Atomically engineered artificial lattices are a useful tool for simulating complex quantum phenomena, but have so far been limited to the study of Hamiltonians where electron-electron interactions do not play a role. However, it is precisely the regime in which these interactions do matter where computational times lend simulations a critical advantage over numerical methods. Here, we propose a platform for constructing artificial matter that relies on the confinement of field-emission resonances, a class of vacuum-localized discretized electronic states. We use atom manipulation of surface vacancies in a chlorine-terminated Cu(100) surface to reveal square patches of the underlying metal, thereby creating atomically precise potential wells that host particle-in-a-box modes. By adjusting the dimensions of the confining potential, we can access states with different quantum numbers, making these patches attractive candidates as quantum dots or artificial atoms. We demonstrate that the lifetime of electrons in these engineered states can be extended and tuned through modification of the confining potential, either via atomic assembly or by changing the tip-sample distance. We also demonstrate control over a finite range of state filling, a parameter which plays a key role in the evolution of quantum many-body states. We model the transport through the localized state to disentangle and quantify the lifetime-limiting processes, illustrating the critical dependence of the electron lifetime on the properties of the underlying bulk band structure. The interplay with the bulk bands gives rise to negative differential resistance, leading to possible applications in engineering custom atomic-scale resonant tunnelling diodes, which exhibit similar current-voltage characteristics.
Atomically engineered artificial lattices are a useful tool for simulating complex quantum phenomena, but have so far been limited to the study of Hamiltonians where electron-electron interactions do not play a role. However, it is precisely the regime in which these interactions do matter where computational times lend simulations a critical advantage over numerical methods. Here, we propose a platform for constructing artificial matter that relies on the confinement of field-emission resonances, a class of vacuum-localized discretized electronic states. We use atom manipulation of surface vacancies in a chlorine-terminated Cu(100) surface to reveal square patches of the underlying metal, thereby creating atomically precise potential wells that host particle-in-a-box modes. By adjusting the dimensions of the confining potential, we can access states with different quantum numbers, making these patches attractive candidates as quantum dots or artificial atoms. We demonstrate that the lifetime of electrons in these engineered states can be extended and tuned through modification of the confining potential, either via atomic assembly or by changing the tip-sample distance. We also demonstrate control over a finite range of state filling, a parameter which plays a key role in the evolution of quantum many-body states. We model the transport through the localized state to disentangle and quantify the lifetime-limiting processes, illustrating the critical dependence of the electron lifetime on the properties of the underlying bulk band structure. The interplay with the bulk bands gives rise to negative differential resistance, leading to possible applications in engineering custom atomic-scale resonant tunnelling diodes, which exhibit similar current-voltage characteristics.
Artificial lattices serve as
quantum simulators for realizing and studying fundamental properties
of real materials, with the advantage that the relevant interactions
can be precisely controlled. While different experimental approaches,
such as using ultracold atoms,[1] optical
lattices,[2,3] or trapped ions,[4] have been successfully implemented in the study of artificially
constructed systems, atom manipulation casts scanning tunneling microscopy
(STM) as a particularly appealing platform: The scanning probe framework
allows for creating and characterizing the electronic properties of
2D artificial matter on the atomic scale.[5] Typically, atomic impurities are patterned to construct a potential
landscape that mimics a specific physical system, with the aim of
studying model Hamiltonians. This approach has led to the realization
of a wide range of quantum states in, for instance, Dirac materials
like the Lieb lattice[6,7] and artificial graphene,[8,9] as well as higher order topological insulators,[10,11] among others.[12−16] These studies offer rare insight into the parameters that govern
the electronic behavior of these systems, but they are restricted
by the short electron lifetime of the constituent artificial atoms
to the limiting case in which electron–electron interactions
do not play a role. Additionally, short electron lifetimes limit the
available energy resolution; the most popular STM approach so far,
which relies on confining surface states, lacks flexibility in tuning
this parameter.[17−19]Here, we explore a platform for realizing artificial
lattices,
based on confining field-emission resonances (FERs): a class of quantized
electronic states localized in the vacuum, between the surface and
the probe tip, that arise in the high bias regime, i.e., exceeding
the sample work function. We show that confining potentials can be
engineered to enable the study of states with different orbital character,[9,20,21] with precise control over the
energy and quantum numbers of the states. We study the electron lifetime
of these states, and demonstrate that we can finely tune it, and consequently,
to some extent, the average occupation, by adjusting the tip height
or patch dimensions. The ability to tune the lifetime and occupation
of artificial atoms is a prerequisite for simulating many-body quantum
states driven by electron–electron interactions. We also observe
specific voltage–current characteristics, namely, negative
differential resistance, which are analogous to those of resonant
tunneling diodes,[22] making the confined
FERs also suitable to possible applications in creating customizable,
atomic-scale diodes.
