Literature DB >> 3581623

Scintigraphic evaluation of duodenogastric reflux. Problems, pitfalls, and technical review.

W E Drane, K Karvelis, D A Johnson, E D Silverman.   

Abstract

Bile reflux has been implicated in the pathogenesis of gastritis, gastric ulcer, and esophagitis. Radionuclide techniques provide the only non-invasive method to detect duodenogastric reflux. To analyze the problems that occur with attempts at quantitation, 55 patients were prospectively evaluated (45 patients with reflux esophagitis or Barrett's esophagus and ten patients with clinical symptoms of bile reflux, four of whom had Bilroth II surgery) with Tc-99m DISIDA, using a fasting technique with gallbladder stimulation by sincalide. Visual duodenogastric reflux occurred in 16 of 55 patients. Overlap of small bowel with the stomach is the major problem for accurate quantitation and occurred in 20 of 55 patients (36%). Overlap of left lobe of the liver occurred in 40 of 55 patients (73%), but its contribution to gastric activity was slight and could be easily subtracted. Reflux was intermittent in six of the 16 positive studies (38%), and continuous computer acquisition is needed to detect its maximum value. Primarily because of the problem of small bowel overlap, scintigraphic evaluation of duodenogastric reflux is only, at best, semi-quantitative. A review of the technical variables used in this examination, as well as potential problems that can occur, is provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3581623     DOI: 10.1097/00003072-198705000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0363-9762            Impact factor:   7.794


  8 in total

1.  Reproducibility and intragastric variation of duodenogastric reflux using ambulatory gastric bilirubin monitoring.

Authors:  D K Manifold; A Anggiansah; R E Marshall; W J Owen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Dietary restrictions during ambulatory monitoring of duodenogastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Jan Tack; Raf Bisschops; Gerardus Koek; Daniel Sifrim; Tony Lerut; Jozef Janssens
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Contribution of acid and duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux to oesophageal mucosal injury and symptoms in partial gastrectomy patients [see comment].

Authors:  M F Vaezi; J E Richter
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Detecting Bile Reflux-the Enigma of Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas A Eldredge; Jennifer C Myers; George K Kiroff; Jonathan Shenfine
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Comparative evaluation of scintigraphy and upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy for detection of duodenogastric reflux.

Authors:  B R Mittal; M Ibrarullah; D K Agarwal; A Maini; W Ali; S S Sikora; B K Das
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.668

6.  Analysis of ambulatory duodenogastroesophageal reflux monitoring.

Authors:  R Cuomo; G Koek; D Sifrim; J Janssens; J Tack
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Primary duodenogastric reflux in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Dominique Hermans; Etienne-Marc Sokal; Jean-Marie Collard; Renato Romagnoli; Jean-Paul Buts
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Duodenogastric reflux in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  J P Waring; J Legrand; A Chinichian; R A Sanowski
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.199

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.