella Score in both CAP groups. We analyzed 102 patients with L. pneumophila CAP and 956 patients with COVID-19 CAP. Dyspnea and psychiatric symptoms were more frequently observed and cough was less frequently observed in patients with L. pneumophila CAP than those with COVID-19 CAP. Loss of taste and anosmia were observed in patients with COVID-19 CAP but not observed in those with L. pneumophila CAP. C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase levels in L. pneumophila CAP group were significantly higher than in the COVID-19 CAP group. In contrast, sodium level in the L. pneumophila CAP group was significantly lower than in the COVID-19 CAP group. The median Legionella Score was significantly higher in the L. pneumophila CAP group than the COVID-19 CAP group (score 4 vs 2, p < 0.001). Our results demonstrated that the JSC Legionella Score had good diagnostic ability during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, physicians should consider COVID-19 CAP when loss of taste and/or anosmia are observed regardless of the Legionella Score.
Copyright © 2022 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Community-acquired pneumonia; Legionella pneumophila; Legionella score; SARS-CoV-2

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35817249      PMCID: PMC9264724          DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1341-321X            Impact factor:   2.065


community-acquired pneumonia C-reactive protein Coronavirus disease 2019 Japan Society for Chemotherapy Japanese Respiratory Society lactate dehydrogenase polymerase chain reaction Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Introduction

Legionella pneumonia accounts for 2–9% of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) cases and is associated with high morbidity, as shown by the high proportion of patients requiring intensive care unit admission [[1], [2], [3]]. Legionella pneumophila was identified as the causative pathogen in more than 80% of Legionella pneumonia cases. Although the diagnosis of L. pneumophila pneumonia is dependent on a urinary antigen test, high-quality studies showed low sensitivity for this test [4]. Because L. pneumophila pneumonia has several clinical features [5], clinical scoring systems for the presumptive diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia have been proposed [[6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]]. The Japan Society for Chemotherapy (JSC) Legionella study group also developed a scoring system, the Legionella Score, to distinguish patients with L. pneumophila CAP and other types of CAP [12]. The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an ongoing pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [13]. Since December 2019, more than 500 million infected cases have been reported worldwide. At present, SARS-CoV-2 has become the most common causative pathogen of CAP. In the previous study, we evaluated the Legionella Score using the major CAP causative pathogens, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae [5]. Our results demonstrated the median Legionella Score was significantly higher in the L. pneumophila pneumonia group than the S. pneumoniae CAP group and M. pneumoniae CAP group. The JSC Legionella study group need to continue to verify scoring system to distinguish patients with L. pneumophila CAP and other types of CAP. In the present study, we investigated the clinical and laboratory differences of L. pneumophila CAP and COVID-19 CAP. In addition, the Legionella Score proposed by the JSC Legionella study group was further validated in an independent CAP cohort that included both L. pneumophila and COVID-19.

Patients and methods

Patients

All adult patients with CAP [14] who visited Kansai Medical University Hospital, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Kansai Medical University Kori Hospital, Kansai Medical University Kuzuha Hospital, or Kansai Medical University Temmabashi General Clinic, Osaka, Japan from January 2012 to December 2021, were enrolled in this study. L. pneumophila was considered to be the definitive causative agent with a positive urinary antigen test, culture, and/or real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and/or a four-fold rise in antibody titer level between paired sera. COVID-19 was considered to be the definitive causative agent with a positive reverse transcription-PCR result from sputum or nasopharyngeal swab specimens in accordance with the protocol recommended by the National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan. The severity of pneumonia was evaluated using predictive rules via the A-DROP system proposed by the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) CAP guidelines [14]. Patients were stratified into four severity classes: 0 point = mild, 1 or 2 points = moderate, 3 points = severe and 4 or 5 points = extremely severe. Informed consent was obtained from all patients, and the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kansai Medical University (approval number 2020319).

Legionella Score

The JSC developed a simple Legionella diagnostic score using 176 patients with Legionella pneumonia and 419 patients with non-Legionella pneumonia [12]. The JSC extracted the six parameters as the Legionella Score; being male, absence of cough, having dyspnea, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level (≥18 mg/dL), high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level (≥260 U/L), and low sodium (Na) level (<134 mmol/L).

Statistical analysis

Discrete variables are expressed as counts (percentages) and continuous variables as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). Frequencies were compared using Fisher's exact test. Betweengroup comparisons of normally distributed data were performed using Student's t-test. Skewed data were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test.