Results and Discussion
We use atom manipulation of
single vacancies in the chlorine-terminated
Cu(100) surface to engineer lateral confinement of field emission
resonances. By coordinating chlorine vacancies, which are easily manipulable
and thus suited to large scale atomic assembly,[6,13−15,23] adjacent to each other,
we construct patches of exposed copper, surrounded by areas of homogeneous,
monolayer chlorine coverage (Figure a). As shown in Figure c, the bare and chlorinated Cu(100) surfaces host FERs
at bias voltages exceeding the local work function, at 4.6 V[24] and 5.7 V,[25] respectively.
Although these spectra are obtained at slightly different current
set points, we can expect this discrepancy to have a minor effect
in the observed spectroscopic features.[26]
Figure 1
Confinement
of field-emission resonances. (a) STM constant-current
topography (600 mV, 300 pA) of square, atomically assembled patches
of Cl vacancies, with sizes indicated in unit cells. (b) Potential
landscape (blue) between sample (left) and tip (right) for a finite
bias voltage V. Among the wave functions (gray) calculated
for this potential are the first three field-emission resonances (red).
Inset: schematic of the tip–sample junction. (c) Constant-current
differential conductance spectra acquired for bare Cu(100) (blue,
250 pA), the chlorine monolayer (orange, 100 pA), and the center of
the 7 × 7 patch (black, 100 pA). The first peak on the chlorine
monolayer (3.5 V), being below the surface work function, corresponds
to an image-potential state. (d) Stacked constant-current (100 pA)
differential conductance spectra taken along a line crossing the center
of each patch (shown in inset), with the corresponding patch size
indicated (top). A correction is applied to the data to rectify the
asymmetry of the tip electric field (see Figure S5). White lines indicate the patch boundaries. (e) Calculated
LDOS of the particle-in-a-box states (|Ψ|2), obtained
using a finite well model (top row). Normalized[38] constant-current (100 pA) differential conductance maps
acquired for the 7 × 7 patch at the resonance energies of the
first principal FER (n = 1, (n, n) = (1,1)) and the following subresonances.
White squares delineate the spatial extent of the simulated potential
well (top row) and the physical patch (bottom row).
Confinement
of field-emission resonances. (a) STM constant-current
topography (600 mV, 300 pA) of square, atomically assembled patches
of Cl vacancies, with sizes indicated in unit cells. (b) Potential
landscape (blue) between sample (left) and tip (right) for a finite
bias voltage V. Among the wave functions (gray) calculated
for this potential are the first three field-emission resonances (red).
Inset: schematic of the tip–sample junction. (c) Constant-current
differential conductance spectra acquired for bare Cu(100) (blue,
250 pA), the chlorine monolayer (orange, 100 pA), and the center of
the 7 × 7 patch (black, 100 pA). The first peak on the chlorine
monolayer (3.5 V), being below the surface work function, corresponds
to an image-potential state. (d) Stacked constant-current (100 pA)
differential conductance spectra taken along a line crossing the center
of each patch (shown in inset), with the corresponding patch size
indicated (top). A correction is applied to the data to rectify the
asymmetry of the tip electric field (see Figure S5). White lines indicate the patch boundaries. (e) Calculated
LDOS of the particle-in-a-box states (|Ψ|2), obtained
using a finite well model (top row). Normalized[38] constant-current (100 pA) differential conductance maps
acquired for the 7 × 7 patch at the resonance energies of the
first principal FER (n = 1, (n, n) = (1,1)) and the following subresonances.
