Guy Vishnevsky1, Ronit Sinnreich1, Hisham Nassar2, Dafna Merom3, Maya Ish-Shalom4,5, Jeremy D Kark1, Hagai Levine1. 1. Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hadassah University Medical Center, The Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. 2. Department of Cardiology, Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. 3. School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia. 4. The Institute of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Hypertension, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. 5. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Abstract
Total testosterone (TT) is known to influence health and virility in men. Among men from United States and Europe, numerous sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were reported to be associated with TT. However, associations with TT and Leydig cell function in the Middle East are poorly described. A cross-sectional, population-based sample had a structured interview, physical examinations, and blood tests in two hospitals in Jerusalem, Israel. A subsample (25- to 44-year-old men, n = 286: 124 Israelis, 162 Palestinians) had sex hormone measurements. The primary outcomes were TT and free testosterone/luteinizing hormone (FT/LH) ratio, representing Leydig cell function. Associations with sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, body mass index (BMI), and physical activity (PA) were evaluated using multivariable linear regression. Compared with Palestinians, Israelis had similar TT (4.81 vs. 5.09 ng/mL, p = .405) and higher FT/LH (31.2 vs. 25.8 ng/IU, p = .002). In ln-transformed values, marital status had a stronger association in Palestinians (P for interaction = 0.03). Age, BMI, and PA had a stronger association with TT in Israelis with significant interactions with ethnicity. BMI <25 and a higher PA quartile were associated with a higher TT (p < .001). Among Israelis, age (p = .007), married marital status (p = .007), and BMI <25 were significantly associated with FT/LH. No associations of any factors were identified among Palestinians. Associations with several modifiable factors identified in Western samples were replicated in Israelis and to a lesser degree in Palestinians. Different relationships of several factors with TT and FT/LH could result from ethnically diverse genetic, sociodemographic, and behavioral characteristics that warrant further research.
Total testosterone (TT) is known to influence health and virility in men. Among men from United States and Europe, numerous sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were reported to be associated with TT. However, associations with TT and Leydig cell function in the Middle East are poorly described. A cross-sectional, population-based sample had a structured interview, physical examinations, and blood tests in two hospitals in Jerusalem, Israel. A subsample (25- to 44-year-old men, n = 286: 124 Israelis, 162 Palestinians) had sex hormone measurements. The primary outcomes were TT and free testosterone/luteinizing hormone (FT/LH) ratio, representing Leydig cell function. Associations with sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, body mass index (BMI), and physical activity (PA) were evaluated using multivariable linear regression. Compared with Palestinians, Israelis had similar TT (4.81 vs. 5.09 ng/mL, p = .405) and higher FT/LH (31.2 vs. 25.8 ng/IU, p = .002). In ln-transformed values, marital status had a stronger association in Palestinians (P for interaction = 0.03). Age, BMI, and PA had a stronger association with TT in Israelis with significant interactions with ethnicity. BMI <25 and a higher PA quartile were associated with a higher TT (p < .001). Among Israelis, age (p = .007), married marital status (p = .007), and BMI <25 were significantly associated with FT/LH. No associations of any factors were identified among Palestinians. Associations with several modifiable factors identified in Western samples were replicated in Israelis and to a lesser degree in Palestinians. Different relationships of several factors with TT and FT/LH could result from ethnically diverse genetic, sociodemographic, and behavioral characteristics that warrant further research.
Testosterone (T), the primary sex hormone in men, is well known to be related to a
variety of diseases and conditions in both men and women. Low testosterone serum
concentrations are associated with male hypogonadism, a very prevalent medical
concern—estimated at about 6% of middle-aged men, depending on definition and study
population (Al-Sharefi &
Quinton, 2020; Marcelli & Mediwala, 2020; Paduch et al., 2014). It presents with
infertility, libido disturbances, erectile dysfunction, chronic fatigue, depression
and mood changes, and osteoporosis (Paduch et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2013). Low testosterone serum
concentrations are also associated with cardiovascular disease, stroke (Svartberg et al., 2003),
metabolic and all-cause mortality (Haring et al., 2010; McBride et al., 2016). Understanding the
factors that influence total testosterone (TT) is important for men’s health.Hypogonadism is closely associated with Leydig cell dysfunction, which is prevalent
in certain clinical settings such as older men. Possible mechanisms are reduced
number or function of Leydig cells, a lower amplitude of luteinizing hormone (LH)
secretion, and hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis insensitivity (McBride et al., 2016;
Vermeulen et al.,
1993).Measurement of testosterone concentrations is complicated by the presence of several
fractions in the serum. Only 2% to 3% of TT is unbound, free testosterone (FT; Allen et al., 2002; De Ronde et al., 2006;
Paduch et al.,
2014). An additional ~60% of TT is specifically bound to sex hormone binding
globulin (SHBG) and is physiologically inactive; the active fraction is bioavailable
testosterone (BT) that includes the free testosterone and the fraction bound to
albumin (38%). In practice, TT is the most common fraction used and FT is usually
estimated from TT and SHBG rather than measured directly. It is calculated (cFT)
using complex different algorithms (De Ronde et al., 2006; Paduch et al., 2014; Vermeulen et al., 1999)
such as the Vermeulen algorithm.The TT/LH ratios have been previously used (Andersson et al., 2004; Holmboe et al., 2017;
Wu et al., 2008) to
investigate testicular response and production capacity, that is, Leydig cell
function. FT directly exerts the androgenic effect on tissue and is arguably more
indicative of the physiological androgenic activity than TT (Beattie et al., 2015; McBride et al., 2016; Paduch et al., 2014);
thus, free testosterone/luteinizing hormone (FT/LH) ratios might prove to be a
better proxy for Leydig cell function. Few studies to date reported FT/LH (Halling et al., 2013;
Priskorn et al.,
2016).Previous research in andrology (Allen et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2003; Paduch et al., 2014; Ravnborg et al., 2011; Shiels et al., 2009; Svartberg et al., 2003;
Wang et al., 2013;
Wu et al., 2008) has
shed some light on various sociodemographic and modifiable lifestyle factors that
are associated with concentrations of testosterone in different populations. In most
studies to date, TT and FT concentrations decrease in a physiologic, age-dependent
fashion, estimated to be about 0.4% to 2% a year after 30 years of age (Andersson et al., 2007;
McBride et al.,
2016). Relationship and marital status are also well known (Gray et al., 2006; Holmboe et al., 2017;
Maestripieri et al.,
2014) to be associated with testosterone concentrations as testosterone
is widely speculated to be related to human reproductive effort (Gray et al., 2017). The
TT/LH concentrations are unaffected by marital status, suggesting unaffected Leydig
cell function (Holmboe et al.,
2017); No information is available regarding FT/LH ratio. Data regarding
other demographic factors associated with sex hormones, such as religiosity and
education, remain scarce.Numerous studies investigated the association between TT and modifiable risk factors
such as smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, and physical activity (PA). Cigarette
smoking and testosterone consistently demonstrate (Allen et al., 2002; Shiels et al., 2009; Svartberg et al., 2003; Svartberg & Jorde,
2006; Wang et al.,
2013) a rise in TT, FT, SHBG, and LH in smokers, with a dose–response
pattern. Most sources describe alcohol and testosterone concentrations as having no
or weak associations (Allen et
al., 2002; Muller et
al., 2003; Svartberg
et al., 2003). The body mass index (BMI; and other measures of obesity
such as waist circumference) are associated with decreased TT, FT, SHBG, and LH
(Derby et al., 2006;
Paduch et al., 2014;
Svartberg et al.,
2003). The association of PA and sex hormones is inconclusive (Allen et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2003; Shiels et al., 2009; Svartberg et al., 2003).