Results

Patient characteristics

The patients who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for CAP caused by L. pneumophila or SARS-CoV-2 without any evidence of other causative pathogens formed the groups for comparison of the clinical presentation. We analyzed the 102 patients with L. pneumophila pneumonia and 956 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Among 102 patients with L. pneumophila CAP, 89 patients were urinary antigen test positive, 12 patients were culture positive, 26 patients were PCR positive, and 10 patients demonstrated a four-fold antibody seroconversion. During the study period, there were five waves of COVID-19 in Japan, the first to third waves involved the conventional strain, the fourth wave with lineage B.1.1.7 (Alpha variant), and the fifth wave with lineage B.1.617 (Delta variant). Of 956 patients with COVID-19 CAP, 422 had the conventional strain, 260 had the Alpha variant, and 274 had the Delta variant.

Differences between Legionella pneumophila and COVID-19 CAP groups

Background, clinical symptoms, and laboratory findings in patients with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia and COVID-19 pneumonia were shown in Table 1 . The median age and male frequency were significantly higher in patients with L. pneumophila CAP than those with COVID-19 CAP. Among comorbid illnesses, the frequency of chronic lung disease was significantly higher in patients with L. pneumophila CAP than those with COVID-19 CAP.
Table 1

Background, clinical symptoms and laboratory findings in patients with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia and COVID-19 pneumonia.

VariablesLegionella pneumophilaCOVID-19p-value
No. of patients102956
Median age (IQR), years67 (55–70)56 (42–70)<0.001
No. of males/females90/12599/357<0.001
No. (%) of patients with comorbid illnesses
 Chronic lung disease23 (22.5)107 (11.2)0.002
 Diabetes mellitus20 (19.6)167 (17.5)0.586
 Chronic heart disease7 (6.9)45 (4.7)0.333
 Chronic renal disease6 (5.9)28 (2.9)0.131
 Cerebrovascular disease6 (5.9)26 (2.7)0.116
 Chronic liver disease4 (3.9)24 (2.5)0.337
 Neoplastic disease2 (2.0)30 (3.1)0.762
 Autoimmune disease2 (2.0)23 (2.4)>0.999
No. (%) of patients with the following clinical signs and symptoms
 Dyspnea63 (61.8)293 (30.6)<0.001
 Sputum production51 (50.0)126 (13.2)<0.001
 Cough41 (40.2)604 (63.2)<0.001
 Psychiatric symptoms38 (37.3)18 (1.9)<0.001
 Gastrointestinal symptoms14 (13.7)104 (10.9)0.407
 Headache12 (11.8)121 (12.7)0.876
 Chest pain8 (7.8)27 (2.8)0.015
 Loss of taste0184 (19.2)<0.001
 Anosmia0167 (17.5)<0.001
Laboratory findings, median (IQR)
 White blood cell count,/μL11,300 (9200–14,100)5200 (4200–6700)<0.001
 C-reactive protein, mg/dL27.1 (22.3–33.1)4.4 (1.6–9.3)<0.001
 Aspartate aminotransferase, U/L62 (37–128)34 (23–52)<0.001
 Alanine aminotransferase, U/L47 (28–82)26 (18–43)<0.001
 Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L)326 (249–441)267 (200–405)<0.001
 Sodium (mmol/L)133 (131–138)136 (135–139)<0.001
No. (%) of patients with each pneumonia severity score
 Mild to moderate (0–2 points)79 (77.5)865 (90.5)<0.001
 Severe (3 points)20 (19.6)76 (7.9)<0.001
 Extremely severe (4 or 5 points)3 (2.9)15 (1.6)0.406

*IQRs, interquartile ranges (IQRs).

Background, clinical symptoms and laboratory findings in patients with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia and COVID-19 pneumonia. *IQRs, interquartile ranges (IQRs). Although dyspnea, sputum production, and psychosis were observed more frequently in patients with L. pneumophila CAP than those with COVID-19 CAP, cough was observed less frequently in patients with L. pneumophila CAP than those with COVID-19 CAP. Loss of taste and anosmia were observed in patients with COVID-19 CAP, but not observed in those with L. pneumophila CAP. However, we just confirmed symptoms commonly seen with pneumonia in patients with L. pneumophila CAP. We did not interview directly with or without loss of taste and anosmia in patients with L. pneumophila CAP. The median CRP and LDH levels in the L. pneumophila CAP group were 27.1 mg/dL and 326 U/L, respectively, which were significantly higher than in the COVID-19 CAP group. Median Na level in the L. pneumophila CAP group was 133 mmol/L which was significantly lower than in the COVID-19 CAP group.

