Literature DB >> 3581674

Barium radiology: a sensitive test for gastro-oesophageal reflux.

R J Sellar, J S De Caestecker, R C Heading.   

Abstract

Fifty patients, 19 with heartburn and 31 with noncardiac chest pain were studied using radiology, endoscopy and 24h ambulatory intraoesophageal pH monitoring. Barium radiology was performed using a 'physiological' method and a 'compression' method to induce reflux. Double contrast oesophograms were also obtained. Thirty-four patients had significant acid reflux detected by a pH probe. Using this as a standard, the 'physiological' method detected 17, the 'compression' method 24 and endoscopy 17 patients with reflux, with two, four and one false positives respectively. Compression barium was the most sensitive (71%) and accurate (72%), while endoscopy was the most specific (94%) but least accurate (64%) in detecting patients with acid reflux. Using a double contrast barium technique, measurement of the internal diameter of the cardiac oesophagus (more than 25 mm abnormal) had a sensitivity of 74%, specificity 86% and accuracy 78% in detecting patients with acid reflux. When the results of the compression method and measurement of internal diameter were combined, sensitivity was 87%, specificity 69% and accuracy 81%. These results suggest that, by combining a test to provoke reflux with a double-contrast technique to measure the internal diameter of the cardiac oesophagus, barium radiology becomes a sensitive screening test for reflux.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3581674     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(87)80077-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  5 in total

1.  Barium study associated with water siphon test in gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications.

Authors:  E Fiorentino; F Barbiera; D Cabibi; G Pantuso; S Bonventre; A Aiello; S Latteri; T D'Agostino
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Long-term risk of atrial fibrillation with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophagitis.

Authors:  T Jared Bunch; Douglas L Packer; Arshad Jahangir; G Richard Locke; Nicholas J Talley; Bernard J Gersh; Ranjini R Roy; David O Hodge; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 3.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease in 2006. The imperfect diagnosis.

Authors:  John T Boyle
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09

4.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease: medical or surgical treatment?

Authors:  Theodore Liakakos; George Karamanolis; Paul Patapis; Evangelos P Misiakos
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  A Deep Learning Model for Classification of Endoscopic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Chi-Chih Wang; Yu-Ching Chiu; Wei-Liang Chen; Tzu-Wei Yang; Ming-Chang Tsai; Ming-Hseng Tseng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.