Associations of any of the modifiable risk factors mentioned and FT/LH ratios are
still unknown.Ethnic differences in sex hormone concentrations are well-documented in North
American and Scandinavian populations (Halling et al., 2013; Lopez et al., 2017; Maestripieri et al., 2014;
Rohrmann et al.,
2007). Ethnicity was reported to have an effect modification, or
interaction, with relationship status (Maestripieri et al., 2014): single men had
a higher concentration of TT than their involved counterparts, unless they were
Asian American—an ethnic group in which single men had lower testosterone
concentrations than non-single men.Population-based andrological data on Middle Eastern ethnicities, however, are
lacking. Israelis and Palestinians living in West and East Jerusalem, respectively,
represent two distinct populations—both culturally and socioeconomically. While
Israelis and Palestinians have a partial overlap in ancestry, they are regarded as
separate ethnicities. Moreover, health-related behavior, such as smoking, obesity,
and PA, differs greatly between the two populations, and so do other determinants of
health (Kark et al.,
2006; Merom et al.,
2012).While substantial differences in habits, social factors, and genetics exist between
the two populations, data also point to an overlap in ancestry leading to genetic
similarities (Thomas et al.,
2002) and shared detrimental health outcomes in light of the regional
political conflict. (Ayer et
al., 2017)This study aimed to assess differences in TT and FT/LH ratios between Palestinian and
Israeli young men (25–44 years old).We also aimed to identify associations of sex hormones with sociodemographic and
modifiable lifestyle factors; In particular, we also aimed to investigate whether
ethnicity modifies these associations.An additional aim was to assess FT/LH as a measure for Leydig cell function.
Method
Study Population
Since 1967, Palestinians in East Jerusalem are Israeli citizens or permanent
residents. As such, they have social security privileges and health insurance,
and are registered in the national population registry (Pechter Polls, 2011).The study population was drawn from the Jerusalem Palestinian–Israeli Middle
Eastern Regional Cooperation (MERC) Risk Factor Study. The MERC Risk Factor
Study was a population-based cross-sectional study designed to assess and
compare cardiovascular risk. Data collection was conducted between 2004 and
2008. The 4,000 planned participants were men and women aged between 25 and 74
years, chosen randomly, based on the national registry, with each sex-age decile
including 200 individuals—2,000 Israelis and 2,000 Palestinians. A flowchart of
the sample is depicted in Figure 1. Participants were recruited by a letter of invitation and
subsequent phone calls. Exclusion criteria included institutionalization or
presence of a serious disease or house-bounding condition. A total of 53.7% of
Israelis and 76.7% of Palestinians responded and arrived at the two designated
hospitals. The Israelis arrived at Hadassah Ein Kerem in West Jerusalem and the
Palestinians arrived at St. Joseph in East Jerusalem, comprising a population of
712 Israelis and 970 Palestinians. All patients signed a written informed
consent. Ethical approval (No. 28-30.3.01) from the Hadassah Medical Center
institutional review board was obtained.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of the Sample Enrolled in the Study
Flowchart of the Sample Enrolled in the StudyA prespecified subgroup of this population, namely, 286 men (124 Israelis and 162
Palestinians) aged between 25 and 44 years, with full sex hormone measurements,
was included in this study.
Data Collection
All compliant participants were scheduled for a morning appointment in which they
underwent a standardized interview, physical examination, and additional exams.
The confidentiality of study participants was ensured by anonymization of all
gathered data, using a participant identification code. All patient blood
samples were drawn between 08:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m., following an overnight
fast. Samples were frozen and stored at −80°C until analysis of thawed
aliquots.
Measures and Variables
Origin was established by paternal country of birth. Smoking status of cigarettes
and hookah was estimated from self-report and categorized into never (less than
100 lifetime cigarettes/50 hookahs), former, and current smokers. Alcohol
consumption was likewise self-reported and categorized into none, less than once
a week, and once a week and greater. Marital status was dichotomized by
cohabitation—single versus cohabitant (comprised mostly of married men, with
some men reporting “living together with a partner”—hereafter referred to as
“married”).Religiosity was estimated from self-report as Orthodox, observant, or secular;
Orthodox Jews were grouped together with observant Jews as “religious Israelis.”
Education levels were as follows: primary, high school (HS) attendance but
without passing Israeli matriculation exams, HS matriculation (possibly having a
nonacademic degree), and academic degree holders.The BMI was categorized as normal/underweight (<25; only two participants had
BMI <18.5), overweight (>25), or obese (>30). Physical activity (PA)
estimation was meticulously described in a previous publication (Merom et al., 2012);
in brief, The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) questionnaire was
used to assess PA in the month leading to the interview. The duration of 28
specific activities across several domains (work, leisure, home chores, and
volunteering) and respective metabolic equivalent (MET) were used to calculate
weekly energy expenditure (EE) in MET-minutes, which were classified as light
(<3 METs), moderate (3–6 METs), or vigorous (>6 METs). Moderate or
vigorous PA (MVPA), known to be health enhancing (Haskell et al., 2007), was expressed
in EE units (min*MET*week–1) and broken into quartiles.
Hormone Assays
All sex hormones serum concentrations were measured by immunoassay in a single
laboratory at the Sourasky (Ichilov) Medical Center in Tel Aviv, Israel. The TT,
LH, and SHBG concentrations were measured using chemiluminescent immunometric
assays performed on automatic auto analyzers (Cobas e411, Roche Diagnostics,
Indianapolis, USA for TT; IMMULITE 2000 XPi Immunoassay System, Siemens Health
care Diagnostics Product, Llanberis, Gwynedd, UK for LH and SHBG). Intra-assay
coefficients of variance (CV) were 1.7% (TT), 3.04% (LH), and 2.5% (SHBG).
Inter-assay CVs were 7.4%, 5.11%, and 5.3%, and limits of detection were 2.5
ng/dL, 0.02 nmol/L, and 0.05 mIU/mL, respectively. The Vermeulen formula (De Ronde et al., 2006;
Vermeulen et al.,
1999) was used to calculate FT. The analyses focused on TT and
FT/LH.