White squares delineate the spatial extent of the simulated potential
well (top row) and the physical patch (bottom row).These resonances can be readily modeled with a
one-dimensional
potential in the out-of-plane direction (Figures and S4). The
work function difference between the two surfaces results in a shift
in the measured resonance energies (Figure c), in accordance with previous studies.[27−30]Spectroscopy acquired at the center of the 7 × 7 patch
(dimensions
defined in unit cells of the chlorine lattice) exhibits additional
resonances, in comparison to the bare and chlorinated Cu(100) surfaces
(Figure c). As shown
in Figure d, these
additional resonances belong to a series of subresonances following
each primary FER and can in fact be resolved for each primary FER,
up to and including the fourth primary resonance. We use the principal
quantum number n to
describe the primary FERs. The additional modes are only observed
above the energy of the first resonance on bare Cu(100) (Figure c). The full in-plane
structure of the confined modes for the larger patches is best visualized
by differential conductance maps taken at voltages corresponding to
the subresonances of the first FER on the 7 × 7 patch, as shown
in Figure e. The observed
states can be recognized as two-dimensional particle-in-a-box modes,
with quantum numbers n and n, and can be
accurately reproduced by the eigenstates of a finite potential well
(see Figure S3). Similar to previous works,[21] the nodal patterns of the first three modes
are analogous to the orbitals of a two-dimensional atom, with the
first state corresponding to the s-like state and the second to the
p-like and subsequently the d-like state. Finally, we note that the
energy of the FERs depends on the patch size: As the patch size is
increased, the FER energy shifts down, tending toward the limit of
bare Cu(100). All in all, the assembled patches can be seen as atomically
precise potential wells, wherein the energy, spacing, and order of
the states can be tuned by adjusting the shape and size of the confining
potential. We note that the single vacancy[6,13−15] stands out as an exception, as the finite screening
length prohibits the necessary change in the local work function on
such small length-scales: As such, the vacancy acts as a scattering
center, rather than a confinement potential.In order to characterize
the electron lifetime, we consider the
transport through these confined states: Two electron baths, one on
the tip side and another on the sample side, act as decoherent sources,
the contributions of which we can disentangle by investigating the
evolution of the differential conductance spectra as a function of
conductance set point, as shown in Figure a. With increasing conductance set point,
we observe a slight shift in the energy of the FERs, which is explained
by the increased out-of-plane confinement (Figure b), as well as the appearance of negative
differential resistance (NDR). The appearance of NDR at high conductance
set points gives us qualitative insight into the coupling of the resonances
with the substrate and tip.
Figure 2
Extracting tip and sample decay rates. (a) Constant-height
differential
conductance spectra obtained at the center of the 5 × 5 patch
for a range of conductance set points ((250 pA → 32 nA), 6.2
V, corresponding to a ∼0.3 nm change in tip–sample distance).
Inset: schematic of the double-barrier potential (dotted line) implemented
in the rate equations, with the indicated decay rates to the tip and
sample, Γ and Γ. (b) Inset: constant-height differential conductance
(light blue, shaded) acquired at the center of the 5 × 5 patch
(32 nA, 6.2 V). Calculated d I/dV using a resonant tunneling model for a single level (black, dotted
line) or several, independent levels (brown, solid line). (b, c) Sample
(b, yellow circles) and tip (c, green circles) decay rates extracted
for the first principal resonance as a function of conductance set
point, fit (solid gray line) to an inverse natural logarithm and a
line, respectively. The tip decay rate is evaluated at the energy
of the peak of the first principal field emission resonance. (c) Average
occupation versus conductance set point (orange circles) and the corresponding
linear fit (solid gray line).
Extracting tip and sample decay rates. (a) Constant-height
differential
conductance spectra obtained at the center of the 5 × 5 patch
for a range of conductance set points ((250 pA → 32 nA), 6.2
V, corresponding to a ∼0.3 nm change in tip–sample distance).