Evaluation of the Legionella Score

Table 2 shows the number of patients in each Legionella Score in both CAP groups. Among COVID-19 cases median Legionella Score was identical the among conventional strain, Alpha variant and Delta variant. The median Legionella Score was significantly higher in the L. pneumophila CAP group than the COVID-19 CAP group (score 4 vs 2, p < 0.001). When the cutoff was score ≥4, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for presumptive diagnosis of L. pneumophila CAP were 86.3% and 88.4%, respectively.
Table 2

Legionella score in patients with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia and COVID-19 pneumonia.

VariablesLegionella pneumophilaCOVID-19
p-value
ConventionalStrainAlpha variantDelta variantTotal
No. of patients102422260274956
Legionella score
 Score 00522134107
 Score 101144493251
 Score 241477686309
 Score 310627937178
 Score 43734341785
 Score 537126624
 Score 6141012
 Median (IQR)4 (4–5)2 (1–3)2 (1.75–3)2 (1–2)2 (1–3)<0.001

*IQR, interquartile ranges (IQRs).

P value: 102 Legionella pneumophila pneumonia versus 956 COVID-19 pneumonia.

Legionella score in patients with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia and COVID-19 pneumonia. *IQR, interquartile ranges (IQRs). P value: 102 Legionella pneumophila pneumonia versus 956 COVID-19 pneumonia.

Differences between two age- and gender-matched CAP groups

Background, clinical symptoms, and laboratory findings in patients with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia and age- and gender-matched patients with COVID-19 pneumonia are shown in Table 3 . Dyspnea, sputum production, and psychosis were observed more frequently and cough was observed less frequently in patients with L. pneumophila CAP than those with COVID-19 CAP. The median CRP, LDH, and Na levels were identical between the age- and gender-matched patients and non-matched patients with COVID-19 CAP. The median Legionella Score was still 2 (IQR 1–3) in the age- and gender-matched patients with COVID-19 CAP.
Table 3

Background, clinical symptoms and laboratory findings in patients with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia and age- and gender-matched COVID-19 pneumonia.

VariablesLegionella pneumophilaCOVID-19p-value
No. of patients102102
Median age (IQR), years67 (55–70)67 (55–70)>0.999
No. of males/females90/1290/12>0.999
No. (%) of patients with comorbid illnesses
 Chronic lung disease23 (22.5)13 (12.7)0.097
 Diabetes mellitus20 (19.6)21 (20.6)>0.999
 Chronic heart disease7 (6.9)8 (7.8)>0.999
 Chronic renal disease6 (5.9)8 (7.8)0.783
 Cerebrovascular disease6 (5.9)8 (7.8)0.783
 Chronic liver disease4 (3.9)4 (3.9)>0.999
 Neoplastic disease2 (2.0)5 (4.9)0.445
 Autoimmune disease2 (2.0)3 (2.9)>0.999
No. (%) of patients with the following clinical signs and symptoms
 Dyspnea63 (61.8)29 (28.4)<0.001
 Sputum production51 (50.0)13 (12.7)<0.001
 Cough41 (40.2)59 (57.8)0.017
 Psychiatric symptoms38 (37.3)2 (2.0)<0.001
 Gastrointestinal symptoms14 (13.7)13 (12.7)>0.999
 Headache12 (11.8)10 (9.8)0.822
 Chest pain8 (7.8)2 (2.0)0.101
 Loss of taste014 (13.7)<0.001
 Anosmia012 (11.8)<0.001
Laboratory findings, median (IQR)
 White blood cell count,/μL11,300 (9200–14,100)5300 (4400–7100)<0.001
 C-reactive protein, mg/dL27.1 (22.3–33.1)3.6 (1.3–7.7)<0.001
 Aspartate aminotransferase, U/L62 (37–128)38 (26–61)<0.001
 Alanine aminotransferase, U/L47 (28–82)26 (18–42)<0.001
 Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L)326 (249–441)259 (196–385)<0.001
 Sodium (mmol/L)133 (131–138)136 (134–139)<0.001
No. (%) of patients with each pneumonia severity score
 Mild to moderate (0–2 points)79 (77.5)84 (82.4)0.485
 Severe (3 points)20 (19.6)15 (14.7)0.458
 Extremely severe (4 or 5 points)3 (2.9)3 (2.9)>0.999

*IQRs, interquartile ranges (IQRs).

Background, clinical symptoms and laboratory findings in patients with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia and age- and gender-matched COVID-19 pneumonia. *IQRs, interquartile ranges (IQRs).