Statistical Analysis
Hormone levels were compared between Israelis and Palestinians. The association
between categorical variables was tested using the chi-square test or the
Fisher’s exact test, with the linear-by-linear procedure for trend analysis. The
scale variable correlations were assessed using Spearman’s correlation
coefficient as sex hormones distributions were not normal. The comparison of
scale variables between two independent groups, such as Israelis and
Palestinians, was carried out by using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney
U test; for three groups or more, Kruskal–Wallis test was
employed to check for differences, supplemented with the Jonckheere–Terpstra
test for trend analysis. The analysis of variance (ANOVA), with Tukey’s or
Dunett T3 correction for multiple comparisons, was used where appropriate.Hormone measurements were ln-transformed. “Enter” and “Stepwise” multivariable
linear regressions were used for each outcome. Variables were hierarchal,
entered in blocks—age and ethnicity (basic model), marital status, religiosity,
and education level (demographic model), smoking status and alcohol use
(lifestyle model), and BMI and PA (PA and BMI model) were entered in sequence.
Interaction variables were then added to the final primary outcome linear
regression model alongside main effects. Back transformation (Holmboe et al., 2017;
Jensen et al.,
2014) of ln-transformed hormone concentrations was used to obtain the
percentage change in these variables.Additional multivariable linear regression models, including different iterations
of all the dependent variables (i.e., anthropometric scale variables instead of
categorized variables) were also employed for sensitivity analyses.All tests applied were two-tailed, with α = .05. In the regression models,
p values for F statistic were set to .05 for entry and .1
for removal. Interaction was considered significant if p value
was .2 or lower.
Results
Sociodemographic Characteristics
Age distribution in our sample was similar for Israelis and Palestinians, with a
mean of 36.4 years (Table
1). In contrast, while about a quarter of Israelis were single
(n = 32, 25.8%) and were sons to fathers not born in Israel
(n = 32, 25.8%), almost all Palestinians were cohabitant
(n = 146, 90.7%) and sons to Israel-born fathers,
n = 158, 97.5%; p < .001 for (paternal)
origin and marital status.
Table 1.
Demographic and Lifestyle Factors Among Israelis (n = 124), Palestinians
(n = 162) and the Entire Sample (n = 286).
Characteristic
Israelis (n = 124)
Palestinians (n = 162)
p value
Total (n = 286)
Age, mean (SD);
36.4 (5.8);
36.3 (5.4);
.867
36.3 (5.6);
median (range)
36.9 (25.3–45.0)
36.9 (25.7–45.0)
36.9 (25.3–45.0)
Origin (paternal), n (%)
<.0001
Israel
92 (74.2%)
158 (97.5%)
250 (87.4%)
Other
32 (25.8%)
4 (2.5%)
36 (12.6%)
Marital status, n (%)*
<.001
Single
32 (25.8%)
15 (9.3%)
47 (16.5%)
Married or living together
92 (74.2%)
146 (90.7%)
238 (83.5%)
Religiosity, n (%)*
<.001
Observant or Orthodox
54 (43.5%)
39 (24.2%)
93 (32.6%)
Traditional
30 (24.2%)
107 (66.5%)
137 (48.1%)
Secular
40 (32.3%)
15 (9.3%)
55 (19.3%)
Highest education, n (%)*
<.001
Primary
19 (15.3%)
68 (42.2%)
87 (30.5%)
HS
27 (21.8%)
19 (11.8%)
46 (16.1%)
HS matriculation
41 (33.1%)
47 (29.2%)
88 (30.9%)
Academic degree
37 (29.8%)
27 (16.8%)
64 (22.5%)
Smoking, cigarettes or hookah,
n (%)*
.035
Never smoker
46 (37.1%)
40 (24.8%)
86 (30.2%)
Former smoker
33 (26.6%)
40 (24.8%)
73 (25.6%)
Current smoker
45 (36.3%)
81 (50.3%)
126 (44.2%)
Alcohol use, n (%)*
<.001
No consumption
14 (11.4%)
135 (84.4%)
149 (52.7%)
Less than once a week
46 (37.4%)
12 (7.5%)
58 (20.5%)
≥once a week
63 (51.2%)
13 (8.1%)
76 (26.9%)
BMI group, n (%)
.16
<25
51 (41.1%)
49 (30.2%)
100 (35.0%)
25–30
48 (38.7%)
75 (46.3%)
123 (43.0%)
≥30
25 (20.2%)
38 (23.5%)
63 (22.0%)
MVPA EE (MET*min/week)
quartiles, n (%)
<.001
Q1 (lowest)
47 (37.9%)
26 (16.0%)
73 (25.5%)
Q2
38 (30.6%)
32 (19.8%)
70 (24.5%)
Q3
29 (23.4%)
43 (26.5%)
72 (25.2%)
Q4
10 (8.1%)
61 (37.7%)
71 (24.8%)
Note. HS = High school; BMI = body mass index; MVPA
= moderate or vigorous physical activity; EE = energy expenditure;
MET = metabolic equivalent; Q = quartile.
Numbers do not add up to 100% because of missing values.
Demographic and Lifestyle Factors Among Israelis (n = 124), Palestinians
(n = 162) and the Entire Sample (n = 286).Note. HS = High school; BMI = body mass index; MVPA
= moderate or vigorous physical activity; EE = energy expenditure;
MET = metabolic equivalent; Q = quartile.Numbers do not add up to 100% because of missing values.The Israelis significantly tended to be more secular (n = 40,
32.3% vs. n = 15, 9.3% were secular) and more educated
(n = 78, 62.9% vs. n = 74, 46.0% achieved
high school matriculation; p < .001 for education and
religiosity). Palestinians were heavier smokers than Israelis:
p = .035 for smoking status—n = 81, 50.3%
vs. n = 45, 36.3% were currently smoking. Palestinians drank
less alcohol: p < .001 for alcohol
consumption—n = 13, 8.1% vs. n = 63, 51.2%
had alcohol once a week or more frequently.The Palestinians had a higher MVPA EE (n = 104, 64.2% vs.
n = 39, 31.5% were placed above the grand median,
p < .001). Differences in BMI groups were insignificant
(p = .16)—n = 73, 58.9% of Israelis were
overweight or obese, compared with n = 113, 69.8% of
Palestinians.
Hormone Levels in Israelis and Palestinians
Hormone concentrations box plots are presented in Figure 2, along with means and
p values. As depicted, TT and FT concentrations were
similar in Israelis and Palestinians. Israelis had lower LH (3.90 vs. 4.96 IU/L,
p < .0001) and higher FT/LH ratios (31.2 vs. 25.8 ng/IU,
p = .002) than Palestinians.
Figure 2.
Box Plots of TT (ng/mL), FT (ng/mL), LH (IU/L), FT/LH (ng/IU), SHBG
(nmol/L) by Ethnicity
Note. TT = total testosterone; FT = free testosterone;
LH = luteinizing hormone; SHBG = sex hormone binding globulin.
Box Plots of TT (ng/mL), FT (ng/mL), LH (IU/L), FT/LH (ng/IU), SHBG
(nmol/L) by EthnicityNote. TT = total testosterone; FT = free testosterone;
LH = luteinizing hormone; SHBG = sex hormone binding globulin.We evaluated (Table
2) the different TT concentration and FT/LH ratio stratified to
sociodemographic and lifestyle variables and then to Israelis and Palestinians.