Inset: schematic of the double-barrier potential (dotted line) implemented
in the rate equations, with the indicated decay rates to the tip and
sample, Γ and Γ. (b) Inset: constant-height differential conductance
(light blue, shaded) acquired at the center of the 5 × 5 patch
(32 nA, 6.2 V). Calculated d I/dV using a resonant tunneling model for a single level (black, dotted
line) or several, independent levels (brown, solid line). (b, c) Sample
(b, yellow circles) and tip (c, green circles) decay rates extracted
for the first principal resonance as a function of conductance set
point, fit (solid gray line) to an inverse natural logarithm and a
line, respectively. The tip decay rate is evaluated at the energy
of the peak of the first principal field emission resonance. (c) Average
occupation versus conductance set point (orange circles) and the corresponding
linear fit (solid gray line).We consider a transport model describing the resonant
tunneling
of independent electrons from (to) the tip and sample through a level
localized between the two potential barriers (Figure a, inset, and Supporting Information section 1). In this framework, the current through
a single resonance is given bywhere the quantum of conductance is G = e2/(πℏ), Γ and Γ are, respectively, the tip and sample decay rates
for the i-th resonance, and E is its energy, whose shift with bias voltage
we will initially neglect for simplicity. In general, the tip and
sample decay rates are both distance and voltage dependent. For the
former, this dependence is derived by considering the transmission
through the tunnel barrier. The sample decay rate, however, encapsulates
an effective barrier that depends on the surface band structure, and
the relationship between Γ and V is nontrivial. We approximate this dependence as either
constant or linear, depending on the width of the voltage window we
consider. The differential conductance, in turn, can be obtained by
differentiating the current with respect to voltage, and contains
terms that scale with the derivatives of the decay rates and the energy
of the resonance (see Supporting Information equation S10 for the full expression).We can gain quantitative
insight into the tip and sample decay
rates by focusing strictly on the first principal FER (Figure b, inset): This allows us to
drastically reduce the number of free variables to a single resonance,
and consequently to meaningfully account for the effects of the changing
level E0; additionally, we simplify Γ(V) to a constant in the narrow
voltage range around the resonance. By fitting the measured differential
conductance at each conductance set point to our model, we can extract
a value for the tip and sample decay rates as a function of conductance
set point (Figure b, c).In Figure b, we
see that Γ increases with the conductance
set point, which can be related to the FER wave function: In general,
decay to the bulk is governed by the overlap of the vacuum-localized
state to the substrate, which is in turn determined via the penetration
of the state into the bulk, the evanescent tail of the bulk states
into the vacuum, and the diminished electronic screening in the area
between the surface and the vacuum.[31,32] Bringing the
tip closer causes a redistribution of the weight of the wave function
toward the surface, rendering the scattering channels to the bulk
more efficient[33] and leading to an increase
in Γ. More precisely, we consider
that the sample decay rate should scale linearly with the wave function
overlap of the FER with the sample,[31] and
for simplicity, we assume its increase to be inversely proportional
to the tip–sample distance. Given the exponential dependence
of current with distance, we thus expect an inverse logarithmic dependence
of the sample decay rate on the conductance set point. The fit in Figure b shows that this
simple relation appropriately describes the change in Γ.The evolution of the tip decay rate
with conductance set point
is straightforward: This rate should scale exponentially with the
tip–sample distance, meaning it should be linear with the conductance
set point and intercept with the origin, as we see in Figure c. Importantly, the changes
in the decay rates impact the overall occupation of the state. The
occupation is determined by the ratio of the tip decay rate to total
decay rate Γ + Γ, meaning that the occupation of the state can be
tuned via the tip-height, as shown in Figure c: The occupation linearly increases with
the conductance set point. In effect, this means that the competing
factors determining the time-average occupation, the rate of tunneling
electrons versus the increase in the lifetime-limiting rate, Γ, result in the state filling increasing as
the tip is brought closer.We now extend our scope to account
for transport through the higher
energy states, around 5.6 V (n = 1, (n, n) = (2, 1), (1, 2)) and 6
V ((3, 1), (1, 3)), respectively. To do so, we assume the resonances
are independent, i.e., that the total current is determined by the
sum of the currents I through each resonance; additionally, we explicitly account for
the voltage-dependence of Γ(V) as linear to first approximation. As seen in Figure b (inset), our model
successfully reproduces the key features of the measured differential
conductance over the entire voltage range, with, in particular, the
presence of NDR between ∼5.6 and 6 V. In this window, we find
dΓ/dV < 0.