Differences between non-severe and severe COVID-19 CAP groups

To clarify the usefulness of Legionella Score among the pneumonia severity, we analyzed patients with COVID-19 pneumonia between non-severe (A-DROP 0, 1, or 2 points) and severe (A-DROP 3, 4, or 5 points) groups (Table 4 ). The median age was significantly higher in patients with severe group than those with non-severe group. Among comorbid illnesses, the frequency of diabetes mellitus, chronic heart disease, and cerebrovascular disease were significantly higher in patients with severe group than those with non-severe group.
Table 4

Background, clinical symptoms and laboratory findings in patients with non-severe and severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

VariablesNon-severeSeverep-value
No. of patients86591
Median age (IQR), years53 (40–67)73 (77–80)<0.001
No. of males/females534/33165/260.087
No. (%) of patients with comorbid illnesses
 Chronic lung disease95 (11.0)12 (13.2)0.488
 Diabetes mellitus133 (15.4)34 (37.4)<0.001
 Chronic heart disease31 (3.6)14 (15.4)<0.001
 Chronic renal disease23 (2.7)5 (5.5)0.177
 Cerebrovascular disease19 (2.2)7 (7.7)0.008
 Chronic liver disease23 (2.7)1 (1.1)0.720
 Neoplastic disease25 (2.9)5 (5.5)0.196
 Autoimmune disease21 (2.4)2 (2.2)>0.999
No. (%) of patients with the following clinical signs and symptoms
 Dyspnea251 (29.0)42 (46.2)0.001
 Sputum production114 (13.2)12 (13.2)>0.999
 Cough564 (65.2)40 (44.0)<0.001
 Psychiatric symptoms16 (1.8)2 (2.2)0.686
 Gastrointestinal symptoms96 (11.1)8 (8.8)0.598
 Headache115 (13.3)6 (6.6)0.167
 Chest pain27 (3.1)00.101
 Loss of taste180 (20.8)4 (4.4)<0.001
 Anosmia163 (18.8)4 (4.4)<0.001
Laboratory findings, median (IQR)
 White blood cell count,/μL5100 (4200–6500)6500 (4950–8250)0.239
 C-reactive protein, mg/dL4.0 (1.5–8.4)10.0 (5.4–14.5)0.007
 Aspartate aminotransferase, U/L33 (23–50)49 (37–73)<0.001
 Alanine aminotransferase, U/L26 (18–43)31 (20–48)0.085
 Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L)257 (198–384)409 (322–530)<0.001
 Sodium (mmol/L)136 (135–139)137 (134–140)0.582

*IQRs, interquartile ranges (IQRs).

Background, clinical symptoms and laboratory findings in patients with non-severe and severe COVID-19 pneumonia. *IQRs, interquartile ranges (IQRs). Cough, loss of taste, and anosmia were observed more frequently and dyspnea was observed less frequently in patients with non-severe group than those with severe group. The median CRP and LDH levels in the severe group were significantly higher than in the non-severe group. Na level were identical between the two groups. The median Legionella Score was significantly higher in the severe group with 3 (IQR 2–3) than the non-severe group with 2 (IQR 1–3) (Table 5 ).
Table 5

Legionella score in patients with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia and COVID-19 pneumonia.

VariablesLegionella pneumophilaCOVID-19
p-valueLegionella vs non-severe COVID-19p-valueLegionella vs severe COVID-19
Non-severeSevereTotal
No. of patients10286591956
Legionella score
 Score 001070107
 Score 102474251
 Score 2427633309
 Score 31014533178
 Score 437711485
 Score 53718624
 Score 614112
 Median (IQR)4 (4–5)2 (1–3)3 (2–3)2 (1–3)<0.0010.022

*IQR, interquartile ranges (IQRs).

Legionella score in patients with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia and COVID-19 pneumonia. *IQR, interquartile ranges (IQRs).