The FT, LH, and SHBG levels (Supplemental Table 1; henceforth S1) were not included in this
analysis and are briefly mentioned. In both Israelis and Palestinians, age was
significantly correlated with TT (p < .001; Spearman’s ρ
–.32 and –.30, respectively, not shown). FT/LH was correlated with age only in
Israeli men (p = .002, Spearman’s ρ –.278).
Table 2.
Total Testosterone and FT/LH Concentrations According to Sociodemographic
and Lifestyle Factors, Stratified by Group.
Total testosterone (ng/mL)
FT/LH (ng/IU)
Israelis (n =
124)
Palestinians (n
= 162)
Israelis (n =
124)
Palestinians (n
= 162)
Characteristic
M
SD
M
SD
M
SD
M
SD
Entire cohort
4.81
2.05
5.09
2.19
31.2
15.5
25.8
12.7
Marital status
Single
5.55
2.21
6.83
2.69
30.0
15.1
24.7
12.4
Married or living together
4.56
1.93
4.91
2.07
31.6
15.7
25.9
12.8
p value
.016
.001
.784
.776
Religiosity*
Observant or Orthodox
4.44
1.91
5.01
2.52
28.3
14.8
26.7
11.9
Traditional
4.98
1.90
5.12
2.09
33.4
15.1
25.7
13.3
Secular
5.19
2.28
5.01
2.2
33.4
16.6
23.4
11.3
p value for heterogeneity
.107
.777
.111
.633
Highest education*
Primary
4.18
1.47
5.40
2.25
25.6
11.9
25.8
12.5
HS
4.66
2.24
5.54
2.82
31.6
16.6
25.0
11.5
HS matriculation
5.61
2.27
4.44
1.55
35.6
16.8
24.6
13.8
Academic degree
4.38
1.65
5.09
2.40
28.8
14.1
28.0
12.4
p value for heterogeneity
.028
.095
.052
.580
Smoking, cigarettes, or hookah*
Never smoker
4.74
2.28
4.80
2.17
29.5
14.8
29.3
13.1
Former smoker
4.22
1.79
4.32
1.70
29.9
14.7
25.6
14.0
Current smoker
5.33
1.88
5.60
2.31
33.8
16.8
24.1
11.6
p value for heterogeneity
.016
.005
.399
.096
Alcohol use*
No consumption
4.90
2.23
4.92
2.21
24.9
10.5
26.4
13.3
Less than once a week
4.63
2.26
6.45
2.32
27.0
11.4
21.4
7.1
≥once a week
4.96
1.86
5.66
1.49
35.8
17.7
23.9
9.8
p value for heterogeneity
.456
.014
.021
.063
BMI group, n (%)
<25
6.05
2.16
6.34
2.44
37.4
17.4
26.7
12.8
25–30
4.42
1.37
4.92
1.90
28.5
14.2
24.4
12.1
≥30
3.06
1.13
3.83
1.49
23.4
7.3
27.5
14.0
p value for heterogeneity
<.001
<.001
.001
.385
MVPA EE (MET*min/wk)
quartiles
Q1 (lowest)
3.85
1.48
4.56
1.69
26.2
13.3
26.2
10.7
Q2
5.34
2.33
4.00
1.67
33.3
16.1
23.4
11.3
Q3
5.53
1.77
5.14
2.50
36.8
17.4
25.8
14.9
Q4
5.25
2.45
5.86
2.13
30.0
11.7
26.9
12.7
p value for heterogeneity
<.001
<.001
.022
.491
Note. FT = free testosterone; LH = luteinizing
hormone; HS = high school; BMI = body mass index; MVPA = moderate or
vigorous physical activity; EE = energy expenditure; MET = metabolic
equivalent; Q = quartile.
Numbers do not add up to 100% because of missing values.
Total Testosterone and FT/LH Concentrations According to Sociodemographic
and Lifestyle Factors, Stratified by Group.Note. FT = free testosterone; LH = luteinizing
hormone; HS = high school; BMI = body mass index; MVPA = moderate or
vigorous physical activity; EE = energy expenditure; MET = metabolic
equivalent; Q = quartile.Numbers do not add up to 100% because of missing values.Married men had significantly lower TT (4.77 vs. 5.96 ng/mL, p
< .001), FT (0.10 vs. 0.12 ng/mL, p < .001), and LH (4.36
vs. 5.23 IU/L, p = .036) levels than their previously or never
married counterparts; FT/LH was not different between groups. We discovered
that, in both Israelis and Palestinians, marital status was associated with TT
but not with FT/LH: married Israelis had a TT of 4.56 ng/mL compared with 5.55
ng/mL in single Israelis, whereas the concentrations in Palestinian men were
4.91 ng/mL and 6.83 ng/mL, respectively.Religiosity strata were not associated with TT and FT/LH. Education levels had a
weak association with TT in Israelis only, which was not significant in the
strata direct ad hoc analysis. Smoking cigarettes or hookah was associated with
higher TT, FT, and LH, than either former or never smoking. FT/LH ratio was not
different across smoking status. The TT, FT/LH findings from the entire sample
were replicated in Israelis and Palestinians separately.A trend-like association was revealed between higher alcohol consumption and
lower LH, higher FT/LH ratio (p trend .012 and .003,
respectively; FT/LH was 33.8 vs. 26.2 ng/IU in ≥1 drink/week and no
consumption). The FT/LH association with alcohol intake was similarly present in
Israelis only (35.8 vs. 24.9 ng/IU in ≥1 drink/week and no consumption,
respectively; p = .021).
Associations With BMI and Physical Activity
Strong trends were apparent for associations of BMI and MVPA with all the
hormones we included in S1 and Table 2. They are succinctly presented
in Figure 3.
Figure 3.
BMI and MVPA Associations in the Entire Sample, Israelis, and
Palestinians.
Note. ↑↑, ↓↓ = p < .01; ↑, ↓ =
p < .05; 0 = no association; BMI = body mass
index; MVPA = moderate or vigorous physical activity.
BMI and MVPA Associations in the Entire Sample, Israelis, and
Palestinians.Note. ↑↑, ↓↓ = p < .01; ↑, ↓ =
p < .05; 0 = no association; BMI = body mass
index; MVPA = moderate or vigorous physical activity.The TT levels in men with BMI <25 were 6.19 ng/ml in the entire sample,
remarkably higher (p < .001) than levels in BMI ≥30 (3.52
ng/ml), and a similar trend followed in all other hormones (S1). This
association carried over to both ethnicities (p < .001).
Israelis had a corresponding level of 6.05 ng/ml versus 3.06 ng/ml between these
groups—almost double. Palestinians’ levels were 6.34 ng/ml and 3.83 ng/ml.The FT/LH ratios were also remarkably higher for all BMI <25 versus obese men
(32.2 vs. 25.9 ng/IU, (p < .001), and more so in Israelis
(37.4 vs. 23.4 ng/IU, p = .001). The FT/LH levels were quite
similar in Palestinians in all BMI groups (p =.385).TT rose significantly (p < .0001 for all) between rising MVPA
quartiles in the entire sample (4.10–5.77 ng/ml) in Israelis (3.85–5.25 ng/ml)
and in Palestinians (4.56–5.86 ng/ml).Physical activity was positively correlated with all other hormones as well,
other than with FT/LH ratio (p = .714). The Palestinians shared
this lack of association (p = .491) with minimum differences
between Q1 (26.2 ng/IU) and Q4 (26.9 ng/IU). However, Israelis had an
association (p = .022) with rising MVPA quartiles weakened by
FT/LH levels in Q4 (comprising 10 Israelis—30.0 ng/IU) being lower than Q2 and
Q3 (33.3 and 36.8 ng/IU).