In fact, we find it is necessary to have a decreasing sample decay
rate with increasing voltage to engender NDR, indicating once again
that the decay path to the sample crucially depends on the electronic
wave function of the FER.While the decay rates can be tuned
by changing the out-of-plane
confinement of the wave function, the in-plane confinement plays the
dominant role in setting an upper bound on the lifetime. Typically,
field-emission resonances are delocalized (Bloch-like) in the directions
parallel to the surface and thus form bands.[26] In that case, the electron lifetime is affected by interband scattering,
wherein the excited electron escapes into the metal (sample or tip),
or scatters with an electron in a different band, and intraband scattering,
in which case the electron changes velocity.[31,34] We can expect the introduction of lateral localization to affect
decay through these channels in two opposing ways: The increased confinement
causes the bands to split into quantized states, strongly attenuating
intraband decay, while the simultaneous broadening of the k-space distribution increases the available interband decay
paths to the bulk. We assess the degree to which the in-plane confinement
precisely affects the lifetime by investigating the transport characteristics
of different sized patches.Carrying out the same conductance-dependent
measurements (see Figure S6), we see a
marked change in the relative
strength of the NDR based on the dimensions of the confining patch,
as shown in Figure a. The relative NDR strength, which we define as the ratio of negative
area to the total area under the differential conductance spectrum,
stays fairly constant as a function of conductance set point for patches
of larger size, such as the 7 × 7 and 5 × 5. In contrast,
the smallest patch (2 × 2) does not exhibit any NDR at low conductance
set points; at a conductance set point of ∼0.5 nS, the relative
NDR strength becomes nonzero and monotonically increases thereafter.
The same general trend holds for the 3 × 3: exponentially increasing
NDR strength with increasing conductance set point. In fact, the NDR
is directly related to the change in the sample decay rate as a function
of voltage, and we can see this variance in Γ in the strength and conductance-dependent behavior of the
NDR for the different patches.
Figure 3
Tuning of the lifetime. (a) Relative strength
of the negative differential
resistance as a function of conductance set point for patches of various
size. Colors correspond to illustration in the inset. Dotted lines
are guides to the eye. (b) Conductance-dependence of the sample decay
rate for corresponding patch sizes fit to an inverse natural logarithmic
function (gray solid lines). (c) Extrapolated value of the sample
decay rate for zero set point conductance (blue circles) and the corresponding
lifetime (green circles) for each patch size. Dotted lines are guides
to eye.
Tuning of the lifetime. (a) Relative strength
of the negative differential
resistance as a function of conductance set point for patches of various
size. Colors correspond to illustration in the inset. Dotted lines
are guides to the eye. (b) Conductance-dependence of the sample decay
rate for corresponding patch sizes fit to an inverse natural logarithmic
function (gray solid lines). (c) Extrapolated value of the sample
decay rate for zero set point conductance (blue circles) and the corresponding
lifetime (green circles) for each patch size. Dotted lines are guides
to eye.As before, to quantify the change in the sample
decay rate, we
extract Γ by fitting eq to the first principal FER of each
patch for a discrete range of conductance set points (Figure b). We see that both the magnitude
of the sample decay rate, and its rate of change over this conductance
set point range, vary according to patch size. The electrons localized
above the smallest patch experience the largest sample decay rates,
meaning that scattering to the bulk becomes more efficient due to
the increased spatial confinement.The lifetime of these localized
electrons, τ, is determined
by the tip and sample decay rates, such that τ–1 = Γ–1 + Γ–1. The tip contribution
exponentially tends to zero as a function of the tip–sample
distance, meaning the intrinsic lifetime (at zero conductance set
point, namely, when the tip is infinitely far away) is determined
by the sample decay rate at zero conductance. Approximating the lifetime
by the line width of the resonance is not valid here, as the potential
in the out-of-plane direction changes as we carry out spectroscopy,
leading to a changing resonance energy as a function of the applied
voltage that artificially broadens the peak.As shown in Figure c, the extracted
lifetimes monotonically increase as a function of
patch size up to N = 7, the maximum patch dimension
studied in this work. Notably, the lifetime for the confined states
is roughly 2–4 times longer than the lifetime of the first
resonance on bare Cu(100), extracted using the same method and in
fair agreement with previously reported values (see Figure S2). This also indicates that there must be a patch
size with an optimally long lifetime, after which τ begins decreasing
with patch size, tending toward the freely propagating Cu(100) limit.
