| Literature DB >> 35815249 |
Abstract
College sports serving national fitness are a complex system. College sports are an important part of national fitness. Basketball curriculum, as a subsystem of college sports, has always been loved by college students. The reform of college basketball curriculum mode is an important way to explore the coordinated evolution of college sports subsystem. Through the methods of questionnaire, interview, and mathematical statistics, aiming at the problems existing in the planning and design of basketball curriculum objectives and contents in colleges and universities, this study puts forward that it is necessary to establish a scientific and reasonable basketball special curriculum objective system and then combine the basketball curriculum teaching theory with the basketball training teaching mode, to cultivate students' practical application ability, and adopt a variety of teaching methods to cultivate students' practical ability. Finally, the teaching mode of basketball is improved. Through an example, the application effect of the basketball curriculum model under the background of national fitness proposed in this study is tested. The results show that the basketball curriculum teaching model proposed in this study has certain feasibility and effectiveness.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35815249 PMCID: PMC9270120 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2869323
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1Relationship between physical education curriculum and national fitness system in colleges and universities.
Comparison of basketball teaching content between colleges and middle schools.
| Content school | Middle school basketball syllabus | College basketball syllabus |
|---|---|---|
| Dribble | (1) Straight and curve dribbling | (1) Straight and curve dribbling |
| (2) In situ cross-step breakthrough | (2) High and low dribbling | |
| (3) In situ ipsilateral breakthrough | (3) Swerving dribble | |
| Passing and catching | (1) Two-handed chest passing | (1) Two-handed chest passing |
| (2) Two-handed overhead passing | (2) Two-handed overhead passing and catching | |
| (3) One-handed shoulder passing | (3) One-handed shoulder passing | |
| (4) One-handed rebound passing | (4) One- and two-handed rebound passing and catching | |
| Footwork | (1) Turn: front turn, back turn | (1) Running: varied direction running, sideways running, backward running, varied pace running |
| (2) Emergency stop: jump emergency stop, step emergency stop | (2) Jump: jump on both feet or on one foot | |
| (3) Slide step: side slide step, back and forth slide | (3) Emergency stop: step, jump stop | |
| (4) Turn: front turn, back turn | ||
| (5) Slide step: side slide step | ||
| Shooting | (1) One-handed shoulder shot | (1) One-handed shoulder shot in situ |
| (2) Layups on the move | (2) Two-handed chest shot in situ | |
| (3) Jump shot | (3) One-handed running underhand shot | |
| Tactics | (1) Defensive tactics: man-to-man defense | (1) Introduction to fast break (attack and defense): two on one, three on two |
| (2) Introduction to joint defense (attack and defense): two-on-two formation | ||
| (3) Introduction to tactics: man to man in half-court | ||
| Special physical quality | No | (1) Speed: 30–50 m acceleration |
| (2) Strength: sit-ups, push-ups, supine leg lifts, etc. | ||
| (3) Endurance: middle-distance race of various distances | ||
| (4) Flexibility and coordination exercises | ||
| Examine | (1) Minute jump shot | (1) A straight and curve dribbling followed by a three-step layup |
| (2) Three-step layup | (2) Shot | |
| (3) Two-handed chest passing | ||
| Credit hour | 30 | 34 |
Figure 2Statistics of students' contact time with basketball.
Figure 3Self-assessment of basic basketball level.
Figure 4Statistics of times students participate in basketball every week.
Figure 5Statistical results of course selection motivation.
Figure 6Statistics of expectations for participating in basketball through learning basketball lessons.
Figure 7Schematic diagram of teaching goal design system of basketball course.
Figure 8Schematic diagram of key points of basketball practical teaching.
Figure 9Decomposition diagram of basketball practice teaching method.
Figure 10Decomposition diagram of hierarchical teaching evaluation system.
Comparison results of teaching implementation effects between the two groups.
| Item | Teaching theory test | Physical fitness test | Practical skill test | Application ability test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 82.4 | 84.8 | 86.3 | 83.6 |
| Experimental group | 85.7 | 86.2 | 93.5 | 89.4 |
|
| >0.05 | >0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
Comparison of students' psychological evaluation results after practical teaching.
| Item | Emotional change | Sports motivation | Collective self-esteem |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 18.35 ± 2.56 | 37.58 ± 4.27 | 83.52 ± 8.16 |
| Experimental group | 22.27 ± 2.83 | 41.35 ± 4.63 | 89.26 ± 8.47 |
|
| 2.164 | 2.263 | 3.472 |
|
| <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
Figure 11Comparison of the proportion of students in the two groups with good teaching evaluation.