Multivariable Regression Models
Hierarchal multivariable regression was used to assess the associations of the
independent variables with TT and FT/LH, adjusting for all other variables
(Supplemental Tables 2 and 3). As associations were mostly
similar throughout the process of addition of other variables, only the final
models are reported in Tables 3 to 6. These tables include models generated for Israelis, Palestinians,
and for the entire sample, with and without interaction variables. As depicted
in summary in Figure 4,
the most noteworthy associations identified were in BMI and MVPA.
Table 3.
TT, Final Hierarchical Multivariable Linear Regression Model
(Sociodemographic and Lifestyle, PA and BMI), ln Transformed, in the
Entire Sample, With and Without Interaction (n = 283).
Variable
Comparison
Final (PA and BMI) model
Final model with interaction
variables
B
95% CI
p value
B
95% CI
p value
P-int
Ethnicity
Palestinian vs. Israeli
0.02
[−0.11, 0.15]
.777
−0.16
[−0.82, 0.50]
.626
Age
Per 1 year
−0.01
[−0.02, 0.00]
.005
−0.02
[−0.03, 0.00]
.006
0.112
Marital status
Cohabitation yes vs. no
−0.13
[−0.25, −0.01[
.028
−0.01
[−0.16, 0.14]
.863
0.030
Religiosity
Observant and Orthodox
Traditional
0.02
[−0.08, 0.13]
.638
0.00
[−0.16, 0.17]
.955
0.873
Secular
0.05
[−0.08, 0.18]
.445
0.06
[−0.09, 0.22]
.414
0.089
Highest education
Academic degree
HS matriculation
0.06
[−0.06, 0.17]
.335
0.23
[0.08, 0.38]
.003
0.001
HS
−0.01
[−0.15, 0.13]
0.868
−0.01
[−0.19, 0.18]
.931
0.987
Primary
0.14
[0.01, 0.27]
0.032
0.15
[−0.06, 0.36]
.173
0.450
Smoking, cigarettes or hookah
Current smoker
Former smoker
−0.10
[−0.21, 0.00]
0.055
0.00
[−0.17, 0.17]
.988
0.236
Never smoker
−0.08
[−0.18, 0.03]
0.144
−0.05
[−0.21, 0.11]
.533
0.397
Alcohol use
None
less than once a week
0.05
[−0.09, 0.18]
0.502
−0.23
[−0.44, 0.03]
.028
0.009
once a week or more
0.01
[−0.13, 0.15]
0.878
−0.28
[−0.49, −0.07]
.009
0.004
BMI group
<25
25–30
−0.23
[−0.33, −0.13]
<0.001
−0.27
[−0.41, −0.13]
.000
0.256
≥30
−0.50
[−0.62, −0.38]
<0.001
−0.63
[−0.81, −0.45]
.000
0.091
MVPA EE
Q1 (lowest)
Q2
0.05
[−0.06, 0.17]
0.363
0.18
[0.03, 0.33]
.021
0.015
Q3
0.19
[0.07, 0.31]
0.002
0.29
[0.12, 0.45]
.001
0.154
Q4
0.23
[0.10, 0.36]
<0.001
0.23
[−0.04, 0.49]
.091
0.735
R2
.392
.483
Sig. F change
<.001
Note. TT = total testosterone; HS = high school; PA
= physical activity; BMI = body mass index; MVPA = moderate or
vigorous physical activity; EE = energy expenditure; MET = metabolic
equivalent; P-int = p value for interaction with
ethnicity; Q = quartile.
Table 6.
FT/LH, Final Hierarchical Multivariable Linear Regression Model
(Sociodemographic and Lifestyle, PA and BMI), ln Transformed, in the
Entire Sample, With and Without Interaction (n = 283).
Variable
Comparison
Final (PA and BMI) model
Final Model with interaction
variables
B
95% CI
p value
B
95% CI
p value
P-int
Ethnicity
Palestinian vs. Israeli
−0.22
[−0.41, −0.03]
.025
−0.3
[–1.27, 0.67]
.540
Age
Per 1 year
−0.02
[−0.03, −0.01]
.002
−0.02
[−0.04, −0.01]
.010
0.343
Marital status
Cohabitation yes vs. no
0.19
[0.02, 0.36]
.030
0.29
[0.07, 0.50]
.010
0.537
Religiosity
Observant and Orthodox
Traditional
0.03
[−0.12, 0.18]
.679
0.12
[−0.13, 0.36]
.345
0.247
Secular
0.04
[−0.14, 0.22]
.657
0.02
[−0.21, 0.25]
.853
0.549
Highest education
Academic degree
HS matriculation
0.05
[−0.12, 0.21]
.560
0.24
[0.02, 0.47]
.030
0.013
HS
−0.02
[−0.22, 0.18]
.826
0.09
[−0.19, 0.36]
.538
0.341
Primary
−0.01
[−0.19, 0.17]
.880
0.02
[−0.29, 0.33]
.906
0.496
Smoking, cigarettes or hookah
Current smoker
Former smoker
−0.01
[−0.17, 0.14]
.850
−0.01
[−0.25, 0.24]
.955
0.869
Never smoker
0.08
[−0.07, 0.22]
.311
−0.07
[−0.30, 0.17]
.578
0.093
Alcohol use
None
less than once a week
−0.08
[−0.28, 0.11]
.392
−0.05
[−0.35, 0.26]
.755
0.906
≥once a week
0.09
[−0.11, 0.28]
.388
0.13
[−0.17, 0.44]
.395
0.444
BMI group
<25
25-30
−0.18
[−0.32, −0.04]
.010
−0.26
[−0.46, −0.05]
.013
0.154
≥30
−0.08
[−0.25, 0.09]
.355
−0.28
[−0.54, −0.02]
.038
0.033
MVPA EE
Q1 (lowest)
Q2
0.09
[−0.07, 0.26]
.275
0.12
[−0.10, 0.35]
.279
0.172
Q3
0.12
[−0.06, 0.29]
.186
0.19
[−0.06, 0.43]
.137
0.198
Q4
0.13
[−0.05, 0.32]
.151
0.08
[−0.31, 0.47]
.672
0.991
R2
.141
.224
Sig. F Change
.052
Note. FT = free testosterone; LH = luteinizing
hormone; HS = high school; PA = physical activity; BMI = body mass
index; MVPA = moderate or vigorous physical activity; EE = energy
expenditure; MET = metabolic equivalent; P int = p
value for interaction with ethnicity; Q = quartile.
Figure 4.
Hierarchal BMI and MVPA Final Models Summary: Associations of BMI, MVPA
in Israelis, Palestinians, the Entire Sample, and the Interaction
Model
Note. ↑↑, ↓↓ = p < .01; ↑, ↓ =
p < .05; 0 = no association; * = negative
insignificant association (see text); BMI = body mass index; MVPA =
moderate or vigorous physical activity.