Indeed, the degree to which the confinement prohibits the different
decay paths at play is ultimately a delicate balance: The smaller
the patch, the fewer states available for scattering between different
resonances but the larger the k-space overlap with
the bulk states. Notably, the lifetime-limiting rate for all the patches
shown here is Γ, which in our case
is approximately 3 orders of magnitude larger than the tip decay rate
Γ (Figure c).To better determine the role of
the in- and out-of-plane confinement
on the lifetime, we investigate the spectral weight of the localized
resonances in the k-space and compare this to the
bulk band structure of copper. We calculate the wave function Ψ,
which we assume to be separable, in the directions parallel and perpendicular
to the (100) direction to obtain the corresponding k-space distribution. First, we consider the out-of-plane direction,
where the confinement is set by the tip–sample distance and
the applied voltage. We restrict our focus to the calculated wave
function, Ψ(z), for the first principal FER
and the resulting Fourier transform, Ψ(k⊥), shown in Figure a. The k⊥ values
with a significant spectral weight span the entirety of the first
Brillouin zone (BZ) (±1.75 Å).
Figure 4
Distribution in k-space. (a) Calculated out-of-plane
component of the real space wave function |ψ(z)| for the first principal FER n = 0 (left) and the corresponding Fourier transform (right)
at a tip–sample distance z = 2.4 nm. (b, c)
Calculated in-plane component of the real space wave function (left)
for the (b) 3 × 3 and (c) 7 × 7 patches, showing the first
(n, n) = (1, 1) ((b) red; (c) pink) and second
(1, 2), (2, 1) ((c), purple) modes, with the corresponding Fourier
transforms (right). Dotted lines indicate ± π/a bounds. (d) Bulk band structure of Cu along high-symmetry lines,
with the experimental resonance energy of the (1, 1) state for the
3 × 3 (red) and 7 × 7 (pink), as well as the (1, 2)/(2,
1) state of the latter (purple), denoted by solid lines. Inset: schematic
of the first Brillouin zone of Cu. (e, f) Intensity of the 3 ×
3 wave function in k-space across Brillouin zone
slices indicated in inset of (d). Solid contour lines delineate an
order of magnitude change in the intensity. Corresponding DFT-calculated
constant-energy isolines shown for bulk Cu bands, taken 5 V (black
line) and 6 V (red line) above the Fermi level. (g) Calculated sample
decay rate as a function of bias voltage, shown for the first three
resonances probed in the center of a 5 × 5 patch, corresponding
to the (1, 1) (mauve line), (2, 1)/(1, 2) (brown line), and (3, 1)/(1,
3) (gray line) modes. The shaded areas correspond to the voltage range
in which the respective modes are typically measured, delineating
Γ in that range.