Discussion

The JRS CAP guidelines have been recommended as a rapid and simple scoring system based on clinical and laboratory findings for the presumptive diagnosis of atypical pneumonia [14]. However, our former study indicated that the JRS scoring system is not useful for predicting Legionella pneumonia [5]. Thus, the JSC developed a simple scoring system, the Legionella Score, using six parameters for the presumptive diagnosis of L. pneumophila pneumonia [12]. In the development cohort, the median Legionella Score was significantly higher in the L. pneumophila pneumonia group than the non-L. pneumophila pneumonia group with median score 4 in the Legionella CAP group, score 2 in the S. pneumoniae CAP group, and score 1 in the M. pneumoniae CAP group [5]. Subsequently, the Legionella Score was validated in an independent cohort and confirmed that Legionella Score was a useful tool for the presumptive diagnosis of L. pneumophila pneumonia [12]. In the present study, the median Legionella Score was significantly higher in the L. pneumophila CAP group than the COVID-19 CAP group (score 4 vs 2, p < 0.001). In the age- and gender-matched COVID-19 CAP group, the median Legionella Score was identical at 2 (IQR 1–3) as in the non-matched COVID-19 CAP group. In addition, the median Legionella Score was significantly higher in the L. pneumophila CAP group than the COVID-19 CAP group regardless of pneumonia severity. In contrast, the presence of loss of taste and/or anosmia was specific to the COVID-19 CAP group. Being male, with dyspnea, and absence of cough were identified as independent predictors of L. pneumophila CAP in the former cohorts [5,12]. These parameters were confirmed as independent predictors of Legionella CAP in other surveillance in Japan [15], but not identified in other countries [[7], [8], [9], [10], [11]]. In Japan, outbreaks due to L. pneumophila have been reported regularly in hot spring facilities, bathing facilities, or public bathhouses. In addition, outbreaks have been connected with the use of humidifiers contaminated with L. pneumophila. Thus, traditional bathing culture in Japan may be linked to these parameters. In conclusion, our results demonstrated that L. pneumophila CAP was clearly different from COVID-19 CAP. Dyspnea and psychiatric symptoms were more frequently observed and cough was less frequently observed in patients with L. pneumophila CAP than those with COVID-19 CAP. CRP and LDH levels were markedly elevated and Na level was significantly lower in patients with L. pneumophila CAP. Thus, the Legionella Score shown to have good diagnostic ability during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, physicians should consider COVID-19 CAP when loss of taste and/or anosmia are observed regardless of the Legionella Score.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The data will not be shared because of participant confidentiality.

Author's contributions

All the authors conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination, and collected and managed the data, including quality control. NM drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee at Kansai Medical University and all participating facilities. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  14 in total

1.  Clinical diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia revisited: evaluation of the Community-Based Pneumonia Incidence Study Group scoring system.

Authors:  Núria Fernández-Sabé; Beatriz Rosón; Jordi Carratalà; Jordi Dorca; Frederic Manresa; Francesc Gudiol
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-07-28       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults, revised edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.424

Review 3.  Systematic review and metaanalysis: urinary antigen tests for Legionellosis.

Authors:  Toshihiko Shimada; Yoshinori Noguchi; Jeffrey L Jackson; Jun Miyashita; Yasuaki Hayashino; Toru Kamiya; Shin Yamazaki; Tadashi Matsumura; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  Legionellosis.

Authors:  J E Stout; V L Yu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-09-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Clinical presentation of Legionella pneumonia: Evaluation of clinical scoring systems and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  Naoyuki Miyashita; Futoshi Higa; Yosuke Aoki; Toshiaki Kikuchi; Masafumi Seki; Kazuhiro Tateda; Nobuko Maki; Kazuhiro Uchino; Kazuhiko Ogasawara; Hiroshi Kiyota; Akira Watanabe
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 2.211

6.  Ruling out Legionella in community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Sebastian Haubitz; Fabienne Hitz; Lena Graedel; Marcus Batschwaroff; Timothy Lee Wiemken; Paula Peyrani; Julio A Ramirez; Christoph Andreas Fux; Beat Mueller; Philipp Schuetz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Etiology and factors contributing to the severity and mortality of community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Takashi Ishiguro; Noboru Takayanagi; Shozaburo Yamaguchi; Hideaki Yamakawa; Keitaro Nakamoto; Yotaro Takaku; Yosuke Miyahara; Naho Kagiyama; Kazuyoshi Kurashima; Tsutomu Yanagisawa; Yutaka Sugita
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.271

Review 8.  Clinical features of legionnaires' disease.

Authors:  B A Cunha
Journal:  Semin Respir Infect       Date:  1998-06

9.  Clinical predictors for Legionella in patients presenting with community-acquired pneumonia to the emergency department.

Authors:  Rico Fiumefreddo; Roya Zaborsky; Jeannine Haeuptle; Mirjam Christ-Crain; Andrej Trampuz; Ingrid Steffen; Reno Frei; Beat Müller; Philipp Schuetz
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 3.317

10.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.

Authors:  Na Zhu; Dingyu Zhang; Wenling Wang; Xingwang Li; Bo Yang; Jingdong Song; Xiang Zhao; Baoying Huang; Weifeng Shi; Roujian Lu; Peihua Niu; Faxian Zhan; Xuejun Ma; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Guizhen Wu; George F Gao; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.