TT, Final Hierarchical Multivariable Linear Regression Model
(Sociodemographic and Lifestyle, PA and BMI), ln Transformed, in the
Entire Sample, With and Without Interaction (n = 283).Note. TT = total testosterone; HS = high school; PA
= physical activity; BMI = body mass index; MVPA = moderate or
vigorous physical activity; EE = energy expenditure; MET = metabolic
equivalent; P-int = p value for interaction with
ethnicity; Q = quartile.TT, Final Hierarchical Multivariable Linear Regression Model
(Sociodemographic and Lifestyle, PA and BMI), ln Transformed, in
Israelis and Palestinians.Note. TT = total testosterone; HS = high school; BMI
= body mass index; PA = physical activity; MVPA = moderate or
vigorous physical activity; EE = energy expenditure; MET = metabolic
equivalent; P-int = p value for interaction with
ethnicity; Q = quartile.FT/LH, Final Hierarchical Multivariable Linear Regression Model
(Sociodemographic and Lifestyle, PA and BMI), ln Transformed, in
Israelis and Palestinians.Note. FT = free testosterone; LH = luteinizing
hormone; HS = high school; BMI = body mass index; PA = physical
activity; MVPA = moderate or vigorous physical activity; EE = energy
expenditure; MET = metabolic equivalent; P-int = p
value for interaction with ethnicity; Q = quartile.FT/LH, Final Hierarchical Multivariable Linear Regression Model
(Sociodemographic and Lifestyle, PA and BMI), ln Transformed, in the
Entire Sample, With and Without Interaction (n = 283).Note. FT = free testosterone; LH = luteinizing
hormone; HS = high school; PA = physical activity; BMI = body mass
index; MVPA = moderate or vigorous physical activity; EE = energy
expenditure; MET = metabolic equivalent; P int = p
value for interaction with ethnicity; Q = quartile.Hierarchal BMI and MVPA Final Models Summary: Associations of BMI, MVPA
in Israelis, Palestinians, the Entire Sample, and the Interaction
ModelNote. ↑↑, ↓↓ = p < .01; ↑, ↓ =
p < .05; 0 = no association; * = negative
insignificant association (see text); BMI = body mass index; MVPA =
moderate or vigorous physical activity.Included as a variable in the entire sample model (Table 3), ethnicity was not associated
with lnTT. In Israelis (Table 4), age was associated with lnTT in the final model
(B = −0.02 per year, p = .007), and also
in the entire sample. In Palestinians, however, age was associated with lnTT
only in an adjusted Spearman’s correlation. An interaction was identified
(Pint = 0.112). Marital status, on the contrary, was
significantly associated in Palestinians (B = −0.29,
p = .005) and the entire sample, but was not in Israelis.
It lost significance in the interaction model, in which it had a Pint
of 0.030.
Table 4
TT, Final Hierarchical Multivariable Linear Regression Model
(Sociodemographic and Lifestyle, PA and BMI), ln Transformed, in
Israelis and Palestinians.
Variable
Comparison
Israelis (n =
123)
Palestinians (n
= 160)
B
95% CI
p value
B
95% CI
p value
Age
Per 1 year
−0.02
[−0.03, 0.00]
.007
0.00
[−0.01, 0.01]
.558
Marital status
Cohabitation yes vs. no
−0.01
[−0.16, 0.14]
.863
−0.29
[−0.48, −0.09]
.005
Religiosity
Observant and Orthodox
Reference category
Traditional
0.00
[−0.16, 0.17]
.955
−0.01
[−0.15, 0.12]
.854
Secular
0.06
[−0.09, 0.22]
.416
−0.18
[−0.41, 0.05]
.133
Highest education
Academic degree
Reference category
HS matriculation
0.23
[0.08, 0.38]
.003
−0.16
[−0.33, 0.01]
.071
HS
−0.01
[−0.20, 0.18]
.931
−0.01
[−0.22, 0.20]
.919
Primary
0.15
[−0.07, 0.36]
.176
0.04
[−0.12, 0.21]
.612
Smoking, cigarettes or hookah
Current smoker
Reference category
Former smoker
0.00
[−0.17, 0.17]
.988
−0.13
[−0.26, 0.00]
.059
Never smoker
−0.05
[−0.21, 0.11]
.534
−0.14
[−0.28, 0.00]
.043
Alcohol use
None
Reference category
Less than once a week
−0.23
[−0.44, −0.02]
.03
0.17
[−0.05, 0.39]
.126
Once a week or more
−0.28
[−0.49, −0.07]
.01
0.14
[−0.06, 0.33]
.161
BMI group
<25
Reference category
25-30
−0.27
[−0.41, −0.13]
<.001
−0.16
[−0.29, −0.03]
.015
≥30
−0.63
[−0.81, −0.44]
<.001
−0.42
[−0.58, −0.27]
.000
MVPA EE
Q1 (lowest)
Reference category
Q2
0.18
[0.03, 0.33]
.023
−0.11
[−0.29, 0.07]
.215
Q3
0.29
[0.12, 0.46]
.001
0.12
[−0.05, 0.28]
.171
Q4
0.23
[−0.04, 0.50]
.093
0.18
[0.02, 0.33]
.030
R2
.530
.436
Note. TT = total testosterone; HS = high school; BMI
= body mass index; PA = physical activity; MVPA = moderate or
vigorous physical activity; EE = energy expenditure; MET = metabolic
equivalent; P-int = p value for interaction with
ethnicity; Q = quartile.
Religiosity, education levels, and smoking did not have a clear trend regarding
associations with lnTT. Alcohol consumption demonstrated a strong negative
association in Israelis—B = −0.23, p = .03 in
those drinking less than once a week, and B = −0.28,
p = .01 in those drinking more than once a week, compared
with nondrinkers. Palestinians had no clear association (p >
.05) and interaction for both strata between Israelis and Palestinians was
pronounced (Pint = 0.004 and 0.009).BMI was negatively associated quite strongly with lnTT in all four final models
generated. Contrasted with BMI <25, with B values of the 25
to 30 BMI group ranging from −0.16 to −0.27, BMI >30 had B
values of −0.42 to −0.63 (p < .02 in all analyses). Stronger
associations were revealed in Israelis and a mild interaction was identified for
the BMI >30 group—Pint = 0.091.The (positive) association of lnTT and MVPA had a more intricate pattern: With Q1
of MVPA as the reference group, Q2 and Q3 had a significant association only in
Israelis, whereas Q4 had a significant association only in Palestinians. As
depicted in Tables
3 and 4
and Figure 4
(asterisk), the Palestinian Q2 had an anomaly with a B of
−0.11, the only stratum to have a negative association with lnTT. Interaction
was identified for Q2 (Pint = 0.015) and less so for Q3
(Pint = 0.154).The same models were generated for lnFT/LH (Tables 5 and 6), and ethnicity was significantly
associated with lnFT/LH, with B = −0.22 in Palestinians
compared with Israelis. Remarkably, none of the variables were associated with
lnFT/LH in Palestinians. In Israelis, both age and marital status were
associated with lnFT/LH (p = .007 for both). Religiosity,
education groups, smoking and alcohol consumption, and MVPA were not associated
with lnFT/LH.