Distribution in k-space. (a) Calculated out-of-plane
component of the real space wave function |ψ(z)| for the first principal FER n = 0 (left) and the corresponding Fourier transform (right)
at a tip–sample distance z = 2.4 nm. (b, c)
Calculated in-plane component of the real space wave function (left)
for the (b) 3 × 3 and (c) 7 × 7 patches, showing the first
(n, n) = (1, 1) ((b) red; (c) pink) and second
(1, 2), (2, 1) ((c), purple) modes, with the corresponding Fourier
transforms (right). Dotted lines indicate ± π/a bounds. (d) Bulk band structure of Cu along high-symmetry lines,
with the experimental resonance energy of the (1, 1) state for the
3 × 3 (red) and 7 × 7 (pink), as well as the (1, 2)/(2,
1) state of the latter (purple), denoted by solid lines. Inset: schematic
of the first Brillouin zone of Cu. (e, f) Intensity of the 3 ×
3 wave function in k-space across Brillouin zone
slices indicated in inset of (d). Solid contour lines delineate an
order of magnitude change in the intensity. Corresponding DFT-calculated
constant-energy isolines shown for bulk Cu bands, taken 5 V (black
line) and 6 V (red line) above the Fermi level. (g) Calculated sample
decay rate as a function of bias voltage, shown for the first three
resonances probed in the center of a 5 × 5 patch, corresponding
to the (1, 1) (mauve line), (2, 1)/(1, 2) (brown line), and (3, 1)/(1,
3) (gray line) modes. The shaded areas correspond to the voltage range
in which the respective modes are typically measured, delineating
Γ in that range.Along the in-plane directions, we consider the
wave functions Ψ(x) and Ψ(y) corresponding to the
first ((1, 1)) particle-in-a-box mode for the 3 × 3 and 7 ×
7 patches (Figure b, c). As expected, the k∥-space
distribution widens as the patch size decreases. Furthermore, as shown
in Figure c, this
broadening also takes place when the quantum numbers (n, n) of the in-plane mode increase. This is due to changes in
the apparent barrier height: Compare, for instance, the first and
second particle-in-a-box modes. Since the latter lies at higher energy
than the former, it experiences a shallower finite well. Such considerations
allow us to visualize how the factors considered so far, such as the
tip–sample distance, the lateral extent of the patch, and the
apparent height of the in-plane barrier, impact the distribution of
the state in k-space and consequently its overlap
with the bulk states.To better illustrate this, we consider
the band structure of bulk
copper along the high symmetry lines,[35] specifically at the experimental energies of the particle-in-a-box
modes (Figure d).
The lifetime of the confined electrons depends directly on, and is
limited by, the number of bulk states available for direct tunneling:
The more bands we cross at the energy of the resonance, with k-values falling within Ψ(k), the
shorter the lifetime to first-order. In this energy range, we cross
several bulk bands along the high-symmetry lines (X → W, W
→ L, L → Γ, Γ → K); however, the
efficiency of these decay paths is scaled by the spectral weight of
Ψ(k) at the crossing points. In other words,
the efficiency of the decay paths is scaled by the probability of
having an electron with the right momentum for direct tunneling into
that bulk state.Accordingly, in Figure e, f, we consider the intensity of the k-space
wave function along various cross sections of the first BZ (Figure d, inset). Interestingly,
the highest spectral weight is along the Γ → X direction,
across both the lateral (Figure e) and vertical (Figure f) cross sections, relative to the other high-symmetry
lines; however, this direction does not present any band crossing
along the high symmetry lines at the energy of the resonances. In
fact, Ψ(k) carries little, if any, spectral
weight along the other directions where it does cross the bulk bands.
This is illustrated in Figure e, f, where we see that Ψ(k) has practically
zero intensity along the energy isosurfaces (at 5 V and 6 V) of bulk
Cu, calculated using density functional theory (DFT) (see Supporting Information section 5). This is quite
counterintuitive: Although the lateral confinement of the states introduces
direct tunneling paths to the bulk that are not present for the laterally
freely propagating case, we can consider the contribution to be minimal
in this case. Additionally, the added confinement acts to largely
hinder the role of intraband inelastic scattering, as the available
states for scattering are substantially reduced: The FERs no longer
form bands, but rather, they are quantized and well-separated in energy,
according to the physical dimensions of the patch. These two effects
ultimately amount to a considerable enhancement of the lifetime of
the confined states.These considerations also shed light on
the dependence of the sample
decay rate Γ with bias voltage,
which as we previously found is critical in engendering NDR. With
increasing voltage, the localized resonance is pushed to higher energies,
causing a shift in the crossing points with the bulk bands. In turn,
this shift translates into the decay channels being scaled by a slightly
different spectral weight. To illustrate this effect, we can consider
the crossing along the Γ → K direction: As the bias increases,
the FER shifts up in energy, meaning that the crossing point for the
lower band moves away from the Γ point, closer to the K point. Figure e, f shows that this
shift is accompanied by a decrease in the spectral weight of Ψ(k), meaning the total overlap between the localized state
and the bulk bands decreases. The emergence of the upper band around
∼4.5 V, however, further complicates the picture, illustrating
that the overall rate of change of the decay rate is hard to estimate.