Table 5.
FT/LH, Final Hierarchical Multivariable Linear Regression Model
(Sociodemographic and Lifestyle, PA and BMI), ln Transformed, in
Israelis and Palestinians.
Variable
Comparison
Israelis (n =
123)
Palestinians (n
= 160)
B
95% CI
p value
B
95% CI
p value
Age
per 1 year
−0.02
[−0.04, −0.01]
.007
−0.01
[−0.03, 0.00]
.187
Marital status
Cohabitation yes vs. no
0.29
[0.08, 0.50]
.007
0.17
[−0.12, 0.47]
.249
Religiosity
Observant and Orthodox
Reference category
Traditional
0.12
[−0.12, 0.35]
.323
−0.07
[−0.27, 0.14]
.513
Secular
0.02
[−0.20, 0.24]
.846
−0.10
[−0.45, 0.25]
.563
Highest education
Academic degree
Reference category
HS matriculation
0.25
[0.03, 0.46]
.024
−0.18
[−0.43, 0.08]
.179
HS
0.09
[−0.18, 0.35]
.519
−0.11
[−0.42, 0.20]
.482
Primary
0.02
[−0.28, 0.32]
.901
−0.12
[−0.37, 0.14]
.359
Smoking, cigarettes or hookah
Current smoker
Reference category
Former smoker
−0.01
[−0.24, 0.23]
.953
0.02
[−0.18, 0.22]
.850
Never smoker
−0.07
[−0.29, 0.16]
.560
0.20
[−0.01, 0.40]
.062
Alcohol use
None
Reference category
less than once a week
−0.05
[−0.34, 0.24]
.744
−0.08
[−0.41, 0.26]
.658
once a week or more
0.13
[−0.16, 0.43]
.373
−0.03
[−0.32, 0.27]
.840
BMI group
<25
Reference category
25–30
−0.26
[−0.45, −0.06]
.010
−0.06
[−0.25, 0.14]
.562
≥30
−0.28
[−0.53, −0.03]
.031
0.10
[−0.13, 0.33]
.412
MVPA EE
Q1 (lowest)
Reference category
Q2
0.12
[−0.09, 0.34]
.257
−0.12
[−0.38, 0.15]
.399
Q3
0.19
[−0.05, 0.42]
.121
−0.04
[−0.29, 0.21]
.751
Q4
0.08
[−0.29, 0.46]
.657
0.08
[−0.16, 0.32]
.506
R squared
.314
.101
Note. FT = free testosterone; LH = luteinizing
hormone; HS = high school; BMI = body mass index; PA = physical
activity; MVPA = moderate or vigorous physical activity; EE = energy
expenditure; MET = metabolic equivalent; P-int = p
value for interaction with ethnicity; Q = quartile.
In Israelis, BMI 25 to 30 and >30 groups had B = −0.26,
p = .01 and B = −0.28, p
= .031, respectively; this disparity with Palestinians resulted in a notable
interaction in both strata: similar pronounced B values in the
interaction models with significant interaction variables (Pint =
0.154 and 0.033).Several sensitivity analyses were then employed to validate findings. As FT and
BT are both considered to be physiologically available fractions, analyses were
repeated for BT, with no significant differences in associations. Alternative
grouping of strata for marital status and religiosity, and the use of BMI and PA
as scale variables, were also tested. The waist hip ratio (WHR), a common
measure of adiposity, was used as a substitute for BMI, broken into groups as
defined by the WHO. Final models revealed similar associations in all cases.
Discussion
In this study, we compared the associations that various sociodemographic and
lifestyle factors have with sex hormones between Palestinian and Israeli men in
Jerusalem. In the entire sample, as well as in Israelis and Palestinians, several
well-known associations of TT with age, marital status, and other sociodemographic
and lifestyle factors were seen. Differences in these associations between Israelis
and Palestinians were noted, with age, BMI, and PA having a stronger association in
Israelis, and marital status having a stronger association in Palestinians. The
FT/LH, which represents Leydig cell function, was identified to be associated with
age, marital status, and BMI, but only in Israelis, which also had a much higher
FT/LH ratio than Palestinians.
Sociodemographic Factors Associated With TT and Role of Ethnicity
Israelis had lower TT than Palestinians, with means lower but comparable to
American (Rohrmann et al.,
2007) and European (Halling et al., 2013) cohorts, all
within the range of 5.1 to 6.3 ng/ml (direct comparisons are not possible due to
methodological differences). No Middle Eastern regional data were available
other than a small Gazan sample (Yassin et al., 2017) that had a TT of
5.0 ± 2.2 ng/mL, similar to 5.1 ± 2.2 ng/mL in our Palestinian sample.Increasing age was associated with lower TT Israelis only, similar to previous
reports from Denmark and other Western countries (Andersson et al., 2007; McBride et al., 2016;
Muller et al.,
2003), with a decline of 2% reduction per year. Notably, despite very
similar age distributions, Palestinians had no association between age and TT
(based on lnTT analyses). An Interaction between age and ethnicity was revealed
for TT. While these differences could be related to many environmental or
genetic causes, it is possible that effects of aging are variable between
different ethnicities in regard to sex hormones.Differences in TT by marital status were noted for both Palestinians and Israelis
in line with studies among men from United States (Holmboe et al., 2017), Denmark (Maestripieri et al.,
2014), and China (Gray et al., 2006), with higher TT in
single men. Marital status was a stronger predictor of TT in Palestinian men and
the entire sample than in Israelis. Interaction proved significant, signaling
different effects in Israelis and Palestinians. A possible explanation could be
the different proportion of married men in the sample—90.7% in Palestinians and
74.2% in Israelis, allowing for more pronounced effects in Palestinians. This
finding could also stem from dissimilarities in reproductive effort (Gray et al., 2017)
that might be different in Israelis and Palestinians. Some cultural differences
in areas such as sexual behavior and promiscuity have been reported between
religions and ethnicities (Adamczyk & Hayes, 2012) and are known to affect male androgen
concentrations (Maestripieri et al., 2014). Associations of TT with religion and
education, much like in the literature, are unclear in our sample. These
associations are weak and insignificant.
Modifiable Lifestyle Factors
Smoking demonstrated a positive association with TT in both groups, with current
smokers having higher TT than former and never smokers, consistent with previous
literature (Muller et al.,
2003; Shiels et
al., 2009; Svartberg et al., 2003; Svartberg & Jorde, 2006). The
Israeli model demonstrated a milder, nonsignificant association. Possible
explanations of the elevated testosterone concentrations in smokers involve
aromatase inhibition (Shiels et al., 2009), reducing conversion of testosterone to
estradiol, and the shared breakdown pathway of nicotine, androgens, and their
metabolites through glucuronidation by the same enzymes (Zhao et al., 2016). Whereas Leydig
cell function alteration could also be a possible mechanism (Shiels et al., 2009;
Svartberg & Jorde,
2006), FT/LH was not associated at all with smoking.Alcohol use has been previously considered to have no or positive association
with TT (Muller et al.,
2003; Shiels et
al., 2009), but, surprisingly, a negative association was identified
in our Israeli sample for the two drinking groups over the no consumption group.
The no consumption group numbered only 14/124 of Israelis, possibly distorting
the association. The strong interaction between alcohol and ethnicity
(Pint < .01) could be attributed to the widely discordant
prevalence of alcohol use as 88.6% Israelis drank alcohol and 84.4% of
Palestinians did not.In both groups and in the entire sample, associations of TT with BMI (negative)
and PA (positive) were consistent with most of the literature (Allen et al., 2002;
Muller et al.,
2003; Shiels et
al., 2009; despite limited contradicting evidence; Svartberg et al.,
2003). Both BMI and PA associations were more pronounced in Israelis.Based on B values, Israelis had stronger associations with BMI. Ethnicity was
revealed to interact with these associations. Different patterns of obesity in
ethnic groups were described by Lopez et al. (2013), attributed in
part to differences in visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (Carroll et al., 2008).
Hill et al.
(1999) reported ethnic (White and Black men) differences in
tomographic imaging of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue, despite
adjusting for obesity metrics. Similar analyses have not been done between
Israelis and Palestinians. Such differences could explain the interaction in our
study as visceral adipose tissue has higher metabolism of androgens than
subcutaneous adipose tissue.Both Israelis and Palestinians demonstrated a known, positive association between
PA and TT. The PA quartiles in both groups had different associations: the
second and third quartiles were associated with PA in Israelis only (and had
corresponding Pint), and the fourth quartile was associated in
Palestinians only. Of note, baseline distributions were quite different between
the groups—Israelis comprised only 10/71 of men in the fourth quartile of PA. A
possible explanation might be a different distribution of types of PA between
the groups. The MESA questionnaire used in our sample inquired mainly about
aerobic activities. For example, it is known (Eliakim & Nemet, 2006) that
anaerobic PA elevates testosterone levels more than aerobic activity.In addition, as previously published (Merom et al., 2012), activities that
constitute PA are different between the ethnic groups: Palestinians had their PA
derived primarily from their work (39% vs. 22% in Israelis) rather than leisure.
This was demonstrated to be true in sensitivity analyses carried out in our
sample as well: ethnic differences in leisure time PA were less pronounced than
total MVPA.
Leydig Cell Function and Ethnicity
The FT/LH ratio is a seldom used measure of the HPG axis and Leydig cell
function. Its associations with PA were previously described (Priskorn et al.,
2016). To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate FT/LH ratio
in this manner for other factors. Primary differences in sex hormones between
Israelis and Palestinians were noted in FT/LH (31.2 ng/IU vs. 25.8 ng/IU) and
could be secondary to LH differences (3.90 IU/L vs. 4.96 IU/L). The paucity of
Middle Eastern andrological literature allows for limited interpretation of this
finding; as noted, the FT/LH ratios are not readily available for comparison in
the literature.The FT/LH ratio was not correlated with any variables in the Palestinian group,
which could mean that it is not a suitable metric for some populations. The
FT/LH had an association with age in Israelis only, consistent with current
literature indicating a reduced Leydig cell function with age. The FT/LH also
had an association with marital status (B = 0.29 for married
men over single men) in Israelis only. This increase is not evident in
Palestinians in Table
5, with FT/LH ratios similar between marital status groups but was
significant in the adjusted models (Table 6). This finding also
contradicts some of the findings of Holmboe et al. (2017). In their study,
TT/LH was used to reflect Leydig cell function, and was not reported to be
correlated with marital status. No associations of religiosity, education,
alcohol, or smoking with FT/LH were reported. The FT/LH ratios were not
associated with PA, corroborating a very similar analysis (Priskorn et al., 2016) of association
of PA quartiles with FT/LH.Different physiological and disease processes are extensively documented between
Israelis and Palestinians (Kark et al., 2006; Mahamid et al., 2019; Merom et al., 2012;
Weiss et al.,
2015). TT proved similar in the two groups. These similarities in
hormone concentrations were also described in the NHANES III cohort (Rohrmann et al., 2007)
in which TT levels were reported to be similar between non-Hispanic Black,
non-Hispanic White, and Mexican Americans, and virtually identical to our Middle
Eastern sample. In addition, a variety of ethnic differences in relationships
and gender roles between Israelis and Palestinians can also play a part.
Cultural differences in sexual behavior and reproductive effort, as discussed
above, are prime examples.Our study has several weaknesses, such as the cross-sectional design, precluding
us from inferring casual relationships. It also might have had some recall bias
of self-reported behaviors that lead to misclassifications and may weaken
associations. Our assessment of hormone measurements and Leydig cell function
was based on immunological tests rather than more precise methods. In addition,
the possibility of selection bias exists, as the response rate was low, more so
among Israelis compared with Palestinians.In conclusion, similar to previous reports, various factors were identified to be
positively associated with TT—young age, being single, lower BMI, and higher PA.
Importantly, associations reported in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere
were corroborated in our Middle Eastern sample. This was more pronounced in
Israelis, with Palestinians having weaker associations. Moreover, FT/LH was a
relevant measure of Leydig cell function in Israeli men only. Differences
between Israelis and Palestinians are partially explained by the discussed
social and behavioral differences. Variant demographics and genetics also play a
role. These ethnic differences are to be elucidated in further research.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-1-jmh-10.1177_15579883221106060 for Different
Factors Are Associated With Sex Hormones and Leydig Cell Function in Israelis
and Palestinians in Jerusalem by Guy Vishnevsky, Ronit Sinnreich, Hisham Nassar,
Dafna Merom, Maya Ish-Shalom, Jeremy D. Kark and Hagai Levine in American
Journal of Men’s HealthClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-2-jmh-10.1177_15579883221106060 for Different
Factors Are Associated With Sex Hormones and Leydig Cell Function in Israelis
and Palestinians in Jerusalem by Guy Vishnevsky, Ronit Sinnreich, Hisham Nassar,
Dafna Merom, Maya Ish-Shalom, Jeremy D. Kark and Hagai Levine in American
Journal of Men’s HealthClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-3-jmh-10.1177_15579883221106060 for Different
Factors Are Associated With Sex Hormones and Leydig Cell Function in Israelis
and Palestinians in Jerusalem by Guy Vishnevsky, Ronit Sinnreich, Hisham Nassar,
Dafna Merom, Maya Ish-Shalom, Jeremy D. Kark and Hagai Levine in American
Journal of Men’s Health
Authors: Majon Muller; Isolde den Tonkelaar; Jos H H Thijssen; Diederick E Grobbee; Yvonne T van der Schouw Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: Mark G Thomas; Michael E Weale; Abigail L Jones; Martin Richards; Alice Smith; Nicola Redhead; Antonio Torroni; Rosaria Scozzari; Fiona Gratrix; Ayele Tarekegn; James F Wilson; Cristian Capelli; Neil Bradman; David B Goldstein Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2002-04-30 Impact factor: 11.025