However, by qualitatively considering the evolution of the k-space overlap, we can already grasp the complexity of
the dependence of Γ on the bias
voltage.To get a quantitative estimate of the change in the
sample decay
rate, we calculate the weighted k-space wave function
overlap for each DFT-calculated crossing point throughout the entire
BZ, and relate that to a dimensionless sample-decay rate via Fermi’s
golden rule (Figure g, see also Supporting Information section 5). For this, we consider the calculated k-space
wave function of the 5 × 5 patch for the first (1, 1), second
(2, 1), (1, 2), and fourth (3, 1), (1, 3) particle-in-a-box modes,
the only states with nonzero intensity at the center of the patch
(see Figures d and 2a). As shown in Figure g, we see that the calculated sample decay
rate for all three states monotonically decreases, i.e., the overlap
of Ψ(k) with the bulk bands decreases with
increasing voltage so that dΓ/dV is negative; the ratio of this rate of change to the intercept
is in good agreement with our quantitative results from the double-barrier
model (Figure ). The
sample decay rate associated with each state is strictly only applicable
in the voltage range in which that state is measured, roughly delineated
in Figure g by the
shaded areas. All in all, we can confidently attribute the NDR to
the effects of the bulk band structure. Additionally, we should also
note that the NDR is consistently observed with different tips, and
is not observed for laterally propagating FERs (see Figure S2),[36,37] which do not have direct tunneling
paths to the bulk available to them.
Conclusions
By laterally confining field-emission resonances
through atomic
assembly of single chlorine vacancies, we present a platform for creating
artificial atoms. We demonstrate control over the lifetime and occupation
of these artificial atoms by adjusting the confining potential, implemented
via modification of the tip–sample distance or the lateral
dimensions of the patch. The ability to tune the occupation is a key
parameter of control in the study of quantum many-body states that
evolve as a function of the state filling. We show that the lifetime
of field-emission resonances, unlike that of surface states, can be
prolonged via lateral confinement, up to nearly four times the freely
propagating case. This extension of the lifetime enhances the available
energy resolution, and, in conjunction with control over the state
filling, can carry implications for studying electron–electron
interactions with artificial lattices. Further prolonging the lifetime
to approach a state occupation of 1 for reasonable set point currents
can be pursued via several avenues, such as finding an underlying
bulk crystal that hosts FER bands closer to the Fermi energy or one
that is semiconducting or even insulating. These considerations make
confined vacuum resonances a promising platform for creating and studying
artificial lattices.
Methods
Sample preparation and experimentation were
carried out in ultrahigh
vacuum systems with a base pressure of 10–10 mbar
(Unisoku USM1300s, SPECS Joule-Thompson-SPM). The Cu(100) crystal
was cleaned via repeated cycles of argon sputter at 1 kV and annealing
to 600 °C. The chlorinated copper surface was prepared by thermal
evaporation (2–3 min) of anhydrous CuCl2 powder
heated to 300 °C onto a warm Cu(100) crystal. The crystal was
heated to 150 °C for ∼10 min before and after deposition.[23] The coverage and sample quality were verified
via LEED (where possible) and STM. Atom manipulation of chlorine vacancies
was implemented using a procedure previously outlined.[23] Differential conductance measurements were carried
out using standard lock-in detection techniques.
Authors: F E Kalff; M P Rebergen; E Fahrenfort; J Girovsky; R Toskovic; J L Lado; J Fernández-Rossier; A F Otte Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Marlou R Slot; Thomas S Gardenier; Peter H Jacobse; Guido C P van Miert; Sander N Kempkes; Stephan J M Zevenhuizen; Cristiane Morais Smith; Daniel Vanmaekelbergh; Ingmar Swart Journal: Nat Phys Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 20.034
Authors: Laura C Collins; Thomas G Witte; Rochelle Silverman; David B Green; Kenjiro K Gomes Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: S N Kempkes; M R Slot; S E Freeney; S J M Zevenhuizen; D Vanmaekelbergh; I Swart; C Morais Smith Journal: Nat Phys Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 20.034